User talk:Brichcja

Older things: User talk:Brichcja/Archive 1

Silence the Darkness

Man that was messed up. I created that page for my band, you didn't have to delete it. I'm going to recreate it whether you like it or not. And if it gets deleted again, I'll create it again, and again and again. There's no reason for you to delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndh777 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Clifton

No worries; thanks for taking the time to explain. Hesperian 05:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Invite Bristol wikiproject

Hello, this is an invitation to join WikiProject Bristol.

Thank you for editing the article Hotwells.

You may be interested in joining WikiProject Bristol. This WikiProject aims to improve the standard of all articles relating to Bristol, which includes all subdivisions of the city, major buildings, roads and other related articles.

You can help by:

• Creating new articles.
• Expanding stubs.
• Adding photographs.
• Referencing articles.
• Research topics.
• Anything else really...

For more information, see the project page, and if you have any questions you can leave them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bristol and someone will get back to you. — Addbot (talk) 02:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

— Rod ^talk 06:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

HF2

I've seen this described as a Three-center four-electron bond, but I'm not convinced. Pimentel's work is very old. Is there anything more modern? Do look this up and change it if you're sure that I am wrong.

Regarding the square brackets, they really don't belong here. They are used for transition metal complexes like [Ni(NH₃)₆]²⁺ because otherwise there would be two lots of round brackets. Where there is no ambiguity it's better to leave the brackets out. Check out the autoionisation equation , p816, Greenwood & Earnshaw.

My other objection is that square brackets are used to denote concentration in the context of chemical equilibrium, so again leave them out if they don't really add anything.

P.S. Norman Greenwood was my boss for a time and Alan Earnshaw an old friend and colleague.Petergans 20:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Are you really sure about 3c-4e bonding? My doubts are 1) the diagram in the article shows a p orbital on the central atom; surely the H 2p is much too high energy? 2) All that stuff about hypervalent is quite superceded. In those days they were a bit fixated by the octet rule. PX₅ uses 3d which are not as far above 3p in P(V) as in lower oxidation states, and the octet rule does not apply. I only have access to SciFinder if I go in to the University, so it's not easy for me to search for the results of any recent calculations.Petergans 22:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

EPR article

I moved the EPR article from Electron Spin Resonance to Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, since about 99% of the time it referred to EPR and not ESR. Take a look when you have a moment. Some sections still need a lot of work, especially the one on applications of EPR. - Astrochemist 19:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Real Samba and Chris Jackson

They were not made up dude! Im new to this and struggled with the programming to site references correctly. Real Samba FC was an ameteur team like the thousands listed on Wikipedia, they achievements were locally lauded and anyone living in the midlands of the UK would know who both Real Samba FC and Chris Jackson were. I know you didnt delete the Chris Jackson page but just because Google doesnt bring anything major up it doesnt mean they are non notable. Google aint the bible of all history of all time! Kizybit 20:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for taking time to help get me up to speed re notability guidelines, etc. Best regards, Zcoffin 15:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Columbus band notability

Yeah sure i see your point, they arn't realy notable in any way that i can think of.

Oh and can you check the band logo on the page DARTZ! for me because im not sure about it.

Black Eyed Peas: Chart History

Can you not be so tight and just leave it there.. im not gonna give up so you might aswell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetry-Bed (talk

MI-5 Persecution

This is the second article I created, and the first to receive notice of speedy deletion. I can point to several threads in different Usenet forums to attest to WP:N, and I understand that W:BLP must be adhered. If you can assist in making this a proper article, please do and give me feedback. Thank you. MMetro (talk) 20:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Linear molecule with bond angle of 180° etc

I dont think that the article was maliciously conceived, but it was redundant with diatomic molecule and kind of dopey, so I changed it to a redirect. Hopefully no one will howl. Nice work you're doing, by the way, Cheers.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Cranky sound system

From the looks of this case, this article doesn't meet A7. Try WP:AFD. --Coredesat 00:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

/othrtermdefn

No it was deliberate.

I want to create a sub page to use as a transclusion object for a table which is separately editable but not a section with its own edit link.

Is there another way to do it ?

