User talk:BillyColl

OK,

Do you work for strongbit's competitors? So you delete my posts and they have similar advertisement pages links etc. so when I'm tried to delete them too you restore them. I'm going to contact to whom it may concern you ca ban you as administrator. If you are against product pages and links so delete them all if not - don't touch mine ones

Welcome!

Hello, BillyColl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

EXEcryptor was deleted by consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXECryptor. If you wish it to be undeleted you are free to present any new evidence of its significance at deletion review. Just zis Guy you know? 10:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to StarForce

Your recent edit to StarForce (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 11:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You have blanked articles; this is considered vandalism and you are adding links to a deleted article to other articles. This may be considered spamming. You have also added links to external sites which have been reverted as spam by other editors. Please take the itme to read the links in the Welcome section above. If you continue to make edits which disrupt Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing. If in doubt, discuss your edits on the artcles' Talk pages. Thanks. Just zis Guy you know? 11:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Just zis Guy you know? 11:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you come back, there are some things you need to know.

The way to remove content is to go through one of the deletion processes.
The way to get content restored is to go to deletion review.
The way to promote your business or product is to pay for advertisements in external media. Wikipedia is not a link farm.

If you follow these rules, and the good editing practices outlined in the Welcome section above, you shuld havee no further problems. If you carry on as you have today, you may be blocked indefinitely. You can ask questions at the Helpdesk or the Village Pump. You can ask an admin (like me). Just zis Guy you know? 12:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, so if you are against only my posts. I don't do any spam advertising campaign on Wikipedia. I post just related links on the subject close-related pages. It was before some links to us remained on Wikipedia and all was still... BTW 'code morphing' in Win32 apps protection is really invention of StrongBit as a result of hard and long scientific research. Yes now it is implemented in a commercial product. But the page content has been written by strongbit them-selves as code morphing brief description and contributed to Wikipedia. So why to prohibit the link from the page contributed by people on thhir own site? Internal links on code morphing I posted on the related pages too. They were deleted as well by you. Why? In the same time there are lots and lots of blatant advertisements as 'article' (i.e. StarForce, PELock, ASPack that are commercial products)??? I tried to write an article decribing EXECryptor without any adv claims as "best" "strongest" etc. - you immediately deleted it. I have only to report your such behaviour to main wikipedia contacts... — Preceding unsigned comment added by BillyColl (talk • contribs)

As I said above, EXECryptor was reviewed and deleted some time back. You are welcome to bring it to deletion review. If you need help negotiating the process, let me know. That is the first step. This is not at all personal, it's the same for everybody. If you are ready to work productively, not blank pages, and let process take its course then I will unblock your account. Just zis Guy you know? 13:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always ready to work productively if you were. If I were an abuser there would no problem to me to change registration/IP details :) I'm for honest and just work

I carefully read the deletion review and know why ex-version of EXECryptor article was deleted. Now I wrote unbiased description without any advertisement claims. Other packers authors did the same before and their commercial products descriptions and even external and internal links are not victims of admin repressions as mine are. If you unblock my account and stop to delete my posts and links on appropriate pages I will neither delete other products pages/links nor spam irrelevant pages. Otherwise I am forced to contact unblock-en-l@wikipedia.org and other adresses I will find with all details of our conflict

The article was deleted because there was no evidence of the importance of the software. If you have new evidence of its importance then take it to WP:DRV. Under no circumstances should you blank other articles, as this is blatant vandalism. You are more than welcome to contact whoever you like. You can also post the {{unblock}} unblock template on this page and give the reason. But since I've already said that if you are going to work productively I'll unblock you, you might not get much joy. So, are you content to take the article to DRV and wait for the result of that before adding it to other articles? If so, the unblock button is waiting.

One last thinig: if you sign your Talk comments with ~~~~ then the server will automagically add your username and timestamp. Just zis Guy you know? 18:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will be civil. So I would like my account to be unblocked. I've read the DR, but could you please explain me why the Code Morphing article that is not for deletion cnnot be linked to other relevant? And why it cannot have an external link on its author?