Jump to content

User talk:Boven

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:College of Arms

[edit]

Thanks for your excellent additions to the various heradry articles. I see that you have deleted {{College of Arms}} from several articles relating to the College of Arms. Do you object to it? I admit, it could be better, but I think it is useful to link various elements together. -- ALoan (Talk) 03:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. As always, these things can be improved. Let me know if you have any ideas. Keep up the good work.
By the way, you can sign and date your posts on talk pages with four ~s, like this: "~~~~" -- ALoan (Talk) 12:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for asking, but where did Image:Conrad Swan York.jpg come from? It looks remarkably like a cropped version of the image on this page. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out. It came from a friend, and I had no idea that it was copyrighted. I shall contact the copyright holder to see if it can't be licensed or whatever. Boven 18:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing - I see you have been adding College of Arms and Officer of Arms to the "See also" section of the articles for the individual offices. However, there is no need for the "See also" section to include terms that are already wikilinked elsewhere in the article - the general rule is that a term should be linked the first time it is mentioned, but not thereafter. I'm sure there is a guideline about it somewhere, if you need me to point it out. -- ALoan (Talk) 19:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland

[edit]

Thanks for your note. Any plans to start a Scottish Heraldry page? I'd be glad to contribute but am concentrating efforts on botany and Scottish clans for the moment. Mark Nesbitt 08:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More than adequately covered by the Clan Nesbitt page! Mark Nesbitt 21:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heraldic beasts

[edit]

Great start on the heraldic beasts category. I think I've followed your lead by finding some other heraldic animals in the Legendary Creatures cat and labeling them as heraldic. Well done.--Eva db 06:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia (well, you're not totally new, but better late that never)!

[edit]

Hello, Boven, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, I hope that you decide to keep editing. Here are some pages that might help you in your edits. If you can't find what you need there, just put {{helpme}} on your talk page, and someone should come to help you fairly quickly, or ask me on my talk page.


Remember to sign your name on talk pages and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope that you enjoy editing! Pharaoh Hound 17:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Sorry that this welcome is late!

Charles Francis Stein, III

[edit]

I have put in a request to move the page that was Charles Stein (and is now Charles Francis Stein, III) back to Charles Francis Stein since there are a Charles Stein, Professor Emeritus of Statistics at Stanford University, a Charles J. Stein (musician), and a Charles Stein who is a columnist for the Boston Globe, all of whom are rather more famous and prominent (though certainly no more laudable in their worldly contributions) than Charles Francis Stein, III. Perhaps a disambiguation page is in order also, in addition to the moving of the excellent founder of the American College of Heraldry to Charles Francis Stein from Charles Stein? Thanks very much, both for your consideration and for your additions to Wikipedia. Much appreciated. Also, please forgive any carnage I have created in the edit logs of Charles Francis Stein, III; I had a senior moment while doing some of the editing, and I hope no one is adversely affected. Please also see the talk page for more; again, I hope that I have not done anything offensive in this process. Note, finally, that I have changed all links to Charles Stein (the heraldrist and skipper) to point to the currently appropriate page, and put a preliminary profile of Charles Stein (the statistician) at Charles Stein.

Thanks again. F.Shelley 02:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Heralds

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 11 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Heralds, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

A nice little article! Enjoyed reading it, and probably will pick up the novel as I enjoy non-chronological timelines. It's on the main page for DYK now. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 21:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Thank you very much for the barnstar! It is higly appreciated :) Inge 18:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LUL

[edit]

Have you seen WikiProject Underground? Lenny 07:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnqadamsarms.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 3 October, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John de Havilland, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Fair use rationale for Image:Redeemer Arms.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Redeemer Arms.gif. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 13 October, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Bruges, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Peta 05:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On October 16, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Don Pottinger, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]

Thank you for forwarding me the Did Yo Know box.--Forlornandshorn 20:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldry

[edit]

Hi Dave,

Got your email. Great job on the rewrite, I've been meaning to do something like that since the article had a peer review (which went nowhere) a couple of months ago. It's much more coherent than before, and is now cited properly! The history section is still a bit light; a quick look at the French and German versions shows they talk about a lot of stuff other than the rules of blazon, so maybe we can pick up some ideas from there. It felt a little Anglocentric in places, although this is probably a consequence of most of the English-language literature on the topic being about British heraldry. Maybe once a few more of the Heraldry by country articles get written we can mention some of the differences. Also, I wonder if it is necessary to have both the Image:Divisions of the field.png and Image:Ordinaries.png images, in there, as they are quite long, and in Internet Explorer lead to some unsightly white space, although everything's fine in Firefox.

Btw, I saw your 'officers of arms in the ODNB' proposal. I think it's a good idea, and I do have access to the ODNB, however I'm going to be quite busy for the next few months so I won't be much help with this.