Pee Tern (talk) 21:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I am just a beginner - how did you pick it up so quickly ? Pee Tern (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Desert Hills Middle School Article!

I understand that this article may be about a group of people. However, i have, over the years, noticed many other middle school pages on this website. What would be able to restore it???

RuP₃(CO)₂

Great job cleaning this thing up and then making it inviting for a wave of editing. You can expect that more material will flow into that article now that you got this thing started.--Smokefoot (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Square brackets around complex ions

I often see edits on my watchlist where you bracket up previously naked ions.

Would it be worth drafting a guideline on the use of such brackets for Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Style guidelines?

It would give WP chemists a chance to discuss the issue, and would provide novices like me a clear explanation of when to use this style, and why it is preferable.

Great editing, by the way.

Cheers

Ben (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dissident Warwick

Hello, Brichcja. Thanks for keeping an eye out on article quality. I'm dropping you a note to let you know that I have removed the speedy deletion template that you placed on Dissident Warwick because the article does not seem to fit the speedy deletion criterion. While the article certainly doesn't do much to assert notability, WP:CSD#A7 is specifically for people (grouped or individuals) or web content. People's products, like books and albums, are explicitly excluded, so I'm afraid that it cannot apply to a magazine. Please consider other means for addressing ongoing concerns. Feel free to let me know at my talk page if you'd like to discuss this further. Thanks. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Park Controls CSD

You have nominated the above article for speedy under G11 (in my view correctly). However, the article's creator, User:Msbfreaky keeps removing the tag and already has done so 4 times. I think he already violated the 3RR rule and I left a message at his talk page. However, this probably need to be reported since the tag is still absent (and I have two reverts there myself, when I tried to restore the tag). Nsk92 (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Imidazole

Thanks for your input. Steviedpeele (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion of "The Artist Life"

Hello, I posted an entry for Toronto band, "The Artist Life" this afternoon.

Although they are yet unsigned, this band has garnered notable recognition and play on major rock radio station Edge 102.1fm (including their award for best new artist) as well as medium rotation of their debut video for the single "Waiting Room" on Canada's Much Music.

Their list of former bands is, as well, quite impressive, including EMI recording artists, JERSEY (band) with ties to major Canadian acts, Alexis On Fire, & The Saint Alvia Cartel.

I wish to formally request the reinstatement of The Artist Life wikipedia page.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bankipedia (talk • contribs) 23:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion of The Present (2009 film)

I don't understand why my article on The Present (2009 film) has been deleted. The A7 criteria specifically excludes products of people (such as books, albums, etc) are excluded and I would assume the etc. would include films. Anyways, the article should be considered notable because the lead actor has worked with famous musicians such as Britney Spears and Mariah Carey and one of the co-stars, George Nozuka is a current R&B singer in Canada with #1 singles to his credit. I would like to have my article reposted or at least an explanation of why it was "speedily deleted". Thank you.

Ebatch (talk) 23:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

George Mallaby

I've started George Mallaby (public servant) and taken the link from Robert Gittings there. Many thanks for pointing out my mistake! Xn4 (talk) 05:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

A. E. Levett

Thank you for taking the time to provide the correct wiki style for the title. Best,MarmadukePercy (talk) 07:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Liz Carroll (musician) speedy delete

Thanks for the notification-- the deletion this morning was indeed speedy, surprisingly so. I'd thought the discography was an indication of notability... I've had the article restored, and added more explicit indications that she is indeed a notable presence on the scene, although the article is still stubby. Best regards, __Just plain Bill (talk) 23:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Carl Gentry

Twinkle did not nominate the page correctly. Please retry if you want to nominate the page for deletion. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 14:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed new policy

As a recent contributor to Deaths in 2009, you may be able to help decide on a proposed new policy. It is proposed that:

A month should be deleted from the "Deaths in [CURRENT YEAR]" page ONE WEEK after the month ends.

Please opine at Talk:Deaths_in_2009#Proposed new policy. Don't just say

• Support.

or

• Oppose.

