Jump to content

User talk:Danny-w

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hi, Danny-w, Welcome to Wikipedia!


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar
None

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page.

Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

  • If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
  • If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Matani2005 Talk05:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I moved your question to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships and answered it there. Gdr 12:42, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Karlsruhe

[edit]

Hi, you added informations about the jewish community in Karlsruhe to the article. Do you remember the source, I would like to take the information into the city-wiki of Karlsruhe. Nowadays we have a new synagogue, a picture can be found in the city-wiki of Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe:Bild:Synagoge Luft.jpg. --Kawana 17:32, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Hi and thank you. I translated (briefly) from the Hebrew Wikipedia. Most of the article over there speaks about the extincted jewish communuty in Karlsruhe [1]

I don't see the source in the wiki text. However, a search in google - brought me to these links:

A. An article about the Jewish community in the city. [2] (in german).

B. The article "Juden in Karlsruhe" (in german), over here : [3]

C. The german film "Alle Juden raus!" - here: [4]

D. The personal story of Hanne, here: [5]

and so forth.
See also in google - with the words "jews" (or "juden")+ "Karlsruhe" [6]
Danny-w 19:54, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Kawana 20:31, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Favela Ben Ateva.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 14:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See an explanation here [7]. Danny-w 19:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Still need to state the actual license - GFDL, CC, whatever. My Hebrew is rusty :-) so I can't tell what the he: page says for license. It's important to replicate the license info here, sometimes the original image disappears and then there's nothing to refer to. Stan 03:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

--Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The body artist dellilo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 09:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see this image is a BOOK COVER. Danny-w 12:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Sugihara_stamp.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sugihara_stamp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I thought stamps are permitted for use - for educational non commercional purpose.
Details are here:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Faroe_stamps

If you think it's illegal or wrong purpose - you might erase it.
Danny-w

License tagging for Image:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

The tag "bookCover" was put. Danny-w 19:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Peselamenora.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Peselamenora.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 16:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Favela Ben Ateva.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Favela Ben Ateva.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 16:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Duch sheperd.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Duch sheperd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 16:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The picture was taken from the same article in the hebrew wikipdia [8]. It is written in hebrew (as I wrote over there) [9]that it was taken with permision from the israeli site "MyPet" [10]. The permision was given to a fair use. Danny-w 12:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Deathofamonk hilu.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Deathofamonk hilu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image is a BOOK-COVER image, in an article discussing the specific Book. I didn't understand what exactly the problem is. Danny-w 22:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As written at the top of the page, a generic template tag is NOT a valid fair use rationale. Please see Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline -- lucasbfr talk 08:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The tag was fixed. Danny-w 22:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tired of it!! If you (the bot and its operator) think the use in the The Stranger's book-cover image does not suitable to the definition of "fair use", in the article The Stranger itself, then do whatever you want and delete it. Danny-w 19:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The tag was fixed. Danny-w 07:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tarzan and His Mate 2.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tarzan and His Mate 2.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 04:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This time I'm really tired of it. The explanation is in the text itself. Please delete the image. I won't upload anymore pictures to the English wikipedia. Danny-w 18:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lost Language of Cranes BookCover.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lost Language of Cranes BookCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected it and added the right explanation. Thanks. Danny-w (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The body artist dellilo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The body artist dellilo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The description was clarified. Thank you. Danny-w (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamison - anquite mind.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The description was clarified. Danny-w (talk) 12:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beaufort (novel) in the original

[edit]

