User talk:Cyberdog958/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cyberdog958. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

UCSF project

Hi! I am currently revamping the UCSF project. I created lots of pages and added a lot of content, but there is so much still to do. I saw that you are part of the SFBA task force, so I thought you might be interested and I wanted to invite you to collaborate once more. In particular, we need to add content, do maintenance, and we really would benefit from pictures, so if you are in SF and could help that would be great. Thanks!Eccekevin (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Cyberdog958/Archive 2! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject University of California, San Francisco, an outreach effort which aims to support development of UCSF related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants, check out our To Do list, and join the discussion on our talk page. Thanks!!!

whats your discord

Collapsing obvious sock pleas cyberdog958^Talk 02:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

whats your discord username i need to educate you C3rej (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

@C3rej: I don't respond anywhere except on here and you need to build a consensus before changing the sourced facts. You cannot just say sources are provided just find it in your edit summary while changing quotes of people on the page. The impetus is on you to provide your own sources for the information. cyberdog958^Talk 10:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I know you have social medias young blood. I will happily discuss to you with my sources.

Thank you,

Noah C3rej (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Salutations my cyberdog,

As it wishes to stand, I must happen to know that the user above, c3rej, may or may not be a member within the Sparta Battalion. I would trust him on any source he states, due to his experience within the Battalion. Although he could be bias, I still find the need to hear both sides of the story before dismissing others. Please consider discussing this with him further, and help make Wikipedia a safer and better place, free of unnecessary hate and misinformation.

Thanks, HiandBye2565 HiandBye2565 (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello cyberdog, please do not say this was vandalism. We would like to discuss our sources C3rej (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

I can attest. 216.30.155.14 (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoFaygo

Hi, thanks for taking part in the discussion; but can you please sign your comment as it isn't showing at present, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

@Atlantic306: Yes that’s my bad I can’t believe I didn’t notice yet after all these days. I updated it. Thanks for letting me know. cyberdog958^Talk 01:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renewable assignments has been accepted

Renewable assignments, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

cyberdog958^Talk 11:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Cyberdog958, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Page Curation edit to Hub City Movers

Any specific suggestion regarding what needs verification?

I don't know of any citations that make sense. All of the ones I found are either incorrect, including incorrect quotes from Jimmie, e.g., that we never practiced, or blocked by paywall.

The only one that came close was https://www.google.com/books/edition/Progressive_Country/204WBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Hub+City+Movers%22+-wikipedia&pg=PT13&printsec=frontcover but that mis-attributes Bhagavan to George Vizard.

There's a collection of stuff at https://technologists.com/privatemp3s/HCM/Vulcan%20Gas%20Company%201970/, but I don't see how citing any of that helps. CharlieSauer (talk) 14:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@CharlieSauer: I'm not sure where to find additional sources as I didn't see any obvious ones on first glance. But you reference Discogs a lot which is not a reliable source for info. So anything in the article that is sourced from there isn't verifiable. cyberdog958^Talk 22:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

I added cite to 6/28/70 Statesman article. It is accessible to anyone with a U.S. public library account, I think. CharlieSauer (talk) 00:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Added citation to June 25, 1970 Daily Texas article about the record release. Enough? CharlieSauer (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

added August 2 Statesman reference. Enough? CharlieSauer (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I think of Discogs as a great source of (verifiable) images of record covers, liner notes, media. However, if Wikipedia considers Discogs unreliable, there was no real need for two of the Discogs references, so I removed them. ok to remove the verifcation message? If not, what more is needed? CharlieSauer (talk) 01:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@CharlieSauer: Yes the new sources you added look fine and the info they are providing looks good. Again, WP:DISCOGS is not considered a reliable source and using the YouTube link of the song is not adding any information. I would probably advise to remove the Discogs references and the YouTube references and you can add them in an external links section at the bottom of the page. But it looks a lot better with those additional references. cyberdog958^Talk 01:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

moved YouTubes & Carradine Discogs to Externals. ok now? CharlieSauer (talk) 02:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@CharlieSauer: The body of the article looks good to me. I removed the tag. cyberdog958^Talk 02:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

thanks CharlieSauer (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)