Jump to content

User talk:GK at CRG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:CRG Int'l)
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Gregory G. Curtin, Ph.D., JD

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gregory G. Curtin, Ph.D., JD, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://futureofgov.com/about-2/meet-gregory-curtin/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @CRG Int'l: Hello! Unfortunately, because we can't independently verify that permission has been given, that material as it stands now is still a copyright violation. Because of the license Wikipedia publishes under, we need some more things done before before we can accept this text. Since Wikipedia releases its content under This Free License (which allows anyone anywhere to use, re-use, modify, parody, sell for a profit, or basically any purpose whatsoever), we must ensure that source material is similarly licensed. While the owners may permit this content to be used here, I imagine they don't want it changed, sold, or any of the other possibilities that our free license allows.
  • So in order to use this text on Wikipedia, the source web page must release its content under the same license (which allows all those same uses I mentioned), or they can release just this text under that license (again with the same understanding of how it may be used by anyone). For instructions on how to do that, see This Link. That will entail some emailing to prove the owners of that text are in fact authorizing its release, and confirming they understand what that entails.
  • In the meantime, the copyrighted text will probably have to be deleted, but can easily be re-added once permission is processed. Thanks for your contributions, CrowCaw 23:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gregory G. Curtin, Ph.D., JD

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gregory G. Curtin, Ph.D., JD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://futureofgov.com/about-2/meet-gregory-curtin/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 01:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I'm sorry, but the text you imported is copyright and cannot be brought into Wikipedia. This is because Wikipedia is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and the GFDL for free reuse by anyone anywhere (including modification and commercial use), and copyright text is not compatible with this licence. Text that is licensed under these may normally be imported, but by licensing, the owner loses control of where the text may appear. Please see WP:COPYVIO. Licensing of the text may be done, but this must be done by the means given in that policy. We cannot accept an unverifiable claim on a talk page. I'm sure you can understand why we are rather keen on preventing any possible abuse. I would not advise licensing the text, as the wording is rather promotional in appearance in places ("is especially skilled at managing" for example), and this is not compatible with our neutral style. I would suggest reading WP:BIO and WP:RS and doing a rewrite (in a neutral encyclopaedic way, and steering well clear of the blog wording) in your user space. I can't provide a link for you to use, but this can be explained later. Peridon (talk) 12:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CRG Int'l

[edit]

Dear Peridon. Thank you for your thorough explanation and the advice. We were going to donate the text from the website under "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License by emailing to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as instructed on Wikipedia Declaration of Consent page (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries). But, since you think the text of the article has a promotional "flavor" and is not neutral and you are advising re-writing an entirely new encyclopedic article we will take your advice. Question: "Since our User Name "CRG Int'l" has been blocked indefinitely, should we create another user profile/name for submitting a new article? do you have any other links or advises before we start? many thanks. 

CRG Int'l (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Click on History at the top of the page, and then click on the date of my last edit in the list. Copy the 'spamun' template (it's one of the two white bits in the blocking notice - the other is 'unblock'), then come back to here and paste it. Oh, before you do this, chose a name not connected to the organisation (although something like 'Fred at CRG' is acceptable under the policy). Doesn't have to be a real life personal name, but don't chose something like 'Barack Obama'... When you've pasted and filled in, click Preview. You can then use the 'check availability' thing. When everything's OK, click save. Someone will review the request, and when you get a pale green box, go to WP:CHU and scroll down to Simple. All this is a lot less complicated than it looks, by the way. The change is very quick nowadays, too. When you make your new draft, put it at User:newname/DRAFT. Obviously, put your new name in there, then click and save. This gives you a subpage to work on with less hassle than going into article space. When it's sort of ready, ask for advice and opinion. We'll either launch it for you or, if you're autoconfirmed by then, tell you how to do it. Peridon (talk) 10:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CRG Int'l

[edit]

dear Peridon, thank you. following your instructions.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

GK at CRG (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. PhilKnight (talk) 10:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CRG Int'l

[edit]

Dear PhilKnight thank you very much for accepting the request for name change. i have followed the instructions and and put in the request. CRG Int'l (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== CRG Int'l == Legobot posted this message in response to my request for name change: "The request was made by CRG Int'l, not CRG Int'l; please login as CRG Int'l to request a name change" I was logged in as CRG Int'l when I made the request. So I logged out and logged in again and made teh request again. Legobot came back with the same response again: "The request was made by CRG Int'l, not CRG Int'l; please login as CRG Int'l to request a name change". I am not sure what I am doing wrong. Cpuld you please help or explain where i am making a mistake if i have actually made one. Thank you!CRG Int'l (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've answered this at my talk page. Have a look. Peridon (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory G. Curtin, Ph.D., JD (February 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

GK at CRG

[edit]

Thank you very much for the thorough explanation of the reasons for decline at this time. And thank you for offer to help and links to resources. I rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. I assume there not limit on writing time - as I will take every effort to make the article a good fit for Wikipedia.

GK at CRG (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

-- Sam Sing! 04:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! GK at CRG, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam Sing! 04:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GK at CRG

[edit]

Dear Sam Sailor. Thank you very much for the though explanation of the reasons for decline at this time. And thank you for offer to help and links to resources. I rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Per your advice I post a question at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Articles for creation help desk. I assume there not limit on writing time - as I will take every effort to make the article a good fit for Wikipedia.

GK at CRG (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good idea to leave a talkback message when the conversation is taking place with big gaps in it. To do this, put {{tb}} at the bottom of the other user's talk page. This page seems to be on my watchlist, which is why I saw it. It may not be on Sam's. Peridon (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory G. Curtin, Ph.D., JD (May 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CookieMonster755 (talk) 03:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gregory G. Curtin has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gregory G. Curtin. Thanks! Onel5969 TT me 13:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gregory G. Curtin concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gregory G. Curtin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gregory G. Curtin

[edit]

Hello, GK at CRG. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gregory G. Curtin".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GK_at_CRG&oldid=1143013633"