User talk:Ciringacenjunga
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Ciringacenjunga, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 23:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Reverting without explaining in Arabic
[edit]Your latest revert in Arabic was not explained. Per WP:REVEXP, you have to explain why you reverted that edit. I dont see anything wrong with it.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- @SharabSalam: I apologize as I should have left an explanation. "Most eloquent" is a reasonable translation, but it doesn't really get at what الفصحى means. Lane's Arabic-English Lexicon says that the original meaning of فصيح is "divested of the froth" or "clear of its biestings" in reference to milk. From this meaning, Lane says, is derived "chaste" or "free from barbarousness [لحن]" or "pure." Lane notes that it can sometimes mean "eloquent"; but this is appears to be a further derived meaning resulting from the perceived eloquence of the chaste or pure Arabic.
- The central idea of the term الفصحى must be understood in the historical context of the sudden and rapid corruption of the Arabic language due to the sharp increase in intercourse between Arabs and non-Arabs from the time of Mohammed, from which time "it became a matter of the highest importance to the Arabs to preserve the knowledge of that speech which had thus become obsolescent, and to draw a distinct line between the classical and post-classical languages. ... Hence the vast collection of lexicons and lexicological works composed by Arabs, and by Muslims naturalized among the Arabs; which compositions, but for the rapid corruption of the language, would never have been undertaken."
- Really, I think the best translation is "most chaste" rather than "purest" because the former implies the latter with the added meaning of undefiledness. The perceived eloquence of الفصحى is a consequence of its chasteness. -Ciringacenjunga (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Ciringacenjunga, not sure about that. I dont think that Fusha is the "purest" Arabic. It is the most understandable Arabic. Two weeks ago you changed eloquence to purest. I speak Arabic but I dont know what is the best English translation of the word Fusha. IMO, the word Fusha would mean "Standard Arabic" or "literary Arabic". In any case we dont want to do original research, we should only say what reliable sources are saying. I found this source [1] which says that Fusha means "literary Arabic".--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 14:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)