User talk:Dronebogus/draft4

Creepy

What are your reasons for keeping this creepy, SS-style list, Dronebogus? Seeing as I feature, I think I have a right to know. Many thanks. Cassianto^Talk 17:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to SandyGeorgia, this is about editors' "apparent stance on infoboxes". That's not at all "creepy". -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've started this on this editor's main talk page, so it is seen by a wider readership (if there is one). Cassianto^Talk 19:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't choose the word "creepy", but a) would like to understand the purpose of the list, and b) wonder if no one will ever question the extent to which Dronebogus's focus on infoboxes goes, and c) whether that focus has produced healthy interaction and has been conducive to developing articles. The page appears to track the stance of Gilbert & Sullivan members on infoboxes, and I can't come up with any reason for doing that that doesn't invoke battleground territory. But perhaps Dronebogus will explain ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the editor interaction profile of the first 20. ——Serial 19:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]