User talk:Ctphy

April 2022

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Billy Meier—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I re-uploaded the edits I made. I did not ask if you felt it was constructive. If you would like to experiment in reverting, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Ctphy (talk) 06:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia rules, especially WP:FRINGE, WP:WAR and WP:BRD. Useful essays are WP:LUNATICS and WP:YWAB. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please inform yourself with the rules before putting cult leader, and UFO religion. Ctphy (talk) 06:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Billy Meier shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian (talk) 07:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Meier, you may be blocked from editing. Please see WP:NOT for more info. JimRenge (talk) 07:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]