User talk:Bolinda
Thank you!
Welcome
[edit]
|
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome
[edit]No need to thank me; welcome newbies is common courtesy around here. :P If you ever need help, you can always contact me here. Good luck, and happy editing! (Oh, and be sure to sign your posts. :D ) Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 04:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Greetings!
[edit]Wow! You've been busy in the 90 minutes since you started editing with this account. Over 50 edits! Very impressive!!
The reason I'm here is: You added DCL to Cecil Rhodes in the opening sentence. Apparently, this is contrary to the MoS (Manual of Style), so it's fairly likely someone will revert the edit. Example: this edit. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 05:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! I'm finding this editing very fun. I'm starting with small tinkering for now. Thanks for writing. I'm still learning and your comment is instructional.Bolinda (talk) 05:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
It's good to hear you're enjoying it! If you need any help, drop me a line on my talk page. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 05:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Stalking
[edit]It's very clear to me that you have deliberately accessed the contributions that I have made and then systematically gone through each article to make changes. This is known as stalking and I warn you this is not only deeply offensive it carries the possibility of removal from wikipedia. This is notice to you that I will be making a formal complaint to ask that this be investigated. Contaldo80 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Very wierd that you sat that. I looked at my contributions and I don't see what your talking about. You weren't even "online" when I began editing so how could I follow you? In fact I looked back at a few and you weren't even the last person to write before me and sometimes not even close! I have not had "systematically gone through each article to make changes" to your contributions. I don't think the contributions I've made can offend anyone since they are only small things that I fix because I notice that make it look nicer and the only one exception was one where someone says that I can't do something because of a manuel of style which was ok because I didnt know about it before I did it. I think you confuse me with someone other.Bolinda (talk) 22:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC)B
No definately you. I don't need to be online for you to track the pages I have edited in the past. Why else would you make amendments to an article on the actor Charles Hawtrey and the historian Filip Callarmachus. Seems too much of a coincidence. I'm willing to belive it's an honest mistake but don't do it again please. I didn't particularly appreciate your disparaging comments about issues of sexuality either. Contaldo80 (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Please don't make that change - alternative names should always come before dates. No doubt the WP:MOS covers the point. Johnbod (talk) 00:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)