Also state your reasons and participate in the discussion. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Jacob Ginsberg

I am confused as to why my article on Jacob Ginsberg continues to be deleted. It was deleted once by you and twice by that Gogo Dodo character. He absolutely meets the criteria for a notable person, especially in the New Orleans area- the city's newspaper even wrote a front page article on the guy! How is he not considered notable? He's a great person and deserves to be noted on Wikipedia. If Peter Morreale III, a no-name member of the Tulane University football team who hasn't seen any playing time (nor will he ever) has a Wikipedia page, then Jacob should have his own as well. He is a very notable person, and it just isn't fair.

For the record, he meets the criteria of a "creative professional". He is considered an important figure and has been cited by his successors with the Zephyrs as influential, as well as by several members of the team's front office and multiple well-known fans at the park. He isn't necessarily considered an originator of a new technique, but his dependability and hard-working manner are the reason why the Zephyrs made the role of the batboy an actual job, rather than some little kid who gets to be the "honorary batboy" and changes from one game to the next. He has also been noted in many different periodicals for his work, with the most important being that of the Times Picayune, New Orleans' prime newspaper. Please talk to me and tell me why he isn't important!

Thanks,

Scrotal69 (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

In response to your response of "Deletion of Jacob Ginsberg"

Thank you for your quick response. sorry for accusing you of that deletion, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, so I'm still learning what stuff means and does. I tried to leave a post on Gogo Dodo's talk page, but it has been semi-protected, and since I just recently joined, it will not allow me to post anything. As for Jacob Ginsberg's notability, I included three references, two of which are from the website nola.com, which is where all articles from the Times Picayune are placed on the internet and from which most of the information in the article is derived. There are other human sources I've spoken with on Jacob's behalf, but I don't know exactly how to reference humans on here just yet.

Thank you for your time and patience.

Scrotal69 (talk) 17:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Re Ongoing Edit War Shami Chakrabarti

I have no recollection of making the post about being a social worker. When I examined the origin of this it appears that the post was made by someone else using my wikipedia name on 19 April 2009 at 14:47 but signing it with my name at 08:19 I have aroused some controversy with my views on the BNP talk page amongst an explicitly racist sub section of the wiki community and I assume that this is a result of that, particularly as 86.143.99.30 (talk) has no proper identifier. This is particularly heinous abuse and what can I do about it?Streona (talk) 16:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Re your change to Dry ice of 'card ice' to 'cardice'

Can you please provide a source for your edit? The source I found (and cited) when I added the alternative name lists "card ice" as two separate words.

— Posted by Luke Goodsell, 10:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

A little digging shows that 'Cardice' is the market name used by Air Liquide UK Ltd (see here). There are also published sources that refer to it as "card ice", which is presumably a corruption but still an abbreviation of CARbon Dioxide ICE. I've updated the article to reflect this.

— Posted by Luke Goodsell, 14:48, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

What happend now?

Sorry I don't understand what are you doing now. I simply try to resize the article. Please let me know what can I do now to maintain the article Vicond (talk) 03:06, 24 September 2009 (UTC) OK I'm finish for now.I'll see what can I do tomorrow Vicond (talk) 03:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

---

Oh wow, how in the heck do you get questions answered around here? I made a wikipedia article on Will Hurd, potential Congress candidate, and it was deleted for some reason. cAN SOMEONE please help me figure all of this out? misha.og@gmail.com

CSD tagging

Hi, I've just deleted Kill Death which you tagged for deletion as {{db-nonsense}}. Thanks for tagging it but you might want to recheck the speedy criteria. Nonsense is for stuff that really isn't intelligible - not for stuff that you might disagree with. I actually deleted it as an attack, and if you'd tagged it as that it might have gone quicker as we prioritise those. cheers ϢereSpielChequers 11:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

69

Hi, and I see you're fighting a battle on the page against the vandals from the North. Why not just put the page on protect status, should chase some of them off. I added a See Also link to the Book of Lies by Crowley, see chapter 69 of the book, actually an important incident in Crowley's life occurred because of this. Thanks again, and keep up the good fight, Aleister Wilson (talk) 15:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Netsky (Artist)

Hello Brichcja. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Netsky (Artist), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being signed to a notable label indicates importance/significance. Thank you. SoWhy 19:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

IUPAC naming

I'm unfamiliar with what you're implying what was discussed on my talk page. The order of conclusions are as follows:

I agreed to cease changing the chembox headers to IUPAC names by User:Smokefoot's request. I initiated to insert IUPAC names in the other names category. I agreed to cease inserting IUPAC names in latter category and iniated to create redirect pages instead by Smokefoot's recommendation. Following persistent interferrence by User:Tetracube, I ceased to create redirect pages, and initiated adding alternative IUPAC names in the article spaces.

