User talk:Cuak's

February 2009

You seem to remove a lot of random things from articles without giving any reasoning; please stop. --Golbez (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pakistanis in Spain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. cab (talk) 14:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You *have to give reasons* when removing stuff; simply saying "I know better" doesn't count, because we don't know that you know better. Please see the reliable sources guideline. --Golbez (talk) 15:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 09:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Spanish people. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Ogre (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Spanish people. Thank you. The Ogre (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to White American. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Ogre (talk) 12:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hispanidad. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Ogre (talk) 12:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to European American, you will be blocked from editing. The Ogre (talk) 12:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. The Ogre (talk) 12:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you for a week; not necessarily because I want you to stop editing, but to force you to respond to concerns about your editing. You have repeatedly changed numbers from the sourced data and have not responded to the complaints except once, where you said "I know they're wrong", but that doesn't count - you need to give a source. Hopefully this will cause you to start responding, or at the very least, caring about the concerns; you're still able to edit your talk page. If you have no interest in conforming to our rules about verifiability and reputable sources then the block will become indefinite. --Golbez (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

You should generally refrain from removing other users' comments in the Talk section as you did in Talk:Hispanic and Latino Americans since that is the place for people to discuss particular aspects of the article in question. If you don't agree with the comment, provide a counter- don't just delete theirs. When you do edit, you should provide an edit summary- this may help in preventing your edits from being reverted. The Original Historygeek (talk) 05:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]