This is an archive of past discussions about User:Editor510. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hmmm, well we should WP:AGF but I fear his time as an editor will be short, based on his other contribs. Well done for warning him. Watch his contribs, probably he won't edit much more but if he impersonates someone again, tell a friendly admin. StickyParkin09:29, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
I see a great future ahead of you on WP- it will be similar to mine.:) And with the social elements of User:Dfrg.msc. But there are a lot of boring policies etc for you to memorize the details of first. Try and take a look at the articles at WP:AfD and see people's arguments and perhaps contribute after a while of watching. Some of your edits about songs etc, tend to verge on WP:OR- for most of your interpretations of songs that you add, I'd like to see a source. So you might like to see how the sources explain songs. You can do this be typing the name of the song, enclosed in quotes ", into google news [2] (click on 'search archive, to the left too) or google books.[3]. A person can't be an adopter as far as I know until you've graduated from the adoption program if you're wanting to be in and stay in it. In order to graduate from the program I'd like to see you getting in a habit of adding sources to articles, or when you add a statement adding statements which are sourced in WP:RS as I described the method of finding them above (not just 'normal' google which is full of forums etc) although you can make other non-controversial edits of course. Contribute with less WP:NOT/myspace etc. and there are no other major problems with your edits- you don't swear etc, though you could grovel a bit more to admins when in trouble. Hope this helps and is not too depressing.:) StickyParkin21:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Not for us it isn't lol:) Vous parlez francais? Je suis dans le wikipedia francais aussi! They're more polite there- even the vandals.:) StickyParkin22:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
refs
I'm glad to see you trying to put refs for your edits. But instead of your perception of what's happening in a program etc, like this [6] , which is called WP:OR, and using that as a reference, you need to find instances in WP:RS, such as to use an invented example, "Fred Bloggs, television journalist, says the Nerd has a shocked expression," then ideally link to where Fred says that. If not, stick to very simple edits, perhaps like this one, which no-one will question, where you don't need to add a reference. Otherwise perhaps WP:ANAL editors are going to revert you.:( StickyParkin17:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
I thought it might make you feel better about yourself that even though you don't feel confident doing references yet, you are a good faith contributor. 903 was okay at references but has been blocked as a sock of this person [7]StickyParkin23:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
No you didn't freak me out at all- you didn't do anything to freak me out. Try not to be disillusioned. It was my other adoptee who freaked me out if anything, being one of dozens of sock puppets of a banned user lol.:) What are you writing about? I'm writing a little pamphlet about a type of reiki, to be published by lulu.com, but mainly in a tongue in cheek fashion.:) StickyParkin20:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Reverting vandals is pleasurable.:) If you print a book on lulu and manage to sell a fair few copies, it's easier for you to persuade a publisher to publish your book, as you can prove to them that people want to buy what you write. Not that I care lol, I'm just doing it for fun.:) StickyParkin21:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes- a confirmed repeat offender [8] Don't worry, unless you misbehave, you won't have to go to wikiprison lol:) (oh and it wasn't me that got her blocked or even knew about it until the end; some people who knew her under her old IDs spotted her.) StickyParkin21:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
AtheWeatherman (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Oooooh, sound:) The forum on a wetpaint wiki is fun if you want to set one up, although it's hard to attract users perhaps. If you mention it, mention it (not to people you don't know well) via email so you don't get accused of spamming WP. I'm on a wetpaint forum [9] excuse the subject matter lol :) The owner is called vegan4satan. I think she uses the wiki part mainly for her own writings/info she wants to add, but her forum is quite fun. StickyParkin12:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
barnie/userpage
OOoooh, I love that one, thank you:) There's something wrong with my userpage code, and the barnstars, which should be in the 'wikipersonality' section of the collapsible box, aren't showing up. You're better at these things than me- could you possibly fnd out what's wrong with the code and sort it out? StickyParkin17:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
The collapsible boxes are a bit down the page and called 'about me etc'. Then the barnstars are in the section called 'wikipersonality and articles created' or something, there's quite a lot there so you have to scroll through it. In the edit window it's after the list of articles created. All the code for thhe barnstars appears there but they aren't showing up, so there must be a bracket or something missing :( StickyParkin17:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
You think that's the end? WikiNation is returning. You are the last to know about it. Anyway oh mighty king, I cannot call you that anymore. I now have to call you oh holy,mighty, great, honorable and rightous WIKIGOD!.
