User talk:Delirium333

Delirium333, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Delirium333! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Delirium333, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sugbumap.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sugbumap.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Lucbuan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Republic of Lucbuan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Republic of Lucbuan (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Republic of Lucbuan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Republic of Lucbuan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

I absolutely love this map you made in http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Cebu_(historical_polity)!!!! http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:Sugbumap.png

Arrokoth486958 (talk) 17:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 10:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your edit to General Luna, Quezon has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 21:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Republic of Lucbuan (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qwerfjkl were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Republic of Lucbuan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Republic of Lucbuan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

―Qwerfjkl talk 19:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Republic of Lucbuan

Hello, Delirium333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Republic of Lucbuan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Calumpitbattlemap.png

Thanks for uploading File:Calumpitbattlemap.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Republic of Lucbuan (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Magsaysay, Palawan. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Citations 2 and 4 are not suitable as a reference as they are Facebook and a Blog which are user published and not a reliable source (see WP:RS). Reference 1 is a PDF which is a partial extract of a research document which needs to be referenced based on where it was originally published by Dr. Nilo Ocampo and Prof. Renato Constantino. Looking at Google Scholar perhaps it is something like 'Ocampo, Nilo S. "A history of Palawan." Palawan at the crossroads: Development and the environment on a Philippine frontier (1996): 23-37.' but further confirmation would be required. Contents would fit nicely into a history section on Magsaysay, Palawan.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Republic of Lucbuan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Republic of Lucbuan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Youtube Subscriber

Hey it's me, Rene your Youtube subscriber. I talked to you in Youtube, nice to find your real account here! Regards! -Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 04:42, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Republic of Lucbuan

Hello, Delirium333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Republic of Lucbuan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposals for your map designs

Hello! Just wanted to say I admire your work with maps, they're beautifully done and appreciate the continued efforts in maintaining historical accuracy. I hope you don't mind some proposals that could nonetheless improve them even just a bit.

Since non-Hispanized states and other settlements in the Philippine archipelago are based on riverine and other water transport, I think it would highlight some topics like the Mindanao sultanates better with a more elaborate display of the river systems, though not too visibly pronounced. The main rivers could be shown the thickest with thinner tributaries, like this map of French Indochina in 1838. Showing wetland areas that constantly shift water levels (like Ligusan Marsh) would also be helpful. Deltas too.

Additionally, since contrasting lowlander-highlander social dynamics are common throughout Philippine societies, it would probably be important to highlight mountain ranges in a more detailed relief style, like in this map of the Oman Empire, but somewhat more pronounced. Would help with river displays too.

For more specific proposals, I have two ideas that you could work with either or: re-add Buayan into the map of the Sultanate of Maguindanao and mark that particular territory with a specific time period along with the Lanao area among others, or just rework a bit under the time period either Kudarat or Barahaman rule instead of in 1521, since the said reigns of the aforementioned Sultans would be considered the maximum extent of Maguindanao rule and influence.

Since non-Hispanized states also don't draw borders, a faded, gradient color display of their territories would be nicer touch

Nowhere near as important as any of the ideas above but some kind of light pastel blue would be a nicer color for the waters imo Isangtalong (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Castilian War

Hello. May i revert the Infobox to my one before Danial Bass edited the Infobox. Because your Infobox is abit incorrect. The Ottoman Flag is wrong because if you see Battle of Çıldır page you will see the flag is has completely red background with a yellow crest. Thank you. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 11:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also. Brunei was historically called "Borneo" before Castilian War Happened Syazwi Irfan (talk) 05:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also. Brunei was historically called "Borneo" before Castilian War Happened. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

for the ottoman flag i wont try to dispute that, thank you for correcting me

for brunei, for me i think its better to use the term bruneian because thats how the bruneians called their state, borneo is more of a european term. plus in that case then we would also be calling romania "rumania" because thats how they were historically called but it might confuse people a lot more. it wouldnt be wrong to use the term borneo but it might be a bit confusing especially because we associate borneo more with the whole island in the modern day Delirium333 (talk) 13:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanna change it. its okay just notify me. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 09:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sultanate of Buayan

Hello, please use reliable, academic sources when adding text. You can read more about that here: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Please do not restore your last edits. Glennznl (talk) 06:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i will restore it because they are reliable. and the author of an article from opinion.inquirer.net is the director of the Bureau of Public Information of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao. please refrain from removing my edits. thank you :D Delirium333 (talk) 06:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An opinion piece is not a reliable source no matter who the author is. And how is a director of the Bureau of Public Information a reliable source for historic information? If you continue, you will be reported and possibly blocked. --Glennznl (talk) 06:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sultanate of Buayan, you may be blocked from editing. --Glennznl (talk) 06:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

disrupt, thats a funny term to use. alright alright, the inquirer articles are removed (by the way only one of them was from an opinion, and it does not justify removing all the edits that actually had "academic sources". for the sake of finishing this war, because apparently it seems that you are resorting to useless threats. block from editing? serious? Delirium333 (talk) 07:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are not "useless threats", users can be reported and blocked in this situation, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. But if you can add reliable sources instead of news/opinion pieces, there is no problem at all. --Glennznl (talk) 07:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The German and Norwegian versions of the article list a couple of sources that might be useful for you. --Glennznl (talk) 07:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

alright. anyway, the inquirer sources were replaced with a book called the philippine islands by john foreman (1899), where in page 141 it mentions the same event. for baratamay section, a paragraph sourced from inquirer has been removed. while extremely disappointed earlier, i hope that this will settle our dispute and may there be no edit war again. thank you. Delirium333 (talk) 07:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you for fixing the issue. I understand that you felt disappointed earlier because you created the page, but my only intention is to keep Wikipedia as reliable as possible, so there was no ill will towards you :) --Glennznl (talk) 07:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you too. i apologize for reacting a bit salty earlier. now that things have calmed down ive gained a bit of empathy. now, i can understand why you were disappointed with the lack of academic sources. Delirium333 (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Philippine Barnstar of National Merit
		Thank you for correcting misinformation especially when it comes to pre-colonial polities and the good quality maps. You're a real one! Gumen12 (talk) 13:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~}

Gumen12 (talk) 13:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sealofdatuutto.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sealofdatuutto.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Moro War

Hi! Can you help us give some sources you used to edit the Spanish moro conflict wikipedia page? We're also trying to improve it and we need to fact check the sources. 158.62.25.89 (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

most of the edits i made were only about the grammar, as well as a paragraph from the sultanate of buayan page, which included references. unfortunately i havent done much research regarding the validity of the content in that page but it must have come from a book or an old spanish document that might be searchable somewhere. when i have the time i want to help make serious changes too Delirium333 (talk) 14:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your edit to Datu Piang has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 19:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Governor of Quirino

A tag has been placed on Category:Governor of Quirino indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i would like to apologize, i made a mistake with the categories. i will not oppose the deletion Delirium333 (talk) 04:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]