User talk:Comosport7
Welcome Comosport7!
I'm Anoptimistix, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Sincerely, Anoptimistix (talk) 10:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Comosport7, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Damian Dark, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Damian Dark has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No references. No evidence of notability. Does not even clarify that this is a fictional character.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Legends of Tomorrow. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Arrow episodes, you may be blocked from editing. DonQuixote (talk) 15:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Arrow episodes. DonQuixote (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Damien Darhk Wikipedia listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Damien Darhk Wikipedia. Since you had some involvement with the Damien Darhk Wikipedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Adam9007 (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Vegas Golden Knights
[edit]Thank you for you contributions to the Vegas Golden Knights. However, there is already an article on the 2017 NHL Expansion Draft as well as details in the 2017–18 Vegas Golden Knights season on the subject you are adding to the page. For an example of how other expansion teams have shown their details on the expansion drafts, read Minnesota Wild, Columbus Blue Jackets, etc. to see why I have removed your list. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 17:44, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]Hello. Please do not ignore warnings on Wikipedia. When there is a big warning that clearly says "NO FUTURE RANKINGS HERE. NEVER POST RANKINGS AHEAD OF TIME, ALWAYS WAIT FOR THE OFFICIAL WTA RANKING UPDATE", just do not ignore it. It is rude, it is wrong, it is disruptive. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Please use accurate edit summaries instead of "Added more."
[edit] Hello. Many of your edits have an edit summary that are inaccurate and misleading. "Added more." is not an accurate edit summary when you just change something (and the changes are often questionable or even wrong) without actually adding anything. Edit summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 17:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello again. I am replying to your question on my talk page. As far as I understand, WP:ES (BTW, the page contains everything you need to know about edit summaries) says that edit summary is "good practice", not something that is strictly required for every single edit. For example, when you are making a minor edit to a section or reverting vandalism, I think the default prefilled summaries (like the section name or "Undid edits by XYZ...") are OK. You don't have to explain every single detail. The edit summary just should not be empty, and it should not be inaccurate either. And I don't think you don't now how to do an edit summary. In fact, you were making good edit summaries when you were posting the questions on my talk page. :-) See [1] and [2]. It's just a question of putting something meaningful into the "Edit summary" text box. For example, when you are changing the ranking, the edit summary can be something like "Ranking update". When you fix a typo, it can be a "Typo fix" etc. It's quite simple, actually. :-) —J. M. (talk) 21:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]Unspecified source/license for File:Ben Lively pitching for the Phillies on Father's Day.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Ben Lively pitching for the Phillies on Father's Day.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Ben Lively pitching for the Phillies on Father's Day.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 23:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Joe Manganiello.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Was the note about not adding films not in production unclear? DonIago (talk) 04:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Tomislav Draganja
[edit]Hi. I suppose the page is now fixed thanks to Ytfc23 (I think it was the redundant linebreaks and the broken table). If there is something I'm missing, let me know. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 12:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Comosport7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Comosport7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Comosport7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)