As of now all further action is on hold. I am not aware of what you are actually refering to?--Plasmic Physics (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Page for deletion - Adelaide's Cape

Hello there...

I think that Adelaide's Cape has enough notable sources/achievements to be included on Wikipedia now (BBC, The Independent, mainstream festival appearances confirmed etc).

He has surely achieved as much as The Kabeedies, who have a page here? http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/The_Kabeedies

Would be interested to hear your thoughts. Hope I'm discussing this in the right place?

Lauren —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigsawlauren (talk • contribs) 19:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Brien woolford

...could've gone straight to speedy deletion IMO. Uncategorized, improperly capitalized nanostub with no valid notability assertation. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:56, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Yep, but when I do that kind of thing they always get bounced because they assert notability.....Chris (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morph music

Isn't it funny how new users always give the longest arguments at AFD? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Derek Minno

Hello Brichcja. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Derek Minno, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. However I've replaced that with a BLP prod as the article is a new unsourced BLP. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 10:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Colin McLaren

Hi, I have made several amendments to the originally posted article. I would welcome your time in re-reading to see if this is in line with your thoughts. GizmoLucy Gizmolucy (talk) 12:09, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

closing AFDs

Hi, you vote commented in an AFD Pixie Geldof and then closed it as a snow close which it is not a good thing to ever do, if you vote commment then better you don't also close the issue. Also if you are going to close other AFDs please add the template of the result to the talkpage ( as is usual) so it can be easily accessed and regarded. If you need any help to add the talkpage old afd template please let me know. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 00:29, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Cool :) Although, Pixie Geldof was such an obvious keep that I don't see the problem. In fact, as a non-admin I can only do really obvious keeps. I can see how commenting and then closing might be more problematic if the nomination is more controversial though.Chris (talk) 08:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

You are still doing this. Stop doing this. It's never okay, even if you've decided you know better. Wenttomowameadow (talk) 18:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Kashi Samaddar

You tagged Kashi Samaddar for deletion but it does not appear listed at today's articles for deletion. I wasn't sure, but thought maybe it should be? Also, User:Ttpglobal the article's creator has (erroneously?) responded at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 August 7. I left a comment at User talk:Ttpglobal about the Request for Feedback posting. Shearonink (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, I just prodded it rather than took it to AFD since it does (kind of) assert some notability, but is badly written so I thought it could have a chance to be improved before (possibly) being deleted. Chris (talk) 16:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh, ok. Since the article-creator had opened a Request for Feedback it seems like they are confused about how to proceed/where to respond (& the AfD section can sometimes be useful in that regard), but a prod makes sense - gives them time to improve. Shearonink (talk) 18:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: Farm to Market Road 752

Sorry, Chris, was in the middle of putting it together using another road as a base. I'm having to save often during formation as I get either the loss-of-data or the offline excuses otherwise, which is a PITA. Anyway, you should be able to see something that looks like an article that focuses on just one road. Thanx for reading.... Awtribute (talk) 20:02, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Appreciate the tip...I've done that before with longer stuff, I guess I just thought I could get it spit out really quick but it doesn't always work out that way :D Awtribute (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massacre at Ywahoo Falls

I was able to add three two book refs to the article. I agree that a name change to "aledged" would be sensible. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: Wendy Bacon

thanks for fixes. will try & learn from these! best wishes, Ethel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethel the aardvark (talk • contribs) 12:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		For your efforts at cleaning up/saving Massacre at Ywahoo Falls, I award you this Special Barnstar. The deletion debate there has been less-than-admirable in tone and manner, and the way your good faith effort was cast aside was disgraceful. Just wanted you to know that someone appreciates the trouble you went to, regardless of the outcome. Your revised article is salvage-worthy, in my opinion. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 17:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyvio

Hello!

