User talk:Blackandgoldtruthbetold

May 2017

Hello, I'm RedPanda25. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Kurt Riley, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Red Panda 25 14:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance templates

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Kurt Riley. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blackandgoldtruthbetold. When another editor adds a template such as {{Notability}} to an article, it is usually because they have genuine good-faith concerns that the subject may not statisfy Wikipedia's relevant notability guidelines. Ringbang is a pretty experienced editor so they probably were just randomly tagging articles on a whim. I also have similar concerns about Riley's Wikipedia notability since most of the cited sources seem to be primary sources which do not help show notability. The tag is only meant to alert other editors that there may be a problem which needs some attention; it does not necessarily mean the article is in immediate danger of being deleted. So, if you want to discuss Riley's notability and the reasons why Ringbang added the template, they feel free to do so at Talk:Kurt Riley. If you are able to provide more citations to independent reliable sources which show that Riley meets the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO, then please do so and then remove the template. Simply removing the template without addressing the issue at hand or at least explaining why it is not an issue at all is not really helpful and will almost always lead to the template being re-added. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Hi, I flagged the article after checking it per your peer-review request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review#Kurt Riley. —Ringbang (talk) 01:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kurt Riley

Hello, Blackandgoldtruthbetold. You have new messages at Ringbang's talk page.
Message added 23:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]