User talk:Dr Fil

Welcome

Hi and welcome to wikipedia. I noticed you had a blank talk page, so I decided to welcome you. I hope you like it and decide to stay. Here are some handy links for newcomers.

Also you can sign your name on talk pages and vote pages with three tildes like this ~~~, and your name with a time stamp with four like this ~~~~. Howabout1 15:01, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Little green men

Thank you for your (considerable) additions to Little green men – very interesting. --Bruce1ee 09:26, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Ruppelt Ramey Sanford 1952-07-29.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ruppelt Ramey Sanford 1952-07-29.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --SCEhard T 23:57, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal pending at 9/11 conspiracy theories

I have officially proposed to split the 9/11 conspiracy theories article, with the two most in depth areas being moved to separate articles at Allegations of Jewish or Israeli complicity in 9/11 and Allegations of U.S. government complicity in 9/11. I feel this will help alleviate the problem of the main article being too large and allow these two distinct concepts to be discussed in depth separately. Further division may be in order in the future, but I feel this is an important first step. Please check out the discussion at Talk:9/11_conspiracy_theories#Proposal_to_split_this_article. Thank you. Blackcats 04:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on ?! Answer in 6 words

See Robertson Panel and Brookings Report. Martial Law 00:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

The former protocol uses psychiatrists in it, so that all who see UFOs and/or aliens will be declared mentally unfit, i.e. crazy, nuts, etc. Martial Law 00:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Robertson Panel protocol was initiated by the CIA to "reduce", if not eliminate interest in UFOs, aliens, that sort of thing in 1953. This is intended to ridicule any and all who see these things, are interested in these matters. I've been all over the US and its the same all over the place. People has told me, to be polite, that IF there is alien contact, the people all over the planet will revolt in reaction to it for both religious reasons, such as, "The Devil is here, and the Govt. is in cahoots with Satan", and in revenge for being ridiculed, disrespected by the protocol contained in the Robertson Panel, other related protocol that is STILL going on. Those that are religious believe that aliens,UFOs are "of The Devil". Martial Law 00:58, 20 February 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gen Ramey balloon 7-8-47.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gen Ramey balloon 7-8-47.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 08:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are "fair-use" exemptions for this use in a non-profit context. Dr. Fil, please email me through my website (linked through my signed user name at the end of this post), if you have the time to do so.--Michaelsayers 23:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Green fireballs LIFE.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Green fireballs LIFE.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 12:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New organization

The new organization s called Wikipedia:Paranormal Watchers. Here is your invitation, considering the subject matter. Martial Law 04:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Your invite

We would like you to join us. Martial Law 22:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Will you join us ?

Will you join us ? Martial Law 05:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Civility

Regarding comments such as this: Calm down. Accusing others of censorship, especially in such a tone, is not only inappropriate, but prohibited. It is nothing but disruptive to the editing process. If you do not agree with content being added/removed to an article, then discuss it on the basis of the content itself, and do not bring up other editors, their histories, or their possible motives. --InShaneee 23:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need for skepticism II

I read your objection to my edit and have responded in what I hope will be seen as a constructive manner.Rikstar 11:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Arnold_crescent_1947.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arnold_crescent_1947.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:1976 Tehran UFO Pirouzi drawing.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1976 Tehran UFO Pirouzi drawing.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot 03:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gen Ramey Roswell message 1947.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gen Ramey Roswell message 1947.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Buck Rogers green aliens.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Buck Rogers green aliens.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 18:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for improving the UFO article, your work is very much appreciated :-) .

I just wanted to add my thanks for adding the link to the famous Hart UFO photos, and the link to the LIFE magazine UFO article, in the Lubbock Lights page. Given their importance to the Lubbock Lights story, I think it really adds to the article. Again, thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.145.229.162 (talk) 04:24, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to UFO, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Fair use rationale for Image:Alien autopsy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alien autopsy.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shag Harbour Nova Scotia.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Shag Harbour Nova Scotia.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 12:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Halifax Chronicle-Herald 10-7-67.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Halifax Chronicle-Herald 10-7-67.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1948 Top Secret USAF UFO extraterrestrial document.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1948 Top Secret USAF UFO extraterrestrial document.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 18:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About your editing at Unidentified Flying Object