Greetings, Danny! In your edit to this newly created page, I see you deleted the transliteration of the original title in Hebrew. I believe this information might prove helpful, along with the subsequent reference to the Hebrew novel (with its original title) as the winner of the Israeli literary prizes (Sapir, Yitzhak Sadeh). Remember, "Beaufort" as a title was unknown at those junctures. Therefore I would like to restore it, or would you kindly explain to me whether it's proscribed in the Manual of Style or elsewhere. If you translate from Hebrew, perhaps you'd be willing to expand the page from that source? (see the Talk page as to why I won't :-) Also, please remember to italicize titles in running text, and to boldface only in the first line. -- Thanks, Deborahjay (talk) 23:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I found a way to neatly include the transliterated Hebrew title by formatting a Bibliography section and cleaning up the content (that still needs confirmation from the Library of Congress once its online catalog is accessible again). הערך עדיין בחיתוליו — I appreciate your pitching in at this formative stage! -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 00:21, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete the hebrew translation, but the script in latin letter "IM - YESH - GAN - EDEN". This information is not relevant to the english speakers who read the article and I afraid it wasn't encyclopedic. I also deleted the translation of the word 'HEAVEN' as 'garden of eden' becouse of the lack of relevance to the english name 'Beaufort'. Danny-w (talk) 11:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot of Beaufort (novel)

[edit]

I've deleted the Plot summary you added to the Beaufort (novel) page. It would be acceptable if edited into encyclopedic language, but certainly not to cut&paste verbatim from a review that's already provided as an external link. The page does need expanding (and I've placed a Template for that). -- Deborahjay (talk) 23:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. Danny-w (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ezra Nawi

[edit]

Hi, I noticed (via Google translate!) that you commented on the Ezra Nawi page that he was convicted of sex with a minor in 1992, and you stated the youth was 17 years old. It is currently being widely reported in Ireland that he was 15, though there are no sources that I can see to support this. If you could provide me with any links in Hebrew that state the age of the Palestinian youth, or can shed any light on this I would be very grateful. Thanks in advance! Cripipper (talk) 00:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I heard it when I talked with friends during a discussion. I don't have written sources. Therefore I didn't write it in the article itself. I'll try to ask this friend about written sources. :-) Danny. Danny-w (talk) 21:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheStranger BookCover3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ISCAR Metalworking, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. XXX8906 (talk) 12:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jamison - anquite mind.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jamison - anquite mind.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM 23:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not visit in the english wikipedia very often. Did not see the note. The eddirors here could change the title to "fair use" like the other places of books covers. I did it in the hebrew wikipedia where I wright more often. Danny-w (talk) 09:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Danny-w. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Duch businesspeople requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Danny-w. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Danny-w. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Danny-w. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Military collector

[edit]

Hello Danny! I am a Swedish militaria collector, and I have been looking for a blank document for the Operation Protective edge ribbon for ages. It will be a display piece, and because of the award being so recent, I dont want any names to be visible on the certificate. I saw that you uploaded a picture of such a document a while back, and I was wondering if I could buy it from you? You decide the price! Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwedishRanger (talkcontribs) 20:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. What picture are you talking about? May I have a link? Danny-w (talk) 12:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Gilad Kahana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never really been referenced since it was created. Two reference present, 1 is an persons own site, the other is his older site. No coverage. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. No social media, nothing of significant on streaming sites. Less than 1600 subscribers on Youtube.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creepTalk 10:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on World Social Work Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ifsw.org/history-world-social-work-day. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t · c) buidhe 15:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to World Social Work Day ‎ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. (t · c) buidhe 16:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I deleted from the article everything that could be suspected of being copied. The text that remains there is original. (Part of it is even taken from the articke "Social Work" in Wikipedia. Currently there is no coppied text there. Danny-w (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you copy text from other wikipedia articles, you must attribute per WP:CWW because Wikipedia's licensing requires attribution.
I'm glad that the infringing text from an external website was deleted, and it's essential not to do that in the future because copyright is taken very seriously on this site for legal reasons. (t · c) buidhe 16:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page World Social Work Day has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.monmouth.edu/school-of-social-work/ifsw/ and https://www.thereisadayforthat.com/holidays/various/world-social-work-day. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review firefly ( t · c ) 16:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The text you deleted was original and not coppied. but as you wish. Danny-w (talk) 16:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]