WikiNation is coming. 25/11/08 or another date.Darkside2000 (talk) 13:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
P.s forgot to add, what should your Honorable page look like? And which Planet shout you rule or universe? (state the name because you are making that up) This is one Nation that will never die! You will rule forever!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and so on. P.s The delay was the planning stage, soory for not saying earlier.Darkside2000 (talk) 13:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Wishing Editor510 and your kin the very best of the holiday season. Just teasing with this card lol, may the coming year bring you liberty, joy, health and happiness. May He bless us, every one!
The film adaption section has abysmal continuity! It suddenly says "...finds out that Jack is Eric..." It doesn't say anywhere about a name change! Please keep a closer watch, and I am being as WP:CIVIL as I can.--Editor510drop us a line, mate22:07, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Maybe you're being civil, but you're not being very attentive or accurate. Here is a direct quote from the section in question: "Eric, shy and eager to be good again, builds up a new life under the name Jack Burridge". So, to use your words, please keep a closer look. Ward3001 (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Please don't do that
I've removed your comment from Talk:Miley Cyrus. Please don't put it back. First, the talk pages are not a forum for discussing the topic, they are only for discussing improvements to the article. Second, there's no reason to give the idiots that make these hoaxes any more attention.—Kww(talk) 20:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Eddie hun
User:Editor510/godrubbish- this could be considered as unpleasant towards other's religions, in breach of User_boxes#Content_restrictions. In userboxes, it's better to express what you like, rather than what you don't like. In userspace, the rules are more free and less rigid, but I still suggest you reword it a bit. How about "Is a sceptic, and rubbishes some establishment beliefs' or something like that? StickyParkin00:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
What is offensive is a subjective judgment of course, but such userboxes are generally not advised. I don't think the other ones are quite the same, but that's my opinion of course. Just because jokey ones insulting Islam and so on exist, doesn't mean other similar userboxes should be created. StickyParkin17:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for editing my userpage. I thought I had my there's down! I seriously always pat myself on the back for my usage of their, there, and they're. When I saw your edit I was truly peed, but I must thank you for your correction. How did you happen to stumble by my page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Backvoods (talk • contribs) 01:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
It was an IP, not him, who originally made that edit [10] Please don't make comments that could look (rightly or wrongly) like personal attacks in edit summaries. Also, Um has been here less than three weeks. Be excellent unto him.:) StickyParkin19:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Ed, Edd n Eddy
Please refrain from adding unsourced information to Wikipedia. Your edit smells like vandalism. Level 3 warning. -- Elaichtalk08:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I now award you the compensatory barnstar, a barnstar obscuring numerous warning icons. This is intended to be given on Wikipedia in compensation for unjustified "warning templates" for positive, good faith editing. StickyParkin20:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
You mentioned this on the admin's noticeboard the other week, I think. Have you had any problems with him from a slightly different IP, only I don't think he's made any edits from that IP in the last few weeks. Hence he won't be blocked for it. But if you have any further probs ask an admin to block him, he's already been blocked several times. [11]StickyParkin14:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey Ed hun, no-one's saying you don't have a right to be an atheist [12]. It's just a matter of what is the right way to express it on the wiki. I myself am a Satanist. StickyParkin 00:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Who would have guessed?Darkside2000 (talk) 15:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
They're wrong. You're right. No matter what actually happens. End of story.
With regards to God, that's just a matter of belief and faith and opinion and all that boring stuff. No juicy argument there. But as for you using your userpage area to create userboxes like the one saying "This user thinks that God is similar to a load of rubbish," you are expressing a strongly worded personal opinion on the wiki in an appropriate manner, and they are wrong to seek its deletion. I don't think this is a dispute between atheists and Christians. I think it is a dispute between the rational and irrational. Rational people recognize that there is nothing inflammatory or divisive about a strongly worded opinion. Irrational busybodies live in a fantasy land where they imagine they are protecting some non-existent group of offended people by neutering the blunt and powerful language of others. Flying Jazz (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to hear you've departed permanently. Must have. The Christians will never allow you the right to disbelieve in their particular god. A lot of them don't even allow that right to other Christians... Incidentally, have you noticed that most of the ones that attack homosexuality (because it's supposed to be condemned in the Old Testament) eat pork sausages, bacon and pork chops? Peridon (talk) 01:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Favour
Hi Eddie, please could you do me a favour and extend a hand/welcome to User:LifeStroke420? S/he s is a new addition to our family, who we are inviting in because she has been having a few probs. on wiki. Perhaps you could drop her a note with some politically correct/tactful encouragement. i.e. not of the zomg, aren't admins evil? variety :) I know I can trust you to show your natural enthusiasm (appropriately.) :) StickyParkin23:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Im extending the article on the game Commander In Chief. I'm also doing a Wikiheroes dof project. It is to be styled as an rpg as users create their own hero and edit their actions and story. If it's deleted it will be on the Wikitopia wikia. Thanks for the reply mate!!!Darkside2000 (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Forget it I just bought it and realiesd my computer can't handle it when i opened it. Since its pc I can't return it!! GAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Darkside2000 (talk) 08:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Flavoured userboxes
I just wanted to say that your flavoured userboxes are awesome. You deserve a cookie.
