User talk:Crocodile Punter

Welcome

Hello, Crocodile Punter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair\^talk 11:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Databox Message

Crocodile, thanks very much for the kind words. Great job addressing an important player in the financial services industry. In fact, I am a big fan of databoxes, however, for the reasons indicated below, I don't believe they should be used in the manner you propose.

The databoxes are a terrific way to obtain pertinent data about the subject of the box. This equivalent of an "executive summary" is of tremendous value. However, I believe their use should be limited to the specific subject matter to which they are addressed. If we stray from this logic, then there is no limit to the number of databoxes which would serve as cross references. It is, of course, the ability to cross reference which your usage gives rise to. Nonetheless, taken to its logical conclusion, every article with even the most peripheral or attenuated connection to a company would merit inclusion of the databox. If you and I were to agree to include only those databoxes which we believed were "material" or "substantial" or "significant" or whatever standard we agreed to, what would we do with all those persons who disagreed with our judgement as to what "material" or "substantial", etc.? As, hopefully, I will explain below, the number of companies which could be included in any given article would be enormous and we would be powerless to stop it.

For example, you inserted the Citigroup databox into Sandy Weill's biography, however, why should we stop there? In the course if his career, Sandy Weill absorbed scores of companies many of which already have their own databox, for example, Smith Barney, Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Primerica, and the literally hundreds of other companies that Weill, or the behemoth that Citigoup is, touched. Take a look at the following link: http://www.citigroup.com/citigroup/corporate/history/data/tree85x11.pdf, and you'll get an idea of just how many companies ultimately were in involved in creating today's Citigroup.

If your criteria for including the Citigroup databox was just the subject's last employer, then that could be pretty subjective, or end-up including the databox of a lesser employer. For example, Dan Rather, a very prominent American television news anchor, recently left CBS News and went to HDNet, would we include just HDNet because it's his last employer when CBS is clearly the most important employer the one for which he is best known?

If your criteria was meant to include the subject's "most prominent" employer, what then would we do with a person who was the CEO more than one prominent firm, for example, Louis Gerstner. Lou Gerstner has served as the CEO of both IBM and RJR Nabisco. Each firm is a major worlwide player in their respective field. Would we include both databoxes? If we decided between the two of us that we should include the databox of the firm the subject is "most known for", that could be somewhat subjective and I think the Wiki community would have trouble agreeing on inclusion/exclusion. In any event, it would not resolve the issue if your criteria was to only include those companies still in existence.

With respect to your addition to the Lehman Brothers page, the same logic applies. Think about it, many of the modern corporate worldwide giants, are almost by definition, the amalgamation of hundreds or thousands of companies. It is true that Lehman was once a part of American Express, however, the way companies are bought and sold, should we include the databoxes of each company that was ever part of another? This could make for some pretty complicated and lengthy pages. Think about companies that have been sold several times, like Pershing.

All-in-all, I don't think we could agree to a clear, comprehensive policy for the inclusion or exclusion of databoxes. Nonetheless, your inclusion of the databox has touched on a subject of great intellectual focus for me, that is, the consolidation of the financial services industry in the post WW II era. Sandy Weill, of course, played a tremendous role in this consolidation. I have often thought that Wiki really needed an article on this phenomenon and on that account, would be happy to collaborate with you on such a project. It is a link to this page which I believe most belongs on these pages. As to databoxes, I respectfully disagree with your position. ButtonwoodTree 01:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I may join in, I think the argument against the Databox in, say, Lehman Brothers is very simply expressed. The subject of the article is Lehman Brothers. So long as American Express is wikilinked in the Lehman Brothers article (which it is) then there's no point in repeating the American Express stuff in the Lehman article. To me, it's that simple. - Adrian Pingstone 17:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: CHAPS; Comerica; Cheltenham and Gloucester; ConocoPhillips; Bank Street Grounds; Syndicated loan; Richard McGinn; Cardinal Health; WellPoint; FleetBoston Financial; Cahoot; Bristol and West; Bank of New York; McKesson Corporation; Birmingham Midshires; Frank Popoff; Acquiring bank; HBOS; Texas Instruments

