User talk:BloodmoonIvy

Welcome

Hello, BloodmoonIvy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Kelly ^hi! 04:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism broadly construed.
– Lionel ^(talk) 04:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Okashina Okashi - Strange Candy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penny Arcade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Culture of San Antonio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convention (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steampunk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Table-top (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tephra: The Steampunk RPG, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gnomes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tephra

Thanks for the tip! I have a tip for you. Check who made that last edit - it wasn't me! It was somebody by the name of Rpgguru. I understand how you might be confused on this issue but there should be no confusion at all. Good reviews on Amazon posted up by people that worked on the game is a conflict of interests and deceptive. Not filling all of their kickstarter rewards is fraudulent. Do you realize that they raised 22 times the money they were asking for? Is it okay and acceptable that they have not filled all of their back rewards? Is it cool that they do not even list the names of all of their backers on their own website? You think you've outsmarted someone just because you have deleted an edit they made? Hardly. The word is still going to get out! There is a blog or two I know of that's going to post up those issues. There are also the Google+ communities for Tephra, Steampunk, Tabletop Gaming, and Kickstarter (just to name a few) where this information can be posted. I'm not mad because I bought the game because I was not one of the suckers that got tricked. I am mad that people are falling for the Cracked Monocle shenanigans and wasting their money on a product that is sub-par information wise and a company that will turn their backs on them when they get money in hand?

PLEASE read WP:GF - I am assuming you are trying to be constructive, please grant the same benefit of the doubt, as well. I know RPG Guru made the edit. I've been talking to him, as well; there was no confusion. Both you and he added similar thing. You seem to be bringing in a lot of outside info that isn't relevant to the article. My main concern is that Wikipedia has strict rules for what can be posted and what can't. If you have a reliable news source, that's one thing. If you look at the article, you'll find I already summarized the Kickstarter thing based on what conforms to what we can include. Please discuss on the talk page instead of continually posting the same thing. BloodmoonIvy (talk) 20:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's kind of strange that you erased everything instead of just the RPGGeek stuff. BTW, most of that stuff is covered elsewhere. I know you might *think* you are being impartial but you are NOT. All one has to do is read the comments on Kickstarter and on their own forums and Cracked Monocle to know there has been problem after problem. You say the information is not relevant to the article but it is. How about someone looking for a new game to play? With the rising costs of paper products customers need to be informed about fraudulent or controversial practices. I would definitely say that Cracked Monocle fits the bill on those counts. What is wrong with the potential customer base being informed before they make a decision? I am not trying to be a jerk but something simple like posting the names of the backers on their website should have been the first reward fulfilled. That is EASY stuff! How can they attend convention after convention with a large entourage and still make claims of being short on cash for filling rewards? They earned over TWENTY TWO times MORE than their goal. At this point, the whole mess has left the realm of all things normal and decent and went straight to the strange and utterly ridiculous! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keeperofthesevenkeys (talk • contribs) 20:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At this point I am moving the issue to Dispute Resolution. I have advised you to use the page's talk page for this, but you seem to insist on including edits that do not meet Wikipedia's standard for inclusion, despite my attempts to seek a compromise on the matter. BloodmoonIvy (talk) 20:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All I want to know is how stating factual truths in the form of concerns expressed by unhappy customers is inflammatory? People should be aware of what is going on. I admit that I got a little heated in my response. Yes, I did say I would post it on blogs and Google+ communities. Was I serious? No, I was trying to show you that this escapade is ridiculous. I should have talked instead of resorting to sarcasm. You claimed that you wanted to use talk to clear it up but you insisted on editing out what I put in without discussion. How is showing the truth to other people not being objective?Keeperofthesevenkeys (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I invited you to discuss this on the talk page of the article. Instead of posting feedback on the compromise edit, you just put the same thing back in multiple times after being asked politely to stop. That means I have to stop asking quite so nicely and use Wikipedia policy to get the article stable. BloodmoonIvy (talk) 20:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tephra: The Steampunk RPG, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aether (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BloodmoonIvy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BloodmoonIvy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BloodmoonIvy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Healthy You & Carol Alt

The article A Healthy You & Carol Alt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Barely-sourced stub, no changes in content or verifiability since 2013

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]