You know that story anybody can edit?Could I get permission to do something simalar?Drop me a line by my talk page, ASAP, okay?
--JazzieIce! (talk) 01:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
I've been bored for a looooonnnnnngggggg time so I am now starting a new page. WikiNation was alive since Jan but I closed it due to inactivity. If you still want to be the king I can still reopen the website anew with a request. Nothing really has happened.Bye!!Darkside2000 (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
User pages notification
I've noticed you have a lot of user pages which may not comply with Wikipedia's user page guidelines, please tag ones you no longer require with {{db-user}} which asks admins to delete it for you.
First of all I have to say goodbye to you. We will miss you terribly here.
I am really bored. Anyway your position is always there if you wnat it back since I am the Wikigod guy. WikiNation still lives. If you ever want to go back to the good old days when we kept editing the WikiNation page before it got deleted then leave me a note. Any pages you made and were deleted will be kept when you remake them. Yes, I am applying for a WikiNation Wikia. I did that last time and the application was successful! Of course no-one added to it much. I deleted it a few months after. Anyway Farewell. And if I don't see you again, goodafternoon, goodevening and goodnight. From Darkside2000 (talk) 09:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your thoughtful contribution to this page, I have however removed the warning you placed at the top of this page per WP:NODISCLAIMERS. Disclaimers are not permitted in articles themselves as all are covered by disclaimers linked at the bottom of every article, in particular in this case WP:RISK. Camaron · Christopher ·talk20:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
The passage you removed is actually a fairly well-known anecdote (though of course it should ideally be referenced). AnonMoos (talk) 18:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
"Asimov received frequent criticism about his books that they never included aliens or sex, so Asimov included in this book aliens, sex, and alien sex."
Hi Eddie, sorry I missed your message for so long. I don't really edit anymore. IMHO you just need to reference more stuff rather than doing anything that is construed by other editors as WP:OR. Survive for 3 months without any editor accusing you with any possible validity of WP:OR and you can consider yourself passed. At that point you can message me for some 'yay I've passed' bling to put on your userpage, and I'll answer sooner or later lol. Who'dve thought you would outlast me lol. I got sick o
f the behaviour of some other editors and how if they were in a position of power on wiki they could get away with anything. StickyParkin11:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Whether you can get a corrupt or otherwise dodgy admin dealt with depends how many cronies they have, plus they tend to get a slap on the wrist, rather than a block which some of them deserve. Of course you'll pass sooner or later, you're not thick lol, quite the opposite.:) StickyParkin18:59, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
We've got a verifiability policy which means that our articles need to be verifiable. Furthermore the BLP says we take this especially seriously in the case of living people. In a recent edit [13] you added the following text to Teller (entertainer):
In an appearance on The One Show, Teller cupped a hand over his mouth, and threw his voice into the audience so that he could reply to a question by Penn Jillette ('I sure do, Penn!'){{fact}}
I'm wondering if any of us are actually editing on Wikipedia anymore? I've not logged in for at least a year now and I'm wondering if you are still editing BTW My DOF pagesare still here, I haven't updated them in AGES!.Darkside2000 (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Things have changed since then, I've been looking back at what I've created edited over my time here at Wikipedia. A lot of it makes me cringe, some I would even consider being a Dethroning Moment of Suck (See what I did there) If I ever return to Wikipedia fully as a proper, more sensible and serious editor, I'll have to clean a few things up first. I was suprised that my DOF page was still there.Before I go, I must say that I want to read or at least watch Neon Genesis Evangelion, I love Yu Gi Oh Abridged (even though I don't play childrens card games) and am also a huge fan of the TV show Arrested Development.I also bought Saints Row the Third a few days ago. It was Amazing and I didn't expect it to be as good. Darkside2000 (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
I think that if I'm going become a serious editor, I'll have to first cleanup my whole talk page, clearing it(unless you want me to keep some of it then which I will). Then I'd have to remove what I typed on my main page because some of that is, quite frankly, humiliating. Darkside2000 (talk) 22:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Anyway, the blackout is going to happen, good thing I eat carrots then. Darkside2000 (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar
To the greatest friend I ever had on Wikipedia. A few years late but who cares.