I'm from pt:wiki and I'd like your help about AFD process. Is List of Doug episodes a clear copyright violation of this website? This list is running for AFD at pt:wiki but some editors are claiming that is not a copyvio because it was copied from here. Would you mind nominate this list if it's infringe copyvio policy? Thanks!OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

• Interesting. I'd say actually that the other site is copying wikipedia, but it's not clear. I'll try and find out. Chris (talk) 11:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Benjamin Hale article

Hello Chris, please see my response to your proposal to delete the Benjamin Hale article. Numkinface (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Brichcja. You have new messages at Airplaneman's talk page.
Message added 18:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've userfied it to User:Airplaneman/Sedat Aloglu for the time being. Airplaneman ✈ 22:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Liam

You reverted the "Liam" page, I think you will find the information originally provided falls under Copyright from "Scrolls 'n' Things" - wish me to provide picture evidence of this Copyright via Flickr? I have rewritten the page to make it perfectly legal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.250.125 (talk) 17:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

James Hurst

Hello - a few days ago you undid a redirect I had created for the James Hurst article. I left a message on the article talk page in an attempt to discuss why I believe the article should be redirected to The Scarlet Ibis and I'm hoping that you could leave your input there. Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 14:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlene June Finley-McRee

Hi, you added Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlene June Finley-McRee to the AfD log yesterday, but did not start the AfD page or tag the original article. There are several steps to go through, see WP:AFDHOWTO.

It may be sufficient to use WP:PROD instead.

The article Arlene June Finley-McRee does not demonstrate notability, so I have added a banner to it. - Fayenatic (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks. I think Twinkle screwed up, and then I got called away before I could rectify it. I'll prod it. Chris (talk) 09:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

It was deleted in 2010, but re-created in 2011. I've left a note at User talk:Christinemhamlin; in the absence of a satisfactory response, here's an AfD which I was on the point of posting.

<snip>

– Fayenatic L (talk) 12:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

The AfD is now running at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlene June Finley-McRee; please take a look. – Fayenatic L (talk) 15:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Kathy Chitty

Good afternoon! Some time ago you amended the article on Kathy Chitty. It has been nominated for deletion. If youy have the time could you have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Chitty (3rd nomination) and add any comment you might have. Thanks. Regards Rickedmo (talk) 18:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

RfC/U draft

You have an RfC/U draft in your userspace that you haven't edited in nearly a year. Is there any reason to keep this around?--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 18:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Clothianidin (again)

Hi again. I wonder if you could take a look at the latest changes to the [clothianidin] page (esp. the new "2008 beekill incident" and "Possible contamination issues" sections) and add any comments you might have to the bottom of the clothianidin talk page, where I propose to delete both new sections. Talk:Clothianidin#Request_for_comments_on_1.29_chemical_accidents_.28again.29_and_2.29_citing_primary_research Thx USEPA James (talk) 13:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bryan Faussett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jacobite, All Souls, Society of Antiquaries, Barrow and Crundale

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Polyhedral Skeletal Electron Pair Theory/Jemmis mno rules

Hello Brichcja.I've been trying to add a link from Polyhedral Skeletal Electron Pair Theory to Jemmis mno rules, and I see that you have taken it down twice. I think that it's really important to have a link from Polyhedral Skeletal Electron Pair Theory to Jemmis mno rules because Jemmis mno rules were built off of Polyhedral Skeletal Electron Pair Theory. Do you think it would be better if I added it under a 'see also' section that I could create for the Polyhedral Skeletal Electron Pair Theory page? Or is there a reason why there should not be a link that I have described above? Please let me know. By the way thanks for taking down the other links though- I realize those might not have been as relevant. Trytowearasmileeveryday (talk) 12:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello Brichcja!

