User talk:David Gleason

Welcome!

Hello, David Gleason! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: AllStarLink (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AllStarLink and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, David Gleason! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi KylieTastic, Thanks for looking at my article draft so quickly, I think I had only posted it minutes earlier. That was the first AfC I've submitted so I was not aware of the requirements at first, and had submitted only 2 short paragraphs and a handful of citations, with the intent of expanding it later. Having then familiarized myself with the process I greatly expanded the article draft over a period of several days and it's now about 5 times the size with 3 times as many citations. It's now been about 4 days since I last updated it so I just thought I would reply and see if you could take another look. If not, I totally understand and I'm sure another reviewer will get to it in due time. Thanks, David David Gleason (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AllStarLink (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AllStarLink and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi Stuartyeates, Thanks for the feedback. I made the requested changes and found some additional independent sources. As it has now been over 3 months and I've heard nothing further, just thought I would reply and ask if you could take another look. Thank you. David Gleason (talk) 05:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AllStarLink (June 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sources are either not independent or not reliable (blogs, forums, etc.).

S0091 (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:AllStarLink has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AllStarLink. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you mentioned "Can't see a single reliable independent source here?". Starting at the top of the citations list, how is CQ Magazine not reliable or independent? CQ Magazine has been in publication since 1945 (CQ Amateur Radio) and they have no affiliation with AllStarLink. Thank you David Gleason (talk) 19:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:AllStarLink

Hello, David Gleason. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AllStarLink, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:AllStarLink

Hello, David Gleason. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AllStarLink".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)