Wikipedia is not for fringe advocacy. You need to re-read WP:V and WP:NPOV and be more careful not to add original research or unverifiable information to Wikipedia as you did here, here, and here. You also need to stop making personal attacks and baiting in edit summaries. [1] Please also be warned of Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Discretionary_sanctions. If there are further violations of policy, I will request arbitration enforcement. Jehochman ^Talk 09:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Unidentified flying object, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ScienceApologist (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul R. Hill for deletion

The article Paul R. Hill is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jps (talk) 17:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion to collaborate on new biographical page re: Paul R Hill

First can I apologise if this is not the correct way to communicate on Wikipedia - this is my first 'edit' and one thing I am sure of is that I haven't got my head around how this is supposed to work yet! I was disappointed to miss the debate on the Paul Hill page deletion. I searched for something about him yesterday and found the page then, and was reflecting on my possible comments overnight, but I was evidently too late. I would be happy to collaborate on a new biographical entry for Hill, but would struggle to do the actual drafting (other than in Word and then sending it to someone who actually understands how this site works!). My impression is that Hill's notability rests in part on his contribution to the developmnent of the US space programme and other elements of his work as an aerodynamacist, which would be of specialist interest to students of the history of the space programme, and of engineering, but to a greater extent on his book ' Unconventional Flying Objects'. The point to me is not if one agrees with Hill's conclusion concerning the ETH or not, nor if that conclusion is controversial or not (the range of topics in the latter category is considerable), but rather that the work is widely referenced by others in the debate concerning UFOs and so biographical information concerning the author would be of interest to this group also. I do not know how this fits the precise criteria of the site, but...Perhaps more significantly I did feel that the original article could have been developed. It would have benefited from many of the references to Hill's engineering and research work you located, and from reducing the amount of content from his book that was included. An important point would be to note the controverial and generally unaccepted status of the ETH and Hill's hypotheses (Condon and Gilmore, 1968 etc. might suffice, although I can't see any specific skeptical reference against Hill's actual work). This could be balanced by noting some of the prominent scientists that have supported the ETH, as you described, such as Hynek, Sturrock, (perhaps also the Deardoff et al 2005 paper in JBIS...?. I will pop back to look at this page over the next few days to see if this idea might be relevance for you. Once again apologise if I have inadevertantly breached any protocols. Anthony Mugan (talk) 10:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Anthony Mugan[reply]

Thanks for the reply - apologies in not realising sooner that it went back to my page (very much a novice at this evidently! I had set it up on the spur of the moment thinking I would draft a Hill page myself as the deletion rather irritated me, but I suspect I should merely be a helper on this one!). Let me know if I can be of any assistance (e.g. comments on drafts etc.) I think your approach is appropriate. One wonders what they would make of Michio Kaku now, given his recent comments!!Anthony Mugan (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Anthony Mugan[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gen Ramey balloon 7-8-47.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gen Ramey balloon 7-8-47.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens.rf 19:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gen Ramey balloon 7-8-47.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gen Ramey balloon 7-8-47.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paul R Hill - possible draft

Hello

A while ago we had a conversation around the Paul R Hill page that got deleted. It's been one of those things I've thought about over the intervening period a few times. I wonder what you think about the following draft? I was wondering if a joint collaboration my be of interest, as you may well have wider sources of information and clearly understand the Wikipedia technicalities much better that I! I have also made use of some of your previous research, for which I feel you should be credited. My email address is educationdata.solutions@virgin.net, or I'll try to keep and eye on my talk page. (The text below has lost all it formating, but I hope it makes sense!).

Paul R Hill Paul Richard Hill (1909-1990) was a “renowned”1 mid – twentieth century American aerodymanicist. He was a leading research and development engineer and manager for NASA (National Aeronautical and Space Administration) and its predecessor, NACA (the National Advisory Council for Aeronautics) between 1939 and 1970, retiring as Associate Chief, Applied Materials and Physics Division at the NASA Langley Research Centre1,2. He is arguably most widely known today as the author of ‘Unconventional Flying Objects: a Scientific Analysis’3 Background Hill was born in Odebolt, Iowa in February 1909 4. After graduating with a B.S. in mechanical engineering from University of California, Berkeley in 1936 he was Professor of Aeronautics at the Polytechnic College of Engineering in Oakland, California for three years before joining the National Advisory Committee of Aeronautics (NACA) in 1939. He continued to work in a range of senior R&D management roles when NACA became the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in 1958 at the NASA Langley Research Centre1. Hill was married to Frances Hoback Hill (d. 1999). They had one daughter, Julie M. Hill.4 Paul Richard Hill died on April 9th 1990 in the James River Regional Convalescent Centre, Newport Mews.4 The Paul R Hill Special Collection is held by the Archives of American Aerospace.1 He was awarded NASA’s Exceptional Service Medal in 19695. This award was “… granted for significant achievement or service characterized by unusual initiative or creative ability that clearly demonstrates substantial improvement in engineering, administative, space flight, or space-related endeavors which contribute to NASA programs”5. In 1970 Hill received a citation for outstanding scientific leadership for “directing research applicable to space laboratories and other spacecraft.”3

