User talk:Bpmscholar

Welcome!

Hi Bpmscholar! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! BuySomeApples (talk) 23:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Process science (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article is off to a solid start, and I almost approved it but it is written a bit too much like an essay at parts. Rewriting it to be a bit more like an encyclopedia entry would help, even though this sometimes means writing in a less academic manner. Also, welcome to Wikipedia! Your knowledge is very much appreciated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Process science and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bpmscholar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 00:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BuySomeApples! Thank you very much for your valuable comment that will help to improve the overall quality of the article. I will revise it to be more like an encyclopedia entry. Also thank you again for the advice regarding the Teahouse. Much appreciated! Bpmscholar (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BuySomeApples! I have just submitted and finalized my revision with the following note: "Most attention was required in the first paragraph as it sets the overall tone as an encyclopedia entry. I have trimmed it down quite a lot while incorporating secondary, reliable sources and content from later paragraphs. The intention was to focus on essential, introductory facts. Elsewhere I have made stylistic changes to make things easier for lay readers to understand." It was a great challenge to pay attention to exactly what makes an encyclopedia article as opposed to an essay. I tried to take that into account as much as possible. Thank you again for your advices! Bpmscholar (talk) 12:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Process science has been accepted

Process science, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Process science

The article Process science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Likely no WP:SIGCOV per WP:TOOSOON - This [paper https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3916817] from September 2021 proposes the creation of this field. Makes a variety of ambitious claims about encompassing all of computer science, business management, and engineering. WP:ECREE unlikely to be met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - car chasm (talk) 02:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]