Keep up the good work (including the nice image uploads) ! Dr pda 19:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
I award you this Editor's Barnstar for letting the heraldry article have it. Keep up the great work. Forlornandshorn 21:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL Picture of South African Heralds

[edit]

Can you include a bit more information about the rationale for GFDL permission on the image that you uploaded of the South African Heralds. I uploaded it the commons here: File:Image-Marcel van Rossum and Themba Mabaso.JPG, and someone questioned it.--Forlornandshorn 18:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Order of St John

[edit]

That looks like a fine system of organization, dave. I'll try to help implement that as I have time. Best of luck!--Eva bd 21:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Johnqadamsarms.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnqadamsarms.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 14:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:SomersetHeraldBadgeofOffice.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 09:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AHS_Arms_by_Alexander_Kurov_(PNG).png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AlbanyBadge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:AlbanyBadge.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AlbanyBadge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SomersetHeraldBadgeofOffice.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SomersetHeraldBadgeofOffice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Heraldic Authority Review

[edit]

Canadian Heraldic Authority has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Eva bd 21:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Order of St John

[edit]

Several months ago you commented on a reorganization of the St John Orders articles. I'm trying to figure it out again, and your help in reaching a consensus is most welcome here, assuming that you're active at some point. This is an effort to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks a lot.--Eva bd 19:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:New Zealand Herald.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:New Zealand Herald.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:AHS Arms by Alexander Kurov (PNG).png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AHS Arms by Alexander Kurov (PNG).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:New Zealand Herald.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:New Zealand Herald.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for help

[edit]

Would you mind add some references of the Inter-service decorations of the United States military?

Thank you.--东北虎(Manchurian Tiger) 08:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Authorship

[edit]

Hi, can you give a source for this photo:

File:Conrad Swan York.jpg

Thanks.--Eva bd 14:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:CrossofVOSJ.jpg

[edit]

Image:CrossofVOSJ.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Star of the Venerable Order of St John.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Star of the Venerable Order of St John.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

Your vandalism on article Christianity has been reverted, please refrain from vandalism and make such edits in the sandbox in the future. Soxwon (talk) 04:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Anstis Garter.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Anstis Garter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 20:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of XXVIth International Congress of Genealogical and Heraldic Sciences

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, XXVIth International Congress of Genealogical and Heraldic Sciences, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XXVIth International Congress of Genealogical and Heraldic Sciences. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Abductive (reasoning) 04:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ICGHS

[edit]

Template:ICGHS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Abductive (reasoning) 15:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Boven! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 331 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Alan Dickins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AHS Arms by Alexander Kurov (PNG).png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AHS Arms by Alexander Kurov (PNG).png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Zealand Herald.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand Herald.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Civil Air Patrol Awards

[edit]

Hi there, just taking a quick look at your work in your sandbox, and one quick comment that comes to mind is the order you've put certain things in. You have the Senior Member awards and Cadet awards separated from each other by a lot of material with the Service awards. Considering that the Senior and Cadet awards are in many ways complements of each other and similar types awards, it would seem to me to make more sense to have these sections go sequentially with each other, rather than separated. You might also want to think of a different title for those sections than "awards," at least on the cadet side. The majority of the items listed are achievement ribbons, and not awards. Only those for the milestones are awards. --OuroborosCobra (talk) 03:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karte_Grenzach-wyhlen_in_Deutschland.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Karte_Grenzach-wyhlen_in_Deutschland.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Common Good (talk) 19:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Academic Regalia

[edit]

Hello, Boven! Between you, me, and Shoreranger, the caption on that photo is really getting a workout! If you have time, maybe you'd like to take a look at the most recent edit and then at the article's discussion page, where I've noted the problem areas and suggested solutions. Your input is very welcome (if you are interested). Armadillopteryx (talk) 01:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:FinlagganPursuivant.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:FinlagganPursuivant.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck Carr (Civil Air Patrol)

[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Chuck Carr (Civil Air Patrol). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

Aloha!

My name is Victor Grigas, I’m a storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco working on collecting unique and interesting stories from Wikipedians that can be used to compel donations for the 2011 fundraiser.

I found your user name on this list: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_Chicago

If you are interested in participating, and would like to schedule a telephone or Skype interview with me, please send me an email (vgrigas@wikimedia.org) along with any questions you may have.

Thanks for your time!