NACA and NASA Research

During the second world war Hill co-authored a number of technical NACA papers6,7, focusing on aerodynamic aspects of aircraft performance. Hill was also involved in NACA collaboration with the Republic aircraft company, assisting in the design of the highly successful P-47 fighter. Hill’s specific role was in in the aerodynamic design.3, 8 In the immediate post war period Hill made a number of significant contributions to the development of ram jet technology, including establishing and supervising the Wallops Island ram jet test flight programme3 and authoring the first NACA technical paper on ram jet technology9.

By the early 1950’s, in part inspired by his personal interest in the ‘flying saucer’ or ‘UFO’ phenomenon, Hill began experimenting in his own time with kinesthetically controlled flying platforms3. This led to an official project, which Hill initiated with Charles Zimmerman, who had been independently working on similar concepts for some time10. This project designed and test flew such patforms in collaboration with the United States Air Force, the Royal Canadian Airforce and the US Office of Naval Research. The increased understanding of the aerodynamic and performance characteristics of such platforms informed future design work for the Lunar Landing Module (LM), other VTOL designs and experiments with disc shaped aircraft in the period 3, 10,11,12, 13,.

In the early 1950s Hill was part of a specially-assembled advisory panel of “great men” 14 aerodynamicists advising Sandia Labs on problems encountered with the design of the second generation bombs (H – bombs). In addition to Hill, who at this time headed NACA’s Pilotless Aircraft Division, the “great men” listed by Dr Robert F Brodsky of Sandia Labs in his memoir14 were Jack Northrop (founder of Northrop Aircraft), George Schairer (Chief of aerodynamics at Boeing), Ira H. Abbott (“a legendary engineer”14), Ed Heinemann (Chief engineer Douglas Aircraft), Dr. Alex Charters (“a famous ballistician”14), Al Sibilia (Vought aircraft chief of aerodynamics), Dr. Charles Poor (Chief Scientist Army’s Ballisic Research Laboratory), and “several other distinguished engineers”14. It was Hill and Charters, however, whom Brodsky called the “heroes”14. Hill’s specific contribution was in diagnosing the aerodynamic problems in the bomb design3, 14, though Brodsky acknowledges that at the time they were ignored until a year later when the Sandia scientists realized they were right. “Both experts were correct, but they were too far ahead of us technically”. 14 In 1956 the US Air Force established project HYWARDS, with the aim of developing a hypersonic design capable of up to Mach 12, as a successor to the X-1515. The aerospace historian, James Hansen notes that a number of NACA engineers later joined the initial HYWARDS study group at Langley Research Centre “notably Paul Hill, configuration and propulsion…”15 Hill made a number of important contributions, particularly in the design of hypersonic wind tunnels.3, 16

By 1959 Hill became involved in research for a future lunar mission. A lunar study group was established under the leadership of Clint Brown who asked for the participation of six of “Langley's most thoughtful analysts: David Adamson, Supersonic Aerodynamics Division; Paul R. Hill, PARD; John C. Houbolt, Dynamic Loads Division; Albert A. Schy, Stability Research Division; Samuel Katzoff, Full-Scale Research Division; and Bill Michael of his own Theoretical Mechanics Division”.17 This was one of many study groups to examine a lunar mission during the period, with arguably its major contribution being in initiating the concept of rendevous in orbit between a lander and a main spacecraft.17

Space station research began in earnest at NASA-Langley in the early 1960’s and Hill played a prominent role. The historian James Hansen describes Hill as one of two “ key members of Langley’s early space station research” (along with Robert Osborne).17, 18, with again much of Hill’s pioneering work feeding into later developments.17, 19

“Of all those who contributed to the Moon decision, the ones farthest in the background were the engineers of Langley and Goddard and Marshall, many of whom devoted their lives to spaceflight, designing dreams ...”19