Cleanup: Allstate; Wing Lung Bank; Investment banking
Merge: General Motors Acceptance Corporation; Savings and loan association; Superstore
Add Sources: Loan; Mukesh Ambani; Citigroup Centre
Wikify: Reinsurance; Term life insurance; Weyerhaeuser
Expand: Julian Richer; Verizon Wireless; Marks & Spencer

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Qantas Flags

I like your flag idea. It makes it easier on the reader to know where the airline is from. My compliments... --Golich17 17:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Notability for Indonesia tourist handbook - could you please elaborate - its not clear what your porblem is.... Satu Suro 14:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary comment needs to find its way onto the talk page or my talk page seeing i did the article mainly. I notice youve done nothing about the Moon article - they are the two largest used guide books by travellers in Indonesia in the last thirty years for a start - they create and have created ' the cognitive landsccape' for probably about the equivalent of 1 million travelers at least in that time - and there are implications for travel behaviour and both indonesian cultural and economic conditions, as well as a number of other trickle effects. I await with interest your response.... Satu Suro 14:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really notable? It's the only Lonely Planet guide to have a page in wikipedia... is there a reason this book is so much more notable than other lonely planet guidebooks?

As a member of the Indonesia Project I have spent some time dealing with about 1,000 + stubs regarding geographical features of the Indonesian archipelago - and the serious problems of WP V and WP N - the creation of the article about the guide book is that one of the many threads in my 10,000 + edit stage of my editing on wikipedia is to verify against the moon handbook and the lonely planet books the correct naming of Indonesian locations (dont let me even starrt a rave about volcanoes of indonesia) as well as some other sources (notably NEVER the cia fact book for a start) - and the presence of the lonely planet guide is an intrinsic part of that project. I would hope you see the reasoning - that there may well be eventually some 1,000 stubs and articles that sit will at 'what links here' if you understand the project and i get the opportunity - god willing... :) Satu Suro 14:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It will be notable in that it has lists of places, and things about indonesia that will make the article move well beyond a stub. I can assure you of that - as well as some of the critiques from academic works about guide books (which are not in any in wikipedia article) at the moment - I have trawled through some of the crappiest articles i have ever seen on tourism in wikipedia the standard is abysmal... :) Satu Suro 14:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please note - the focus is on Indonesia - not lonely planet or the other rubbish out in the market that call themselves guide books - it is specifically this title, for the reasons I have given. If you dont understand - I have more or less single handedly created the Western Tasmania articles for wikipedia (with help of ccourse) and the Charles Whitham book is intrinsic with that particular project - as it is the most comprehensive source for information prior to Geoffrey Blaineys Peaks of Lyell - and that works as insurance for over 50 articles for V and N - and rather than only cite it all the time - it is also linked- as some people might find frequent refs to it and want to find out more a about it for reference purposes. If you could only understand the particular title is what I am focused on I couldnt give a dam about the wheelers empire or their competitiors it is a template ref - and I wish to keep to it and if you find the need to take issue over whch I am not interested (all the rest of the rubbish that call themselves guide books) I will need to ask for third or four persons to verify the need for this ref - I suggest time could be better spent cleaning up the tourism articles than worrying about this one title. Also I would appreciate it if you did. Satu Suro 10:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a die-hard inclusionist, who almost always says "keep" in AfD discussions, but the prospect of thousands of articles on every book published by Lonely Planet, Rough Guides, Frommers, Fodors, Let's Go, or Footprint, each with just the authors and table of contents, is mind-boggling. I would be dead set against that myself and would join in any afd if any body tried that - just go to Charles Whitham and Peaks of Lyell and see what links here - and how the issue that I have dealt with in the Westernn Tasmania project has been done - I also did my post grad fieldwork in Yogyakarta in Indonesia and had collected a vast amount of information about how the central javanese tourism authorities collected data- as well as how the guide books and maps from overseas publishers were frequently wrong with their information. - as a consequence could give you the equivalent of a ma thesis on th tourism guide books for central java and yogyakarta for the last 70 years - and the implications for the tourist industry in the region from the top of my head - but that is not really necessary I hope...

