User talk:Craig Michaud
A barnstar for you
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | ||
For all of the excellent work you have already done adding images to Wikipedia in your as-yet brief time here, I award you this Photographer's Barnstar. Wear it with pride; you are a fine example to others. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 15:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
Seriously excellent work. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 15:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Travis snider.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Travis snider.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictures of roller coasters
[edit]Could you upload you files of roller coasters directly in Wikipedia Commons ? In other country , we use photos of American roller coaster and when they are on English Wikipedia , we must realise a transfert . Thank you . ( I am JÄNNICK Jérémy and I work for the French portal of Amusement Parks http://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Portail:Parcs_d%27attractions ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.205.125.89 (talk) 16:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:CraigMichaud.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:CraigMichaud.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 05:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Craigmichaud1.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Craigmichaud1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 05:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Airforceonemanchesternh.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airforceonemanchesternh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:Alanshephardgrave.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:39, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Barybauerconcord.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
The file File:Braddelptribute.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused image, no freedom of panorama for 3D artwork in the US
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)