Good grief, it's been a year already?
As I can see you're still around. I just wish Wikipedia had a PM System...
At least TV Tropes is more addictive.
I don't know who long it's been since we did the WikiNation thing, probably 4-5 years...
Well it's nice to talk to you anyway at least.
Darkside2000 (talk) 17:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Exactly. The DOF is still there, they ask for more money while that is just being forgotten about.
If it was a little better it could be justified now but not at the moment. There are better sites for craziness than Wikipedia.Darkside2000 (talk) 15:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Since you are still here, editing away, I might as well start too, although I'm nowhere near as addicted to wikipedia as I once was. I just still stick on the net, looking up random garbage though.I really ought to stop that. The good news is GTA V is out soon. I'll be getting that and trying to avoid the spoilers until then Darkside2000 (talk) 11:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I'd do that too. I think we should stick to the one page if we are going to talk, as it'll be a bit awkward talking between our two pages. I still wish Wikipedia had a PM system Darkside2000 (talk) 14:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olbas Oil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Well back again, still around. The DOF and my What the Wikipedian Saw page is still alive somehow. Can't believe how long it's been now, last message I think I sent you here was 2 years ago. Amazing how time flies. Wish wikipedia had a better chat function rather than me having to do all this. Unless they do and I don't know about it. Darkside2000 (talk) 22:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm looking through my old posts, I can't tell you how much cringing I am experiencing right now. Giant Facepalm stuff. Darkside2000 (talk) 22:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay, I made an account and didn't log in again lol, will try to do something with it this time. Of course I remember you and I like to look in on what you're upto:) When you're in your 30s, 7 years pass really quite quickly! Are you at uni now? (congratulations!) How're you getting on there, settling in ok? xx SatansFeminist (talk) 00:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Editor510. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Editor510. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi Eddie! (Tis StickyParkin again). Sorry to be sporadic and mainly just pop on occasionally to see how you're doing. Wiki lost it's charm for me once a couple of my other fave editors left. So- how's everything going? Are you still at Uni? What's your five year plan? :) SatansFeminist (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wide-leg jeans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hi Eddie, sorry for the delay. We will soon keep in touch on something I/we actually use. :) My FB is more interesting than my twitter but will msg you on there with it.
So glad you've got so far with uni despite your health! Well done! Have you published your novel? I do recommend it if only on Lulu. What sort of thing is it? I published something once, and hope to have something else finished soon.
I completely understand as I've had bipolar occassionally for many years, and have recently diagnosed with ADHD (I recommend getting tested as the meds really help-worth you trying!) and probably ASD. I'm 41! No-one really knew I had these conditions until I saw a private consultant, because I don't fit the profile- am fairly outgoing though I often go wrong socially lol, and did ok academically because I tried hard on and off. :) But it was far harder and took me longer than the average person, because the ADHD meant I had difficulties with motivation and also dealing with stress, and also poor self esteem etc. I'm saying all this because an assessment might help you- you never know!
Yes I often wonder recently what it would've been like to be diagnosed with some of these things at 10 rather than 41 :) There was very little awareness of these conditions in the 80s :) I think nowadays if I was that age I might be diagnosed with ASD, as teachers etc are more aware now. I still wouldn't be diagnosed with ADHD as I did ok academically. They need to be more aware that that can happen- people can do fairly well, but not as well as they would without the condition.
Hello, Editor510. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
It's 2020, checked to see if my page at the department of fun was alive. It is. What the wikipedian saw has been going for 12 years. I can't believe it. Darkside2000 (talk) 09:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SLAPP Suits, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black lung. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLIT (short story) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I wish Wikipedia had a pm feature, doing alright here but its been 15 years since we made wikination and stuff. Help. I feel old Darkside2000 (talk) 17:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Max Headroom broadcast signal intrusion incident. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Sticky Parkin 19:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
d#c-Thedarxide-2009-02-15T08:43:00.000Z-File:Do-us-a-flavour.JPG){kind=link}
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Empty Cans, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Empty Cans" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