I consider that a particular guide book that is being used in the way that Ihave proposed particular way does not create a precedent for every publication in every publishers stable to have an article at all!!!Satu Suro

My apologies if I have broached the barrier with civility, i do get carried away at times over issues of certain articles - sorry about that.Satu Suro 10:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with the indonesian tourism research was that i never published - however as I slowly unpack a moved house storage set of cardboard boxes - I will very slowly add material... Satu Suro 10:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - I consider some of the tourism articles on wikipedia at the lowest commondenominator (just like the lead articles on maritime history in wikipedia ( I started WP:WikiProject Australian Maritime History ) ) - and I would rather very slowly (later this year) work on either helping to improve the tourism articles - they are almost substandard in my perception - compared to the quality of current academic studies of tourism - but I have three major projects to work through first - which will take at least six months at current times i have onSatu Suro 10:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Days later - I feel even less sure that my particular line might not be the most suitable - a fellow indonesia project friends suggested that I put maybe the main two - Indo Handbook, Loneley/s, and any others to mention - in a cpmbined single article - my sincerest apologies to take up taken up your talk page space -and I may well make a combined article after all - but involved with too many weird threads at the moment.... Satu Suro 09:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Rwandan Genocide as this week's WP:ACID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Rwandan Genocide was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 23:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in Articles

Please do not add flags without discussion/consensus. We've had flags in many pages before, but we have decided that they are gaudy and not many people know which flag belongs to which country, therefore we have decided not to use them. Thanks.--Golich17 02:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging AAdvantage

Every single part of information in the AAdvantage articles was moved to the new section in the American Airlines page. It has been a habit of many people to now merge such articles into the actual page just to avoid confusion and to make life simpler. Instead of a traditional link to the page, now it's right in the page. AAdvantage is only American Airlines' frequent flyer program which gives me even more reason to execute the merge.--Golich17 16:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strategic management

You've made a recent contribution to the article on strategic management, and I've made a proposal to revert that article to a prior version that existed before vandalism in July 2006. Please see Talk: Strategic management#Once_a_great_article. Please add your comments to that talk page if you're concerned about this. Thank you. --SueHay 04:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your input at Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive

Since you are a member of WikiProject Economics, I would like to direct your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive. We are currently deciding on an economics-related article to bring to Featured Article status and we would like your input. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 15:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Visa Black Card Content

I noticed that you reposted that the information about Visa Black Card was not-notable and added a "written like an advertisement" warning to the top of the article. The information provided is fact about what the card offers. Can you tell me how to eliminate such a warning? It is our hopes to simply have the details about the card available, and after reviewing content on similar credit cards, it does not seem as though Visa Black Card is more promotional than others. Thanks Knowingis (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Knowingis[reply]

I apologize for the wording on the concerning part- "It is our hopes to simply have the details about the card available", as I do not work for Visa nor Visa Black Card. The content was not meant to promote the brand. Thank you for the input regarding notability and for removing the advertisement flag. Knowingis (talk) 20:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Knowingis[reply]

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

PIGS Article

As you are a editor, please chech out and possibly edit/fix this. If you read it you will see there are numerous problems (including the name which could arguably be PIIGS). Thank you. Joedavis12345 (talk) 06:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World Factoring Yearbook

I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry (Message me) 14:47, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Brands

Hello, Crocodile Punter. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of companies in the Chicago metropolitan area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenview, Illinois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claire's

Hi! I found these edits.

I did research into the subject a few years ago. I just checked the website and the situation hasn't changed. The company has two offices, with one in Pembroke Pines and one in Hoffman Estates. The CEO resides in Florida, and a newspaper in South Florida said "[...]which may include shedding Claire's Pembroke Pines headquarters and workers." -- another newspaper wrote in 1997 that "Since 1973, Schaefer has been commuting from his offices in Pembroke Pines, Fla., to the company's main facility and distribution center, first located in Wood Dale and now in Hoffman Estates. (The company also has offices in New York and Hong Kong.)" -- that is why I wrote that the Florida office is the HQ. If you know of sources saying that the CEO and headquarters shifted to Illinois or that the Florida facility is closing, that would be welcome. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... so the Florida papers say it's based in Florida while the Chicago papers say it's based in Chicago. The website just lists both offices and divides them by function. Do you think we should contact the companies WikiProject? In its IR page it lists "Headquarters" and then its Florida office first, followed by the Illinois office. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are other sources that say it's based in Florida, such as:

John Dobosz. "Claire's Stores: Cheap 'Tween Retailer." Forbes. 1/26/2005. "Joseph McKittrick Joseph McKittrick of Investment Quality Trends recommends buying shares of Claire’s Stores , The Pembroke Pines, Fla.-based specialty retailer of fashion[...]" (National)
Lunceford, Darcie. "Moody's downgrades Claire's citing weak performance." South Florida Business Journal. January 12, 2009. "It probably wasn’t the Christmas gift Pembroke Pines-based Claire’s Stores was hoping for." (Florida)

WhisperToMe (talk) 05:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm going to do for now is to not declare either office a "headquarters" - Just say the company has two offices (both should be covered from the section anyway). I found one about Claire's moving from Dade County to Pembroke Pines and I would very much like to use this source in the article. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:11, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this will do the trick: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Companies#Which_office_is_the_primary_headquarters_of_Claire.27s.3F - Hope I get something good :) WhisperToMe (talk) 05:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On their most recent SEC forms the company identifies Hoffman Estates as where the "principal executive offices" are located. Do you think this is definitive? WhisperToMe (talk) 05:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This 2007 listing for "Claire's Stores" lists Pembroke Pines: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/34115/000095014407005510/g07806sv8pos.htm - I'll see if/when they changed it to Hoffman for "Claire's Stores" WhisperToMe (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After going through some SEC filings, in Talk:Claire's I documented that originally "Claire's Stores, Inc." listed Pembroke Pines as its "principal executive offices" until at least 2008. It became a subsidiary to "Claire's, Inc." and, while I haven't yet located old SEC filings of "Claire's, Inc." - 2013 filings of "Claire's, Inc." and "Claire's Stores, Inc." list Hoffman Estates as the "principal executive offices". WhisperToMe (talk) 06:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored a lot of the information removed in this edit. Now, the current office list is kept, but past office locations in New York and Hong Kong should be noted and physical descriptions of the current headquarters should remain. Now, it's true that things may change from 1996 to 2014. That doesn't mean information valid in 1996 should be removed. It means you add statements saying "As of 1996, the building had terrazzo floors that so-and-so said "reflect the character of the company"" or something similar. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amex Locations.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amex Locations.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Membership Rewards) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Membership Rewards, Crocodile Punter!

Wikipedia editor Pipetricker just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Marked Membership Rewards as reviewed.

Learn more about page curation.

(end of the message generated by Special:NewPagesFeed)

It's just a redirect, so no big deal. This was mainly to try out the message function of Special:NewPagesFeed. Cheers! --Pipetricker 21:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Crocodile Punter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Crocodile Punter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help with article?

Hi,

I noticed you're a member of the Wikipedia Private Equity Task Force. I wonder if you'd be willing to help me out by reviewing Draft: Fifth Wall Ventures for publication. It's a VC-firm focused on real estate with about $200m under management.

Although I am an experienced Wikipedia editor and always try to abide by the five pillars, in this case I have a conflict of interest (disclosed on the Talk page), so Wikipedia policy requires that all my work be reviewed by an independent editor before it's published. I'd be glad to do any additional work you think the article requires.

Thanks for considering this!

Ed

BC1278 (talk) 21:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Crocodile Punter! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Crocodile Punter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Crocodile Punter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Membership Rewards

The article Membership Rewards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a bank's Membership Rewards web-host

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eatcha (talk) 18:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Articore (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sirdog were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only solid source showing notability here in my view is AFR. Other sources are either non-independent or are routine announcements I would expect of any decently sized corporation. We need more sources to establish notability. While I also marked this as reading like an advertisement, it's really just 2 items causing me to feel like that. The first is "FY23 Articole had...", not all readers are going to known what "FY23" means and is it entirely necessary to list off all of those statistics in the lead? The second is Articore Group emerged from a corporate restructuring..." (emphasis mine). "Emerged" gives off a positive connotation in favor of the company. A more neutral wording may be "In October 2023, Articore Group underwent a corporate restructuring..".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Articore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Sirdog (talk) 06:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crocodile Punter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Sirdog (talk) 06:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Articore

Hello, Crocodile Punter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Articore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]