User talk:Darkage7

Utah

You're right - thanks for the edit. CecilupkiaCecilupkia (talk) 18:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with edits. Hopefully the redo will be a balance of photos and a nice looking article for Utah. Thanks for the input. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Staplegunther (talk • contribs) 05:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UTA TRAX

Hi, I noticed your contributions to UTA TRAX. The Light rail in North America has a section dedicated to SLC's light rail system but it is not written. What's needed is a 1-2 paragraph summary of the whole light rail system if you'd like to write it. Cheers.--Loodog (talk) 00:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gummi bears

This page has had lots of name changes. No one is going to be right. But now all the useful Talk Page discussion is gone, and so the changes will simply continue as new Wikipedians stumble over the page and, seeing no discussion of the name, will "fix it" to the new spelling, again. Please, while you're fixing things up, will you make sure to keep the discussion intact? --DigitalGadget 10:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really, the best thing to do (in my mind, anyway) is to suggest the page be renamed and gather opinions. As I mentioned, it's been Gummi Bear before, as well as other things. I'm not into changing page names myself - I prefer to focus on adding content - so I don't know how to accomplish it :) You could add a Help tag and have someone more experienced help move it --DigitalGadget 07:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move request in process

Essentially the move has happened but the back end has not. I've put in a request under uncontroversial moves to have an admin look at restoring archives and ensure all redirects from other articles and projects still work. Benjiboi 07:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improving Facebook to Featured Article status

I am currently working on improving Facebook to Featured Article status, and I noticed that you have made substantial contributions to the article recently. If you have time, I would appreciate it if you could help out and improve the article. Some comments by other editors have been left at the peer review, Wikipedia:Peer review/Facebook/archive2, so feel free to address those issues, also. Thanks for your time! Gary King (talk) 08:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work on Risk (game)

I wanted to say that I commend you for reverting a recent edit on Risk (game) which merely added a link to an online clone of Risk. I've been fighting that a lot on this page and had to clean up the "Computer implementations and video games" section several times when people have added links to unofficial clones. It's just very nice to see somebody else who is protecting this page in the same way I am. I thank you. Cheers! -Thunderforge (talk) 02:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Utah State OCW

No problem. It really was BAD. I hope I was able to describe what the original author was attempting to describe. I have little actual knowledge on the subject, but tried to read through some of his links to see what he was talking about. At least now it is readable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treesap (talk • contribs) 19:41, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input

Hiya Darkage7, I want to thank you for your words on Some guy's talk page. What's with that guy, huh? :-\ --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 08:25, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no prob. Maybe he's just having a bad day. Good luck with that situation. DaRkAgE7 _[Talk] 03:59, 13 October

2008 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boeing Dreamlifter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UPS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bite Me Bambi (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bite Me Bambi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Darkage7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Beckinsale

Please stop. We don't list relatives in the infobox unless they have Wikipedia article to show their notability. If you think she's notable then WP:WTAF. You have been undone on this at least three times now, and you have been around long enough that I should not have to point you to WP:EW and WP:BRD. Meters (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I feel like I could say the same thing to you. As far as I can tell, you're making up notability requirements that don't exist. To quote WP:Template:Infobox_person under relatives:

> Names of siblings or other relatives; include only if independently notable and particularly relevant. Include the relationship in parentheses after the name (sister, uncle, etc.). For multiple entries, use an inline list.

It says independently notable. Does not say "must already have an article about them". I provided reasons why I believe them to be notable and worth listing, and the information itself was reliably sourced. You pointed me to WP:WTAF, but that article doesn't say all material and names mentioned anywhere on the site must have an article, to me it just says avoid adding red links, which I didn't do. As an aside, Lily Mo Sheen does exist, it just redirects to her mother's page. That's why I felt it was important to include in the first place.

Finally, I was trying to make a good-faith edit, which I believe I approached with sources and rules. It's unfortunate that you disagree. I'll drop the matter, it's not worth it to me to spend time fighting to improve a site that doesn't want to be improved. Darkage7 _[Talk] 21:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bite Me Bambi

Hello, Darkage7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bite Me Bambi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bite Me Bambi

Hello, Darkage7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bite Me Bambi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]