Interest in Unidentified Flying Objects Hill maintained a long-term interest in Unidentified Flying Objects. He had two personal UFO sightings. The first, on July 16th 1952, was with his future wife, Frances Hoback, and was reported to the USAF Blue Book project.20 This sighting was officially classified as aeroplanes as a flight of bombers were in the area.21 The then head of Blue Book, Captain (later Major) Edward Ruppelt was later to write of the case, however, “The only possible solution to the sighting was that the two men (sic) had seen airplanes. We investigated this report and found that there were several B-26's from Langley AFB in the area at the time of the sighting, but none of the B-26 pilots remembered being over Hampton Roads. In fact, all of them had generally stayed well south of Norfolk until about 10:30P.M. because of thunderstorm activity northwest of Langley. Then there were other factors - the observers heard no sound and they were away from all city noises, aircraft don't carry just one or two amber lights, and the distance between the two lights was such that had they been on an airplane the airplane would have been huge or very close to the observers. And last, but not least, the man from the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics was a very famous aerodynamicist and of such professional stature that if he said the lights weren't airplanes they weren't.”22 Hill’s second personal UFO sighting, in 1962, was not reported to Bluebook, but is described in his book.3 Hill was a strong proponent of the extraterrestrial hypothesis, which suggests that some UFOs represent structural craft of extraterrestrial origin. After retiring from NASA he developed his analysis with the aim of demonstrating that those UFOs that are not misidentifications of mundane objects or phenomena, have a coherent and consistent set of performance characteristics that are in line with what is allowable within physical theory. Hill presented his case within his book, ‘Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific Analysis’3. The book was published posthumously, following a number of rejections from publishers during Hill’s life time.23 Whilst ‘Unconventional Flying Objects’ was well received by pro-UFO commentators24 and is widely referenced by pro-UFO writers25,26,27,28 it must be noted that the extraterrestrial hypothesis is not generally accepted and that the mainstream scientific view remains that UFO reports contain nothing of scientific value.29

Interest in psi phenomenon In an interview in 2000 Hill’s daughter, Julie, described her father’s interst in psi research: “He spoke about a friend who was a psychic and experiments they did. He said he set up a pinwheel experiment – I don’t know how, but he knew how to set up an experiment that would be valid – and he told me that for about a week he could turn it with his mind, with his thoughts, but after about a week he couldn’t do it anymore. He also told me a story about being in a car parked on the street, he was into thought experiments, and he said he projected a thought into her mind to get into my car, and as the woman was walking by the car she stopped, opened the door and sat down and looked at him, and I don’t know if she shrieked or what but she was absolutely stunned at what she was doing. He said, I willed her to get into the car, and she did. I think he was as shocked as she was. They were both shocked. He told me when I was in my late teens, and this was before Shirley Maclaine and astral projection, that when he slept, he could float out of his body at night and float on the ceiling and look down and watch himself sleep. He never said he went anywhere or saw fantastic things, just that he left his body and watched himself sleep”.23 None of these experiments were subject to peer review or published in any other way, however.

