User talk:CityLimitsJunction

This user has created 29 articles on Wikipedia.

Mill Plain, Danbury, Connecticut moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mill Plain, Danbury, Connecticut, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 17:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MB: Thank you for writing. I have made improvements to Draft:Mill Plain, Danbury, Connecticut and added many new sources. At this point, would it be possible to move the article back to the mainspace? If not, would you be willing to provide feedback on citations/areas in need of revision? Any help on this will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. CLJ (talk). 22:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Kenosia

I added Lake Kenosia to WP:US50. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lake Kenosia, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not revert my latest edit. Please read my edit summary and respond on the talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mill Plain, Danbury, Connecticut has been accepted

Mill Plain, Danbury, Connecticut, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CityLimitsJunction

Thank you for creating Miry Brook, Connecticut.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:33, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aqua Vista for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aqua Vista is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua Vista until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 03:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Long Ridge, Danbury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Long Ridge, Danbury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Ridge, Danbury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 02:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Candlewood Corner

Hello, CityLimitsJunction,

Thank you for creating Candlewood Corner.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please consider adding references to show that the subject is notable

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 18:32, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wooster Square, Danbury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wooster Square, Danbury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooster Square, Danbury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 17:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CityLimitsJunction. Thank you for your work on Cathy Ang. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CityLimitsJunction. Thank you for your work on Birdon, Florida. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article! I encourage you to create more articles! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, CityLimitsJunction. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Heather Gay, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You have uploaded File:Heather Gay.jpg, a close-up portrait of the subject, which you have claimed as your own work. If this attribution is accurate, it is highly suggestive of some level of connection to the subject. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Yes, I am very familiar with the COI guideline and understand how this development could be mistaken for a violation of said guideline. However, other than a brief encounter, from which I did capture the photo you mention, I have no connection to the subject. I chose to develop the article as a means to support a deserving woman with an important message, as is pertains to the Mormon community. Other than admiration of a public figure, I personally gain absolutely nothing from my contributions to this article. CityLimitsJunction (talk) 15:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All good, thank you for the prompt response. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:40, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heather Gay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heather Gay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Gay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your "deletionist" approach does not impact articles that actually have merit. CityLimitsJunction (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CityLimitsJunction. Thank you for your work on Castlelough. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've moved this to the list of castles where mentioned

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CityLimitsJunction. Thank you for your work on Milltown, New York. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CityLimitsJunction. Thank you for your work on Gowanus Houses. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Rick’s Place" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rick’s Place has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 20 § Rick’s Place until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 21:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Hochstein moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lisa Hochstein. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and Refs are clickbait, interview and social media.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 21:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please identify which sources are categorized as "clickbait" or originate from social media? And to say that this article "has no sources" is an assertion that lacks any basis. The Miami Herald and New York Times are unquestionably regarded as credible sources.

While I can recognize that some of the sources used in this article may not be of the highest journalistic standards, this is commonplace within the domain of television personalities like the one under discussion. To illustrate, you can refer to other individuals in similar roles, such as Jacqueline Laurita, Dina Cantin, Carlton Gebbia Gizelle Bryant, Ashley Darby, etc. You'll notice that these pages cite numerous sources that are considerably less reputable compared to the ones utilized in this article. With that said, moving the page to draftspace is not an appropriate measure, as it is on par, if not more qualified, compared to that of its peers. The move appears to be an unjustified exercise of authority, as the reasons cited for the move are completely unfounded. The most suitable course of action at this point would be to re-publish the page. CityLimitsJunction (talk) 22:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Sunset Ranch, New Mexico" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sunset Ranch, New Mexico has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 14 § Sunset Ranch, New Mexico until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Google Maps recognizes Sunset Ranch as a locale, with defined borders, within the Albuquerque, New Mexico boundary.

"Sunset Ranch, Albuquerque, NM 87121" (Map). Google Maps.

Until the area is further established & developed, it should remain as is, a redirect. CityLimitsJunction (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Hochstein has been accepted

Lisa Hochstein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

zoglophie^•talk• 20:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LesserEvil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LesserEvil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LesserEvil (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Situation Group (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Situation Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend a ^💬 03:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Clearfrienda, I'm not sure how you came to this conclusion, as the articles cited are either centered completely around the subject or majorly focused on the founder/company. The articles that have been sourced are in-depth, reliable, secondary, and 100% independent of the subject. I encourage a second look because this article meets all of the criteria. CityLimitsJunction (talk) 03:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See User talk:Clearfrienda#Situation Group. Clear friend a ^💬 21:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CityLimitsJunction! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clear friend a ^💬 03:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Dingle Ridge, New York" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dingle Ridge, New York has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 4 § Dingle Ridge, New York until a consensus is reached. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]