User talk:CuandoCubango

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Elmina Castle. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AngelOfSadness talk 18:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Elmina Castle. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. — Indon (reply) — 19:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 19:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Malacca Sultanate, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Acs4b ^{T C U} 12:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeitgeist the Movie (second nomination)

I came here to speak to you about asuming good faith but I see this is a common problem. Please do not contribute to Wikipedia discussions unless you can do so in good faith. Pdelongchamp (talk) 21:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am here in good faith. Please specify which contribution is bothering you. Thanks, CuandoCubango (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Osama bin Laden appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 16:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quantities of information, Entropy

Hi CuandoCubango,

Please review the [1] edit of a formula you've added on the [2] edit.

Thank you in advance,

Kind regards,

--Olexa Riznyk (talk) 05:45, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skysoft

The article Skysoft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]