User talk:Bunnyhop11

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bunnyhop11! I am Brewcrewer and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! brew crewer (yada, yada) 00:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Gator Bowl

Thanks for the spelling ~~korecshun~~ correction! JKBrooks85 (talk) 05:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that

you have been popping up on a lot of my book marked (watch) pages. If you post something, anything, on your user page then your name will appear in blue instead of red and you will find, maybe, that you and your posting are viewed in a less suspicious light. Feel free to ask what I am talking about if you don't get it. Life is supposed to be interesting. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 17:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Carptrash (talk) 23:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Docherty

I notice you've been adding some tags to this page. When looking at it myself I've noticed that the entire page contents were changed from a notable football player to an unnotable engineer a couple of weeks ago (which no one had previously picked up on) so I've reverted it back to that page. Hope you're OK with this. Dpmuk (talk) 12:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore that - just noticed that you just did that before I got a chance! Dpmuk (talk) 12:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation of ADS in stellar designations

Recently, you have disambiguated a number of wikilinks in stellar designations starting with ADS to point to the Astrophysics Data System. Unfortunately, this is incorrect. The Astrophysics Data System is a literature database and does not contain a star catalogue. These ADS designators refer to the Aitken Double Star Catalogue. In order to determine the meaning of acronyms in designations, you may find it useful to refer to the Dictionary of Nomenclature of Celestial Objects [1], an online database of acronyms appearing in astronomical designations. Also, many of the lists of alternate designations have been taken from SIMBAD, a database of astronomical objects. For example, if you search for the star HD 8801 in SIMBAD [2], a list of designations similar to that currently in our article will appear in the "Identifiers" section. Clicking on each designation will reveal which catalog it refers to. I hope this information is useful to you.

Spacepotato (talk) 18:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AKA

I know it looks like a disambig page, but it's not. Read the first paragraph. - Denimadept (talk) 17:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Persepolis F.C. invite

Please accept this invitation to join the Persepolis F.C. WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Persepolis FC. Simply click here to accept!

Please use edit summaries, minor edit flag

Hello! When making a change, please provide an edit summary. This helps other editors understand your change and keeps Wikipedia running smoothly. I notice that many of your changes are fixing spellings or disambiguating; your summary can be just "spelling" or "dab". Also please note the minor edit checkbox underneath the edit summary; if your change is minor, such as fixing spelling or links, it also helps other editors to mark the edit as minor. Thanks. --Uncia (talk) 19:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You made some changes in articles I have on watchlist recently. Your changes were in the nature of spelling changes that are much appreciated. Per the note vrom Uncia, it would be helpful if you included an edit summary (something as simple as "spelling"); that way, when someone has the article on their watchlist they can see right away that it's ok and they don't have to pull up the changes to review in detail. Cbl62 (talk) 16:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add to the chorus here. You're still not including edit summaries. Please get in the habit of doing so. It requires little effort and it's very helpful to other editors. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Hello bunnyhop11 (talk · contribs), I am the creater of the Stones (rapper) article and I just stopeed by to thank you for the edits you made to help improve the article. I'm fairly new to the site and that is my first post so I'm trying to bring it up to code and I would like it if you stopped by more often to help me do so. Have a wonderful day, peace (HipHopDoc (talk) 16:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Bunnyhop fan

Good work on correcting the spelling of San Francisco across all Wikipedia articles, I like the idea that someone like Bunnyhop11 is hopping around the world doing that, great idea! SeventhHell (talk) 23:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for correcting the spelling on Robert Browning.—Tetracube (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ardijah

Do you have a piicture about it: Ardijah ???--Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:28, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September Hase

Thanks for fixing the years active in the September Hase infobox! Not sure how I missed that before... It helps a lot! Iheartrockers85 (talk) 18:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for catching my bonehead spelling (Colombia, not Columbia) in the George Maney article. Spacini (talk) 18:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Southern Nazarene University

Template:Southern Nazarene University has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Aepoutre (talk) 16:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bunnyhop11! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Edward Woodall - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment

Please comment here. MisterE2123Five3 (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.

