User talk:CzeCze11

June 2021

Hello, I'm JPxG. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Robert Kasperczyk—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. jp×g 08:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CzeCze11, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CzeCze11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Polish Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stal Rzeszów. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2021–22 in Polish football

Hello, CzeCze11,

Thank you for creating 2021–22 in Polish football.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Update the handbook in the reference to the 2021/22 season version

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 09:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Polish hall names

Article titles in the English Wikipedia go by common name, like it or not. (I often don't like it.) You can't tell me that by some official renaming (or what) the English name suddenly is not the common name anymore. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: yeah, and for Polish stadiums - the common name goes in Polish (i could write it again, "like it or not" :P). Lets go through the Sports venues in Poland category, including the Football venues in Poland one. Some time ago, Wikipedia community recognized the Polish name of the National Stadium (Stadion Narodowy) as a common name, you can find it in the discussion of entries about the above-mentioned the stadium. CzeCze11 (talk) 19:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I admit that I have no idea about sports. The Centennial Hall serves many more purposes, not only sports, so I'd be surprised if that alone is a reason. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ps: For the National Stadium, it looks strange how the lead and infobox don't follow the article title. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was one reason, since I am editing mostly about football in here and made changes by going through sports categories :) but, native names for objects also appear in other languages (e.g. German), although an English translation could be matched - see: Staatsschauspiel Dresden (could be named the State Playhouse Dresden). CzeCze11 (talk) 20:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Staatschauspiel seems to be common, because it's not covered much in English sources, and the home page offers no English name. The Centennial Hall - my guess - is covered in English sources, and wonder how many will use the Polish name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A question next day: Isn't this Polish name the primary Hala Stulecia (Wrocław), therefore Hala Stulecia would be enough? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Well, it can be;) although there is a hala Stulecia in Poland (in Sopot), the one in Wrocław is the most famous. ;) CzeCze11 (talk) 10:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I thought, - you can disambiguate the other then. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:13, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jagiellonia Białystok II for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jagiellonia Białystok II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagiellonia Białystok II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iamfarzan (talk) 04:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021–22 III liga moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021–22 III liga, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hubert Wołąkiewicz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cracovia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pogoń Staszów moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pogoń Staszów, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:19, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including János Esterházy Monument, Warsaw, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pogoń Staszów moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pogoń Staszów, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Polyamorph (talk) 17:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kelechukwu Ebenezer Ibe-Torti

Professional football player at LKS lodz Poland u20 Kelechukwu-torti (talk) 08:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]