User talk:Conrailman4122

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please stop re-adding the claim of 20 additional Chargers. The citation is for the 20 (of now 22) units in the original order, not an additional 20. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Richard H. Anderson (businessman) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Richard H. Anderson (businessman) was changed by Conrailman4122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903057 on 2018-10-04T14:39:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 21:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. oknazevad (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 10:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I made the block longer than I would have due to your personal attack here. 331dot (talk) 10:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock Puppetry as User: 67.87.196.115 .

You need to stop making edits as User: 67.87.196.115 . Your edits are considered to be sock puppetry, and will lead to you being blocked (again) from editing. A longer ban, possibly indefinite, could result. Morphenniel (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Conrailman4122: Since you don't seem to get the message, I have added more information to your existing investigation [1].

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continued edit warring and personal attacks despite a previous block for the same behaviour. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the socking concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Conrailman4122 are separate from the block for personal attacks and edit warring above. If reviewing admins/clerks find the evidence of extensive socking to be persuasive, I expect the block will be amended to an indefinite duration.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption, personal attack and block evasion. I was going to reblock for two weeks due to your block evasion, however this ridiculous screed from an IP you admit to being yours makes it apparent that you are not capable of editing Wikipedia in the mature and collegial manner expected.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]