Victor, User:Victorgrigas Victor Grigas (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS If you know of anyone with whom I should speak please let me know :)

DYK nomination of Academic regalia of Stanford University

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Academic regalia of Stanford University at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Richwales 04:03, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Academic regalia of Stanford University

[edit]

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Academic regalia of Stanford University

[edit]

The introduction has so much repetitive and very poor writing in it that it is clear you haven't edited it properly! Since it is on the front page, you really need to get back to it urgently and remove the repeated words and phrases. Amandajm (talk) 02:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a message on the talk page of the article detailing some of the problems. Amandajm (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Conrad Swan York.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Conrad Swan York.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 03:46, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elmhurst Christian Reformed Church

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Heraldry and Vexillology project

[edit]

Greetings! I have requested commentary from members of the heraldry and vexillology project at WT:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology#Current direction of the HV project. Please comment there. Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 6 February

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion

[edit]

Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 23:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VOSJ

[edit]

Hi Boven: it is wonderful that so much attention is being paid to the Order of St John! This constant battle of Wiki idealogy over what is in actual fact correct is becoming a bit wearisome. Needless to say, it is a great pity that the Order of St John page wasn't set up correctly in the first place, which is what I think is causing the problem. There are now so many references to the Venerable Order on the internet (in no small part I suppose because Wiki propogates this terminology), but you will find that on official literature (& indeed in normal parlance by those au fait with correct form) the order has never been styled as such. I think it would be an exaggeration to say that leaving it as "Venerable" rather than changing it to "Most Venerable" was agreed on my Talk page: in my view it was a resignation by me to the status quo. "Venerable" nonetheless remains incorrect and therefore should not be reverted where mistakes are spotted and corrected to "Most Venerable". Also the breast star depicted was not that of KGStJ but that of KJStJ (qv: http://www.cmp-cpm.forces.gc.ca/dhr-ddhr/chc-tdh/chart-tableau-eng.asp?ref=StJohn- ). Since so much time and energy is being expended on this matter (when I have already pointed out the correct form but have for some unknown reason been overruled (by people unknown to me and of course vice versa)) why don't we, or Wiki, now get this matter correct? Best & thanks again for your continued interest in this matter. M Mabelina (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boven: thanks for being back in touch & I agree that the Order of St John situation is a bit of a wrangle - and I wholeheartedly agree with you that the short-form of Order of St John is correct. However, no doubt someone will pop up one day & say that the Order of St John also applies to the Order of Malta which is also true. So I guess do we keep muddling along or do we do something about getting the prefix sorted? Whilst Venerable as a colloquialism is well understood, what do you think about Wikipedia and its users' almost near-obsession with MOS etc when this is patently wrong and Most Venerable is the proper prefix? Look forward to hearing about whether MOS means anything! but more importantly what to do about it - looking forward to hearing - cheers & best wishes, M Mabelina (talk) 20:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I'll happily provide chapter & verse on the subject if you concur..

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Order of St John in the United States

[edit]

On 13 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Order of St John in the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actor Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. was one of the founding members of the American Society of the Order of St John? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Order of St John in the United States. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Order of St John in the United States), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 01:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AHS Arms by Alexander Kurov (PNG).png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AHS Arms by Alexander Kurov (PNG).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Boven. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Boven. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American College of Heraldry

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on American College of Heraldry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://americancollegeofheraldry.org/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chetsford (talk) 18:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heraldry Society of Scotland for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heraldry Society of Scotland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heraldry Society of Scotland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 18:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Heraldry Society of Scotland has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Drchriswilliams (talk) 22:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OSJ

[edit]

As I indicated in my original edit the OSJ statues say use Post noms internally but they are not used externally (except for OSJ business). Which is why wiki guidance in a number of places has previously agreed not to use them here. eg List_of_post-nominal_letters_(United_Kingdom) "When listing the honours and awards enjoyed by any person it is not customary to include the Order of St John, as this is a Royal Order and not a State Order, and so confers no precedence." Garlicplanting (talk) 10:03, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I was using MOS:POSTNOM as my guide for using the post-nomials of the Order of St John. It says "Post-nominal letters, other than those denoting academic degrees, should be included in the lead section when they are issued by a country or widely recognizable organization with which the subject has been closely associated." As the Lord Prior for a dozen years, I'd say that qualifies. The Manual of Style seems like it ought to be one of the last words on the topic. In fact, the page at List_of_post-nominal_letters_(United_Kingdom) doesn't really say anything about St John post-nomials and their use on Wikipedia. If the Manual of Style is updated or some other compelling case can be made to leave them off the lead, I'll probably go back and add them in to Lord Vestey's page. Thanks again.--dave-- 15:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:POSTNOM like most general guides is a broad brush which is why we have local MOS. Most countries don't have authorised PNs. Those that do in the examples we are covering depreciate the OSJ use (Not simply the UK but Canada Australia and others...) because it is not a state order. I can't be bothered to edit war this but that is how it has been handled generally following national usage. Garlicplanting (talk) 11:38, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. I've re-added the post-nomials to Lord Vestey's page. Is there a local MOS page that describes what should be done specifically with the Order of St John? I haven't been able to find it. Thanks again.--dave-- 15:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Boven. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Henry Paston-Bedingfeld York.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Henry Paston-Bedingfeld York.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfD at Commons

[edit]

Just making sure you get this RfD message for a Commons file you contributed to. --Nemoschool (talk) 06:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Endure Pursuivant for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Endure Pursuivant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endure Pursuivant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 09:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boven&oldid=1224927527"