User talk:Cybergibbons

Notability of Dogs with wigs

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dogs with wigs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dogs with wigs is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dogs with wigs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 23:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Sherr

Hi Cybergibbons. Sorry, but I've removed your contributions re Jeremy Sherr as they're only supported by blogs which are not usually acceptable as sources. --A bit iffy (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heists has been nominated for discussion

Category:Heists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 13:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Your editing of What3words, specifically in respect of what I assume is your own research work, appears to violate the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest because you appear to have an interest. Please read and act upon wp:COIEDIT and WP:COIADVICE. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Whislt we value your input, as for employees of W3W, it would be best if you could request any changes using the talk page instead of editing the article directly. SmartSE (talk) 10:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine - happy to do that. Cybergibbons (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]