User talk:Disinterested spectator

Welcome!

Hello, Disinterested spectator! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 01:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Disinterested spectator, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Disinterested spectator! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I think you're a bit confused on the definition of terms like Indo-Persian. As an adjective, it is used to describe aspects of Persian culture which were integrated into that of India, particularly from the time of the first Muslim invasions in the 12th century and especially after the Mughal era. I have sources to back me up on this, and at least one goes as far as saying "the Mughals gave birth to Indo-Persian culture". Many of the weapons which you labelled as Indo-Persian actually have no connection to Persia at all. For example the chakram and gada pre-date Persian influence while the pata and bagh naka were never (or at least rarely) used by Indo-Persian people. Some of the weapons you labelled such as the katar and maduvu are Dravidian weapons with no relation to Indo-Persian culture except for the katar being adopted by Mughals. Going by your edits and your description on the disambig, it seems you have your own definition of the term, which appears to be "anything from Persia and India". This is incorrect in all aspects of what constitutes Indo-Persian culture. The Taj Mahal is an example of Indo-Persian architecture, but the stupas of Sanchi in India and the palace of Ardashir in Iran are not. Just because something is Indian or Persian does not make it Indo-Persian. Morinae (talk) 12:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• Hello Morinae, I am not "confused" at all, there are two uses for the term "Indo-Persian" when it comes to armor and weapons, while your definition is correct, it is also correct to group all Indian, Ottoman, Persian weapons together under the umbrella category of "Indo-Persian". This term has taken the place of "Oriental, Eastern, Islamic" etc and is used to make it easier to find these weapons. This is the same method used by Wikimedia Commons to categorize their images so why not use it here as well? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Indo-Persian_weapons If you feel so strongly that this is wrong then we can discuss this matter on the talk page. First try doing a google search for "Indo-Persian weaons" and see what turns up. [1]Disinterested spectator (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

As a matter of fact, I do feel strongly that this is wrong. I was unaware that Wikimedia Commons categorizes images in this way, but I will certainly correct that as well. And please don't use the lazy method of a google search to justify a mistake. Let's continue this on the talk page. Morinae (talk) 10:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Seeing as you haven't responded in over a week, I'll correct the category and remove it from aticles where it does not apply. Please finish with this discussion before re-adding it. Morinae (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

• • You have obviously made up your mind and I can see that you believe that you have the only true and correct answer (in the typical Wikipedi fashion), you seem unwilling to listen to any views other than your own so go right ahead and do what you want, happy now?Disinterested spectator (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Disinterested spectator. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)