User talk:Dbunkley6

What A Girl Wants-Aguilera

I have no idea why you blank your talk page of warnings as you are likelier to get blocked. Anyway, if you paid any attention you would realize that the album version was one of the first recordings for her debut in the first half of 1998, NOT EVEN 1999 as by January 1999 the album was nearly finished. Please check that an addition will be 100% correct before adding it next time.Carmaker1 (talk) 03:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are asking for trouble

That is a personal attack and can be reported. I clearly made the change stating the recording date of June 1998 for the album version, not 1999. You obviously didn't as I also provided all the recording dates for most of her other early singles and the 1999 album's recording period. Please monitor how you conduct yourself as your previous conduct has not been going on well with other users. A good of amount your contributions are beneficial, but your record isn't so pleasant. Good day.Carmaker1 (talk) 03:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay

Glad to know that this is resolved. I hope I wasn't too abrasive, but I feel I have to stand up for myself towards the possibility of being belittled. If you want a fresh talk page you can delete my comments, but removing warnings(only administrator given) is a dangerous risk I wouldn't recommend. We should all try to provide sources or explanations for edits as much as we can.Carmaker1 (talk) 03:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you.Candy o32 21:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.Candy o32 21:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Genres, again

Please do not switch around genres without discussing first. Unless you can find a reliable source that shows This Is My Time classifies as neo soul, then please stop adding it. - eo (talk) 23:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

see you again

[see you again] [see you again 2] [[http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B001O1Z090/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=77197031&s=dmusic see you)

Genres

STOP! changing genres without citing a reliable source. If you do not stop you may be banned or blocked from editing. This is your final warning. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. If its not sourced its not WP:V, which all content must be. Whatever you or I may think the song is ... we are not the ones to classify its genre. Its not even electrohop if anything its Electropop, Dancehall etc. but those are not sourced. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You still dont understand the point hear. No one is saying that Electrohop doesn't exist. What I AM SAYING is "unless a source calls 'Woohoo' electrohop, neither you OR no one else can claim that it is". End of. So please stop making this into an issue... and next time you write on my talk page sign it using four tilds ~~~~ This is also applies to any other song where you have attempted to change the genres too. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Hannah Montana Forever. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinary Girl

First of all, don't be sorry for anything. You haven't done anything wrong. We've all been beginners once. Experience will help. And per WP:NFCC policy's third point opposes to having two covers. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 18:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regularly, you would do the following: on the left-hand side there are several options. Under the "Toolbox" category, the option is "Upload file". Click it. Then click the words "upload form" in the sentence "If you are familiar with our image policies and already know which license applies, go directly to the upload form", located right under the salmon box. Then there you are, ready to upload. However you should read this to know what to do when uploading album or single covers. In your case, since the "Backflip" cover is already uploaded, just go to the image's page and click "Upload a new version of this file" under the File history section. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:24, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please refrain from changing music genres without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Continued genre changes to suit your own point of view may result in a block. Thank you.Candy o32 20:29, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Can't Be Tamed, you will be blocked from editing. Tbh®tch^Talk ^© 20:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Rose Colored Glasses (Kelly Rowland song), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 21:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie B / Melanie Brown

The correct name of the artist is Melanie B, why did you move the articles? --Richhoncho (talk) 11:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/keep-it-movin-feat-big-meech/id270958412

December 2010

I don't know if you got the memo earlier, BUT IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A SOURCE FOR WHEN A SONG WAS RECORDED, PLEASE STOP ADDING THE YEARS IN SONG INFOBOXES. Candy o32 - Merry CHRISTmas :) 22:03, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here and its not just that page, most of your edits to Wikipedia are adding years to recording dates. If you do not have a reliable source for these days PLEASE DO NOT ADD. Candy o32 - Merry CHRISTmas :) 20:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

This is your last warning about unsourced changes to genres.

Any genre of a song or album must be sourced from reliable sources. Genres cannot be listed due to personal or public opinion, or due to the charts which a song or album appears on. This has been explained to you a number of times yet you appear to be not hearing it. You have made little or not attempt to engage in any discussion about genre changes and leave me no choice but to issue this final warning. The next time you make an unsourced or unreferenced change to a genre you will be taken to the administrators noticeboard where I will advocate that administrators need to become involved in the situation as you are brining wikipedia into disrepute. Note than consistent disruption of this sort is punishable by blocking or banning users indefinitely. Note this warning also applies to your numerous additions of unsourced recording dates. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not stalking you but we do edit a lot of the same pages. If it isn't me warning you it would be someone else. At the end of the day your edits are wrong and hence you've been warned. I have not stalked you. Merely warned you like I do others when they edit incorrectly. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 19:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course... when there is sources which are reliable you can change things. Now as for the favor? what would you like me to do? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

can you show me: 1) which articles you wish to upload them for, 2) which sources are they from? If i deem them appropriate I will do them for you but only if you learn how to do it for next time. :) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these covers are alternative covers and most alternative covers are not allowed per WP:NFCC #8. Candy o32 - Happy New Year :) 23:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid alternative covers are not usually allowed per the link given above by Candyo32. International copyright laws only allow us to upload one cover as its a non-free image. Sometimes multiple covers are appropriate where there sufficient additional context to be gained from it. additionally the sources provided are not good. (bar amazon). -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:36, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

However the sources you've taken the covers from are not clear or reliable. When you upload covers or any image you are always asked for a source. In the end it would boil down to a copyright infringement as there is no way in proving they are official. As such because it is a matter of international law I'll refrain from getting involved on this occassion. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bigger Article

Try searching Google News for reliable sources. That's where I always start. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

I don't know if I have told you this before but airplay is not a format of release. But I know I have told you this before I F Y O U DO N O T HAVE A SOURCE FOR A DATE A SONG WAS RECORDED DO NOT ADD IT, WE DO NOT KNOW WHEN IT WAS RECORDED. ' I know I have told you this several, several times before so now I will conclude that you continue to add these dates to articles just for the heck of it. Candy o32 20:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About these warnings

One more strike and you're out!!

