User talk:Dr Aaij/Archive 2

Question

How do I get to the requested articles?Dante2326 (talk) 06:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Dante[reply]

Dante2326, I don't know what you mean with "requested articles". I asked you all to find a press release, a company website, a blog. If that's what you mean, look on the internet.
Anyway, you weren't in class, so I'll tell you this way--if you want more credit for the assignments you've missed in the first two weeks, it has to be done this week. Dr Aaij (talk) 04:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you.Dante2326 (talk) 18:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Dante[reply]

Prepex

Dear Dr. Aiij, I am an epidemiologist and new to Wikipedia. I have been working on the circumcision device articles and appreciate your edit to the Prepex article. There are many primary citations in the article besides the one you noted. Would you be willing to review those as well? Thanks PeterPetersmillard (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that's sort of outside my jurisdiction right now--my students and I saw a problem with the somewhat extraordinary claim that so many millions of lives would be saved through male circumcision. I haven't looked at the history of the article, so I don't know if I'm messing with your work, if you know what I mean, but in general I can say that Wikipedia articles need to be based on secondary sourcing, esp. when strong claims are made. So if you run into primary sources that do much more than simply confirm a somewhat obvious fact, I urge you to look into the matter, either by tagging or by adding secondary sources. I hope that helps, Dr Aaij (talk) 18:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It is in fact not an extraordinary claim at all, but I take your point about sources!Petersmillard (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Petersmillard, I just looked at the source--it wasn't "saving" so many lives, it said preventing so many infections. See my edit. Thank you, Dr Aaij (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Perfect. They were really stretching the truth there (and in much of the rest of the article, too...)Petersmillard (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no. Now you got me thinking. Here from WP:MDS A primary source in medicine is one in which the authors directly participated in the research or documented their personal experiences. They examined the patients, injected the rats, filled the test tubes, or at least supervised those who did. Many, but not all, papers published in medical journals are primary sources for facts about the research and discoveries made. A secondary source in medicine summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources, usually to provide an overview of current understanding of the topic, to make recommendations, or to combine results of several studies. Examples include literature reviews or systematic reviews found in medical journals, specialist academic or professional books, and medical guidelines or position statements published by major health organizations. IMHO, UNAIDS is an authoritative source and therefore a secondary source. Petersmillard (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have my doubts about that. I do not believe that UNAIDS is a health organization in the sense of WP:MEDRS (though I'm sure someone like SlimVirgin knows that better than me), and what's being cited there (last note in Prepex#History) is hardly a review study or meta-analysis--it's a press release. Dr Aaij (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Titles

Can you help me with my titles?Dante2326 (talk) 18:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Dante[reply]

Wiki Links

I want to add a link to witchcraft on my article on User:YoungWizard/Azande witchcraft, but the article on witchcraft has multiple issues. Should I use the link anyway or leave it be? YoungWizard (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made a tweak or two to the draft; go have a look. (Note also I tweaked the link above--it went to the talk page, and piping wasn't necessary here.) Dr Aaij (talk) 05:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:Secret Nine

Hello Dr Aaij. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Secret Nine, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G2 cannot be applied in userspace. Thank you. So Why 16:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SoWhy, can you find another reason to delete it? User:Secret Nine doesn't exist, and the redirect came about because a student simply moved something to the wrong space (and under the wrong title). Thanks, Dr Aaij (talk) 18:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. I was thrown by the gadget I use which displayed the user symbol. What you are looking for is WP:CSD#U2. I deleted those pages. Regards So Why 20:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:SoWhy--I was in the classroom trying to multitask, meaning I got most everything wrong. Dr Aaij (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Montgomery Industrial School for Girls

Montgomery Industrial School for Girls has been proded. Just wanted to bring it to your attention in case you weren't aware and would want to take some sort of action (e.g. userfication for preservation). I'm not sure if it meets WP:NSCHOOL. Best Regards, — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 13:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Godsy. It will surely pass the GNG--if only it had been ready to go live. I appreciate the note! Dr Aaij (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hi, Dr. Aaij. I looked at your recent edits on Azande witchcraft. So if two sentences next to each are related and from the same source, I don't have to put citations for both of them? YoungWizard (talk) 19:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, yes. You put a footnote at the end of a word, phrase, sentence, set of sentences, paragraph, whatever it is that you got from that source. Makes for much easier reading too! Say, do the Azande practice Vaginal steaming? Dr Aaij (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure, but I just loaned book on the Azande from the library so I will check for that. YoungWizard (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Mary Ivy Burks at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dr Aaij. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Ivy Burks.
Message added 02:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Ivy Burks

On 16 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Ivy Burks, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Mary Ivy Burks has been called the "mother of Alabama wilderness"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Ivy Burks. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for James Sullivan (Medal of Honor)

On 18 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Sullivan (Medal of Honor), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Peter Van Hoesen, an American Civil War deserter, was paid $300 to enlist by a drafted man, and performed a Medal of Honor-worthy deed at Fort Fisher in 1864 for which he got no credit? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Sullivan (Medal of Honor). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New article

Hey Dante2326, how about this? Dr Aaij (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dr.Aij, I just wrote an article on a WW II ace http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Joseph_Paskoski and am a little confused with setting up the references and making sure they are done properly. I was also wondering if it is acceptable to use a picture of him i found off google images. thanks for the help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelgav09 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michaelgav09, I see you never returned to this article, though five different editors came by to help out... Dr Aaij (talk) 02:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haha

I was the one who made that link. (No worries about your removal - I almost didn't add it.) LadyofShalott 04:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're a cat person, aren't you. Dr Aaij (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, yes! In related matters, I disagree with you about a similar link elsewhere.

Hmm OK, Lady--I gladly submit, like a good doggie. Thanks for the note, and thanks for all your help this semester. Dr Aaij (talk) 14:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Sidney C. Wolff

Hello! Your submission of Sidney C. Wolff at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sidney C. Wolff

On 17 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sidney C. Wolff, which you recently nominated. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sidney C. Wolff. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—David Levy 03:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Rabbits' Wedding

On 19 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Rabbits' Wedding, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in 1959, an Alabama state senator said a children's book about two fuzzy rabbits, The Rabbits' Wedding, was "propaganda for integration and intermarriage" and tried to get the book banned? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Rabbits' Wedding. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Baigongguan and Zhazidong

Hello! Your submission of Baigongguan and Zhazidong at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 16:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dr Aaij. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]