User talk:Edunk5

Welcome!

Hello, Edunk5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 07:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edunk5, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! Edunk5, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Onorem (talk) 11:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scissor Sisters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Patrick Monahan, you may be blocked from editing. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Train (band). --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 in Australian television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thunderstone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Nostalgia Critic episodes (2015), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teenie Hodges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Germantown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Another Gay Movie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Justice Crew, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Lightsout (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2014. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 10:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPCAT

Read WP:BLPCAT; it's why I reverted you. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Vic Mignogna. Especially concerning his birthdate. See WP:BLPPRIVACY AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How about you find a source for it yourself.

WP:BURDEN.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to add unsourced personal information or unsupported ethnic and descent categories to biography articles, you will be blocked from editing. Many editors have left you messages explaining why your edits are contrary to policy and have been reverted, yet you have completely disregarded their messages. You need to include reliable sources when adding such material.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:20, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2014, you may be blocked from editing. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 09:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning' the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rory Cochrane. You have received multiple prior warnings for edits to biographical articles, yet here you added a category to an article that clearly is unsupported by the text at this time. This is a violation of WP:BLPCAT, which you were linked to earlier. Please stop adding unsourced or unsupported information immediately. DonIago (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I already gave you a final warning in December, which you have chosen to ignore, therefore you have been blocked for 1 week.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Christopher Poole page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Continued poor sourcing

I've reverted your edits at Christopher Poole as you added a birth date without including a reliable source. If you don't understand what a reliable source is, please don't continue to edit BLP articles. You have a history of BLP violations and may be subject to additional sanctions if the issues continue.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Alex Hirsch, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 22:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of best-selling music artists, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You just posted to my talk page apologizing for adding unsourced personal info to articles, yet you're still doing it. This is absolutely your last warning; if it continues you will be blocked.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:38, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Edunk5. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Honorific nicknames in popular music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derrick May (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Edunk5. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Michael Jordan, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:SEAOFBLUE, please dont break up [[<city>, <state>]] to link to the city and state separately. —Bagumba (talk) 00:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Stop with the unsourced category additions! Rob van vee 10:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Please stop with the unsourced cats. At this rate you can expect to blocked again for your disruptive editing. Rob van vee 10:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1987, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Elizium23 (talk) 00:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 07:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've gone back to highly eccentric and disruptive category additions, despite many warnings over many years, so you have been blocked. You are not welcome here. Graham87 07:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've also blocked your IP range, 2001:8003:ED1B:4600::/64. Graham87 08:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Edunk5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I pesonally feel that I've been wrongfully blocked because I believe I was just being helpful. What I did wasn't vandalism or disruptive editing on my part as I just like to add people, places or anything having to do with the culture and heritage of a particular place to help enrich the culture and prevent erasure especially with regards to African-American culture and history such as Fletcher Street Urban Riding Club and Bessie Stringfield. I also did this to highlight where their roots lie especially national icons because they may be national icons but they have nuances regarding the environment they were raised in so it's justified. Users have included culture related pages without consequence such as Prince for Culture of Minneapolis, Whitney Houston for Culture of Newark, New Jersey, Aziz Ansari for Tamil-American culture, South Park for Colorado culture and Gravity Falls for Oregon culture. Some users have accepted my edits such as that of Bill Murray and Dan Savage. Even edits to pages where I didn't add a culture or history related category have been reverted such as the Kiwiana page where I added Kozmik to the fashion section. I feel like I've became gaslighted and that it skewed my view on right and wrong. I thought I was doing the right thing yet some fellow Wikipedia users just love to complicate things. I've became quite bitter ever since. I'm sure some Wikipedia users as well as people from the areas where I added culture or history related categories will oppose my block.Edunk5 (talk) 23:44, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A mess made out of a desire to be helpful is still a mess. Adding categories must be supported, and if controversial, a consensus obtained first before you begin adding them to dozens of articles. If an artist has a "nuance regarding the environment they were raised in" you need a reliable source to support that claim. As this request seems to be attempting to justify your edits, and not explain how they were disruptive, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 06:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.