User talk:Bjaouane

Welcome!

Hello, Bjaouane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Alacrity25 (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EXo Platform (software) (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"Enterprise edition’s subscription starting price of $27,500 per year allows for up to 300 active users. If you need a subscription allowing additional users, contact us" - Wikipedia is not an advertising site for your business. Pay for some promotion, rather than trying to get it for free here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EXo Platform (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:EXo Platform (software), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 21:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bjaouane! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 21:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EXo Platform (software)

Hello Bjaouane,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged EXo Platform (software) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Hello SamHolt6,

I need your help please to validate this page. And I have a corporate page that come on duplicate. How can I do? SamHolt6 (talk) 15:25, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. --SamHolt6 (talk) 15:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EXo Platform (software)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jaouanebrahim (talk) 16:35, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article eXo Platform. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. You are now also violating the Wikipedia Behavioral Guideline on Canvassing by requesting multiple individual editors tell you how to "save" this article. I've seen no indication that you've yet to read a single linked policy in any of the replies you've been given but that does not mean you are somehow exempt from these rules. If I see any further disruption on behalf of your paid editing, I will report you for administrative action. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have never changed this page that has existed for a long time. Otherwise, my goal is not to rape people but to find a way to improve quality. Excuse me if I have abused someone but just i search just how and best practices Bjaouane (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on my talk page, you are not competent to use this project. Don't do it. Your most recent statement is barely even English and you tried to make it look like I signed it. This is disruptive and I've fixed the signature. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:EXo Platform (software)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:EXo Platform (software), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bjaouane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i want to edit eXo platform and make it reliable

Decline reason:

You forgot to address the reason for your block. WP:GAB can help you understand what we look for in an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 16:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bjaouane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason of block is multiple account but i have this only account and I want to edit eXo Platform page to make it visible and clean. Please help me

Decline reason:

> i have this only account
Bullshit. MER-C 17:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bjaouane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I stop using any other account and I want to have access to contribute. Please help me or advice me how to unlock the IP and account.

Decline reason:

So you were using multiple accounts, then? So your previous unblock request was a lie? Why then should we believe anything you say? Right now the standard offer looks like your only route back to editing. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:48, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bjaouane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I discovered that one of my colleagues using the same IP tried to change the same page and it's not my account. So, it's not a lie but I promise to use an only account for this IP. Please help me to unblock my account and IP.)

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts (or coordinated editing by three accounts). —DoRD (talk) 14:24, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Talk page stalker) Comment to reviewing admin: The above style of English claiming WP:NOTME is very similar to the style previously demonstrated by this user identity and also very similar to the Jaouanebrahim identity (talk page of a deleted page). Just in case this is reviewed by an admin not familiar with the history. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 13:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bjaouane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22965 was submitted on Oct 16, 2018 15:16:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]