Due to your past contribution to Technological utopianism, you may currently want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

I feel Loremaster is editing Singularitarianism and Technological utopianism in a biased manner in accordance with his Save The Earth propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards Neo-Luddism. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion:

Loremaster says he is:

"...critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms."

Loremaster wants people to:

"...stop indulging in techno-utopian fantasies... ...so that we can all focus on energies on saving the planet."

Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states:

"Although I am convinced that the world is in fact heading toward an ecological catastrophe, I think it can be averted and my optimism makes me want to fight to do do just that."

81.151.135.248 (talk) 12:26, 18 December 2010 (UTC)JB[reply]

LOL
Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a technorealist who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the Technological utopianism or Singularitarianism articles. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding the former article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book Citizen Cyborg).
I find it disgusting that 81.151.135.248 would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.
In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia.

--Loremaster (talk) 01:00, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

National Register of Historic Places listings in Grand Traverse County, Michigan

The two properties you removed from National Register of Historic Places listings in Grand Traverse County, Michigan (Dougherty Mission House and Stickney Summer House-Bowers Harbor Inn) were both added to the National Register of Historic Places on April 8, 2011 (here's the weekly list from the National Park Service verifying same). I presume the resource you were using to cross-check the information was not up-to-date. You might be using the State of Michigan's Historic Sites Online; if you are, be aware that the information on that site has not (as far as I can tell) been updated since about 2005. Andrew Jameson (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you're right! Bunnyhop11 (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Thanks for your correction! Bullmoosebell (talk) 22:47, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Thank you for the text improvements you made to the original work that I posted on Construction Management. I'm a degreed professional Construction Manager and providing accurate information as an expert in my field of practice is very imprtant to me.

Thank you very much for your contribution.

Best regards,

Joe D. Skeith

Construction Manager (571) 237-8534 mobile (703) 940-9140 fax jskeith@cmprofessionals.net www.cmprofessionals.net

Jskeith (talk) 18:15, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fish sources

Do you have sources for your changes to family in the fish species? It goes against the IUCN source, example here. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 13:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am basing it on, for example, gbif.org and fishbase.org, and on the Wikipedia article that Belontiidae redirects to, which is really the article for the family Osphronemidae, and says that Belontiidae was recently demoted to a subfamily of Osphronemidae. Hope that helps. Bunnyhop11 (talk) 13:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting a 404 on one of those links, but if you are changing can you add a source as you do it? Otherwise the information on the page conflicts with the one source it has. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I have done that. Bunnyhop11 (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) Chipmunkdavis (talk) 17:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Logo removed from Pfam

Hi,

It wasn't clear to me why you removed the logo picture on the Pfam article in your recent edit. The file looks fine to me. Thanks. Alexbateman (talk) 10:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was an error on my part (long story). I've fixed it. Bunnyhop11 (talk) 10:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Alexbateman (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"AH2"

It's a generic electron acceptor ("A" for acceptor, "H2" representing the reducing capacity of hydrogen). I put a hatnote on the AH2 page pointing to electron acceptor. The loose "A" is the component of "AH2" that remains after the H2 is oxidized away. DMacks (talk) 13:47, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

so, does it make sense to make all the AH2's link to electron acceptor? I will change them if that's a good idea. Bunnyhop11 (talk) 13:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable to me. Here's the one I did (was on my watchlist so I did it before seeing you had found a bunch more). I tried to make it more explanatory for lay-readers rather than just linking the symbol. DMacks (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact me

Hi there - I am the Director, Community Advocacy for the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that supports Wikipedia. It's very important that I talk to you - would you please email me at philippewikimedia.org at your earliest opportunity? Again, it's very important and urgent that I speak with you. Thank you. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 06:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1906 (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1906 (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1906 (film) (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Integrity (software), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SQL Server (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Guanín (bronze)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Guanín (bronze) —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Anomalocaris (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bunnyhop11. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Path loss

An article that you have been involved in editing—Path loss—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edward Woodall

The article Edward Woodall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 02:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Kraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sorbonne. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]