References: 1. Archives of American Aerospace Exploration, Paul R. Hill Special Collection, MS2010-068; http://spec.lib.vt.edu/aerosp/aerospgd/hill.htm 2. Hansen, J. R., 1986, Engineer in Charge, NASA, p417, http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4305/ 3. Hill, P. R., 1995, Unconventional Flying Objects: a Scientific Analysis, Hampton Roads Publishing Company Inc., Charlotsville, VA. ISBN 1-57174-027-9 4. Obituary of Paul Richard Hill, Hampton Roads (VA) Daily Press - Apr 12, 1990. 5. SP-4012 NASA Historical Data Book: Volume IV, Appendix A: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Honor Awards. http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4012/vol4/appa.htm 6. Brevoort, M. J., Stickle, G. W, Hill, P.R., 1942, ‘Effect of airplane design efficiency and engine economy on range’, NACA. 7. Hill, P.R., Crigler, J. L., 1943, ‘The effect of altitude on bomber performance’, NACA. 8. Naiman, I., Hill, P. R., 1941, ‘The effect of external shape upon the drag of a scoop’, NACA. 9. Hill, P. R., 1946, ‘Parameters determining performance of supersonic pilotless airplanes powered by ram-compression power plants’, NACA. 10. http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Charles_H._Zimmerman , Charles H Zimmerman Wikipedia entry, accessed 9th December 2011. 11. Zimmermann, C. H., Hill, P.R., Kennedy, T.L., 1953, ‘Preliminary experimental investigation of the flight of a person supported by a jet thrust device attached to his feet’, NACA 12. Hill, P. R., Kennedy, T. L., 1954, ‘Flight tests of a man standing on a platform supported by a teetering rotor.’ NACA. 13. Thomas, D. E.,Thomas, D. F., Hill, P. R., 1970, ‘Lunar flying platform simulator’, NASA. 14. Brodsky, R. F., 2006, On the Cutting Edge, Gordian Knot Books, pp31, 45-46. 15. Hansen, J. R., 1986, Engineer in Charge, NASA, Chp 12, http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4305/ch12.htm 16. Hill, P. R., 1957, ‘A method of computing the transient temperature of thick walls from arbitrary variation of adiabatic-wall temperature and heat-transfer coefficient’, NACA 17. Hansen, J. R., 1995, Spaceflight Revolution: NASA Langley Research Center from Sputnik to Apollo, NASA history series SP-4308, http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS69854 18. Hill, P., R., Schnitzer, E., 1962 “Rotating Manned Space Stations.” Astronautics, vol. 7, no. 9, pages 14-18. American Rocket Society. 19. Hall, T., D., 1994, The Architecture of Artificial Gravity Environments for Long Duration Space Habitation, Ph.D Thesis, University of Michigan. 20. Hill – Hoback report of 16th July 1952. Project Bluebook archive pages MAXW-PBB12-435, MAXW-PBB12-436 and MAXW-PBB12-437; www.bluebookarchive.org/ 21. Hill – Hoback report of 16th July 1952 case evaluation. Project Bluebook archive page reference MAXW-PBB12-318; www.bluebookarchives.org/ 22. Ruppelt, E., J., 1956, Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, Doubleday, New York 23. Interview with Julie M Hill, 2000; www.thiemeworks.com/interview-with-julie-hill-daughter-of-paul-r-hill/ 24. Puthoff, H. E., 1997, ‘Synopsis of Unconventional Flying Objects: JSE Review’, Journal of Scientific Exploration. 25. Jacobs, D., M., 2000, UFOs and Abductions: Challenging the Borders of Knowledge, p354, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence KS., ISBN 0-7006-1032-4. 26. Haisch, B. ‘UFO Skeptic’ website, recommended reading page, http://www.ufoskeptic.org/ 27. CUFOS (undated), ‘Getting involved in Ufology’, recommended reading section, http://www.cufos.org/YOU_WANT_TO_BE_A_UFOLOGIST.pdf 28. http://www.hyper.net/ufo.html 29. Condon, E. and Gillmor, D.S. (eds), 1968, Final Report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, Bantam Books

Anthony Mugan (talk) 11:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Anthony Mugan[reply]

wilbert b smith page

hi, i am new to wikipedia, but i noticed you are interested in ufo's and were involved in the wilbert b smith deletion. i think he is a very important person and i am surprised that his page was deleted. i have asked the admin (courcelles) http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wilbert_B._Smith to allow for the article to exist. haven't heard back yet. one thing you may find interesting is that the person who nominated the page for deletion has since been permanently banned from wikipedia. he has nominated for deletion and deleted content from numerous clean tech pages, environmentalists and it seems he may be an agent of oil and gas interests (and perhaps other interests as well since he was so keen to delete wilbert smith's page) who knows? anyways he has been out'ed.

if you have any further ideas about getting the wilbert smith page back up i'd be interested to hear. Let's see if this tilde~ thing works BioEMF (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Chicago Sun 1947-06-26-2 Flying Saucer headline-th.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Sun 1947-06-26-2 Flying Saucer headline-th.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:First flying saucer headline, Chicago Sun, June 26, 1947.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:First flying saucer headline, Chicago Sun, June 26, 1947.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:First "flying saucer" use in headline from Chicago Sun, June 26, 1947.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:First "flying saucer" use in headline from Chicago Sun, June 26, 1947.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ruppelt Ramey Samford 1952-07-29.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ruppelt Ramey Samford 1952-07-29.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rendlesham Forest incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief of the Defence Staff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ruppelt Ramey Samford 1952-07-29.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ruppelt Ramey Samford 1952-07-29.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:37, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion concerning your contributions

Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Portage County UFO Chase

I'm considering opening a full investigation into your edits for violations of WP:FRINGE policy.

jps (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tombaugh Lapaz 3 3 1954.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tombaugh Lapaz 3 3 1954.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tulsa Saucers July12 1947.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tulsa Saucers July12 1947.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Test dummies.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Test dummies.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 00:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]