User talk:Drdaviss

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Drdaviss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maryland Psychiatric Society (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maryland Psychiatric Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Drdaviss, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maryland Psychiatric Society (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs better sources. We cannot use the organization's web page as a source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maryland Psychiatric Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 18:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 31 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the American Psychiatric Association page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notes

Would you please take care to make more accurate edit notes? "improve categories" is not what you did here. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 00:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maryland Psychiatric Society

Hello, Drdaviss. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Maryland Psychiatric Society".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 22:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article on "morbid gain"

Hello!

I have found your profile on the Wikipedia Project on Medicine, looking for an expert in psychiatry. I believe the article on "primary and secondary morbid gain" ( http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Primary_and_secondary_gain ) is not of medium, let alone low relevance, but of high relevance, in psychiatry, medicine in general, and also economically and from a social/societal/and family perspective.

The article has very substantial quality issues, being blatantly wrong oftentimes. I would like to ask you to put a strong reader warning to the top of that article until it is fixed, and if possible temporary point readers to the German article which is well-written (i.e., mention that they should check that one out).

The issues have already been noted on the discussion page by other users, but nobody seems to care.

I have translated the German article in part (I am a German native speaker, but not an English native speaker (obviously)). However I can guarantee that the translation is 100% correct -- just not in good style always:

http://de.wiki.x.io/wiki/Krankheitsgewinn

Morbid gain (German: Krankheitsgewinn) is a general term for the objective and/or subjective advantages that a (actually or supposedly) ill person derives from his illness or that a patient derives from his diagnosis.

Table of Contents

   1 General
   2 Primary and secondary morbid gain
   3 Tertiary and quaternary morbid gain
   4 References

General

In European culture, as soon as a person assumes the role of a sick person, he or she can generally expect ...

   to be relieved of everyday duties,
   to experience sympathy / pity / compassion and/or
   to be treated gently by his environment.

The sick person can also count on economic support from social insurance agencies; he is thus partially or completely relieved of having to work for a living.[1]

This attitude is generally considered socially desirable and needs to be distinguished from aggravation and simulation:

   Simulation is a deliberate and conscious pretense and imitation of symptoms of disease without pathological significance.
   In aggravation, actual symptoms of disease are present; these are then intentionally overemphasized.[2]

The classification of primary and secondary morbid gain goes back to Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis.

Primary and secondary morbid gain

Primary morbid gain consists of inner or direct advantages that the sick person derives from his symptoms: e.g., it allows him to avoid situations or conflicts that he perceives as unpleasant. The symptom is then experienced as unpleasant, but it allows the sick person not to have to make an immediate decision that could lead out of the conflict; often he does not even recognize that he is facing a conflict. He only feels in an unpleasant situation that at that moment seems hopeless to him and that makes him weak. The connection between this conflict and symptoms of illness is not considered possible and remains unconscious. Also, the symptom may unconsciously serve to avoid more unpleasant conflicts (e.g., suddenly falling ill before a difficult exam).

Secondary morbid gain (external morbid gain[3]) refers to the external benefits that the ill person can derive from existing symptoms, such as receiving attention and consideration from those around them and/or, for example, being able to stay in bed and be served food there.[5]

Tertiary and quaternary morbid gain

Tertiary morbid gain refers to benefits for the patient's environment. For example, for relatives, the care they are providing can be perceived as enrichment, since the caregiver is elevated to a position of competence and feels that he or she is needed, and can thus view himself or herself as a savior. In the broadest sense, all health care professions profit from tertiary morbid gain; see also helper syndrome.

Quaternary morbid gain refers to the ideological reevaluation and upvaluation of suffering or illness.[7] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.189.110.31 (talk) 14:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]