You've now received final warnings for two separate issues. Consider that the last final warning you'll receive without repercussions. Next time administrators will be notified and you will be sanctioned with a block or ban. I can't make it any clearer... — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Lullaby

Your recent contributions to the Goodbye Lullaby have been reverted as they appear to be vandalism (restoring an old version of the page, thus, removing countless contributors' edits). Your edit summaries only cite a change in date format (from DMY to MDY), but your reason only explains that "it's stupid".

Avril Lavigne is of Canadian descent and so all of her articles have been created in Canadian English. Part of this editing style includes date format, which is Day-Month-Year. If you wish to start a discussion on the article to convert it back to American English, please do. But until proper discussion takes place, the current style should remain as that is the established consensus. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Stalking....

I haven't spoken to you in over three weeks... :S — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: I Thought I Lost You cover

Here is it: http://images.wikia.com/disneychannel/images/d/da/I_Thought_I_Lost_You_-Single_Cover_Art.jpg

Sadly, one contributor called it "fan-made cover" :( Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 09:34, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks

No more of this. You've been here long enough to understand that personal attacks are prohibited, and you've also been here long enough to know how to check an account's contribution history and see the Juanacho hasn't edited in 6 weeks.—Kww(talk) 02:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to We R Who We R. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 17:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Add it again you'll be blocked from editing. Ive told you, no source says specifically when the song was written or recorded. Anything added will be a violation of WP:OR and WP:SNYTH. Knock it off. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 18:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Man Down

It is the official cover. Rihanna tweeted it herself confirming it. Do not change again. calvin999 (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here. Can't get much better than MTV. calvin999 (talk) 17:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Would u mind sticking to the same title you first made on my talk page instead of creating a new one for every question please. calvin999 (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It hasn't charted on the Hot 100, but the page for Bubbling Under is offline, so we can't see where it is on that chart. I don't think the individual page for Man Down on Billboard.com reports charting on the Bubbling Under though. calvin999 (talk) 22:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article protection

Submit a request at WP:RFPP.—Kww(talk) 18:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it Man Down that you want to lock? calvin999 (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want a lock on '4'?? It's only going to be added to in the coming month/2 months. There is no need for one. calvin999 (talk) 19:16, 23 May 2011 (UTC). But there was some album articles that had been secured 1-2 months b4 the album was released.[reply]

Means that it is semi-protected and only established users are able to edit. You can't lock an article from everyone. That is basically incubation, and there is no need for the album article to be semi protected. It's not being edited all the time, I know because it is on my watch-list. calvin999 (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes..?calvin999 (talk) 19:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even know who they are. If you can't find anything, how am I supposed to? Did it occur to you that as the song was released 5 years ago that any articles written about it are long gone or very hard to find. There may not be any reviews that are easily accessible now because it charted so poorly. To be honest, the page doesn't even need one, it's not a major song article which requires major coverage. calvin999 (talk) 20:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anything about the group or song. You'l just have to google it. calvin999 (talk) 20:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The locations for recording are usually found in the linear notes and info on the album. Websites don't usually report where the song was recorded. calvin999 (talk) 20:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Fearless (Taylor Swift album). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caldorwards4 (talk) 21:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Danny Devito do not seem to be constructive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Span (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, it was the edits of the IP before you I was reverting. Sorry. Best wishes Span (talk) 19:32, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Loose (Nelly Furtado album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 21:16, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Battlefield (song). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 03:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rihanna. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 12:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Rihanna, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This edit summary is completely innapropriate. If you had added the reliable source to the article, to corroborate the content - we wouldn't be here, now would we? -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 12:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I removed the cover of China Anne McClain's version of "Dynamite" because the picture was a red link. If there's no picture, you don't add a red link, you're supposed to remove it. You can try uploading the picture again and then add it to the page. Easy4me (talk) 16:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pound the Alarm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All Access (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Good Girl Gone Bad, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to We Need a Resolution. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 23:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| title15 = Direct Contact feat. [[Demi Lovato]])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

edit summary

Another one like this will be quickly followed by a block.—Kww(talk) 01:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, it doesn't work that way. You can't get an administrator to stop warning you about misbehaviour by telling them to leave you alone. Like I said, another edit summary like the one noted above will result in a block. It's really pretty simple: if you don't want to be blocked, don't call people "fucking retards" in your edit summaries.—Kww(talk) 23:54, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Kww. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 15:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As @Kww: requested, please do not patronize other editors by calling them "Dumbasses" like you did here or any other insult in edit summaries. Wikipedia is not a place to belittle others. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for misuse of edit summaries. Any admin can unblock when editor agrees to stop referring to others as "dumbasses", "retards", or similar terms in edit summaries.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 15:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]