This thingy is pretty old but you are both still active. Can it be deleted? Arcandam (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Yep! Chris (talk) 19:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Have a nice day, Arcandam (talk) 19:39, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

H-bonding

You removed my statement after the IUPAC definition of H-bonding. You might not be happy with how I said it but something needs to be there because that short definition is extremely misleading. The next line kind of tries to clarify that it is a more complex topic but does quite get the job done. I have students that I'm teaching general chemistry using wiki pages to clarify topics and this definition all by itself is very confusing to them. Well even to me it made no sense until I read the rest of the IUPAC paper.

I actually believe the new definition should simply be left out. It can be referenced as existing but stating it without all the additional criteria is just incomplete.

Paul Tate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablotate (talk • contribs) 22:44, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

R. J. Ellory at BLP/N

Hi, I just can't get through to Roger Ellory (talk · contribs) (I mean two way communication). He messages me on my talk pages, I reply but get no response, other than another message which indicates that he hasn't read or understood my earlier reply. See also Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#R. J. Ellory. Have tried to point him to BLP/N after he asjed for help; and showed him how to get to View history, all to no avail. Am deeply frustrated. Regards, Esowteric+Talk 17:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quominus archives

Hi Chris, Thanks for the link to this article. A fabulous piece of detective work. Esowteric+Talk 09:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Bristol Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the Bristol Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Commercial Rooms, 43-45 Corn Street, Bristol BS1 1HT on Sunday 28 July 2013 from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Bristol topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reynold Bouyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brichcja. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ramirez Howarth

The article Ramirez Howarth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

James Rebanks

Thanks for your work on this - I created the article on The Shepherd's Life and the previous redirect from him to that book, but with his new (not really "second") book he is clearly worth an article on his own. I've done some tidying up on the new article. But I notice that you seem to have used some of the references from the original article without changing the "access-date". That date should mean "I consulted this website on this date and at that point the web page supported the content I am using it for in this article". Websites change over time, so the "access-date" is important. Because you haven't changed the date in the references you have used it is not clear whether you have actually looked at the sources you are citing. Please check your sources and correct the access dates. Thanks. PamD 18:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I notice with interest that there's a Polish wikipedia article which has got a date of birth for him - but I don't see it in any of our sources.

I also notice that in your references you've used all-numeric dates. These aren't allowed except, if you really want, as the "access-date" or in tables etc where space is really short. It gets complicated because 09-11 can mean 9th November or September 11th to different nationalities of reader. See WP:MOSNUM for more. I'm going to change all the dates to UK style dates with spelled-out months.

I now see that you copied a chunk of text from the article on the book. When you do this you must say so, rather than just claiming another author's work as your own. Please read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. PamD 19:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allen Crombie

The article Allen Crombie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned article which does not appear to pass WP:GNG (which superseeds WP:NFOOTY) and relies largely on primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Brennan Johnson

Thought I'd message here to to clarify on the Brennan Johnson article. You seem to be duplicating his stats twice? There only needs to be a single infobox for his spell with Forest from his debut with Forest to today. His time at Lincoln was a loan, so no need for another "spell" at Forest. You've also duplicated the career stats too. Check how many appearances he's made for Forest vs. what you've put? It's incorrect. Thanks. UncleTupelo1 (talk) 13:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Russell King

Hi there, I was reading the article Russell King (fraudster) when I noticed that the date of birth listed in the lead was different to that in the infobox. I then went through the revision history and found that you added the date of birth in this revision, but didn't add a citation along with it. Is there a reference on the page which includes this date of birth? If not, from where did you obtain the date that you added in this revision? Cheers — JThistle38 (talk) 12:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

I can't actually remember where I found it! I'm fairly certain it's correct though! You been listening to the BBC podcast about him? Chris (talk) 17:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

I haven't, actually! I just saw it advertised so decided I'd have a look at the Wikipedia page instead of wasting my time listening to a podcast about it. No worries about the source, I'll just have to a look around for one. Cheers — JThistle38 (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Russell King content removal

Hi, I just wanted to ask why you reverted my recent edit to this article for 'unexplained deletion'. I did explain it in the edit summary. Thanks. JohnmgKing (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Did you try and verify it? Chris (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Managed to just now, couldn't find it earlier and thought best to remove til something was found to show the content was correct. Thanks. JohnmgKing (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

OK. Chris (talk) 12:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)