User talk:Bhumiya

Image tagging for Image:O'Lachlan.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:O'Lachlan.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hardtack

What exactly was innacurate (and what did you change) specifically. I might debate, but I need info. Since your user talk page is quite full, I would request that you try my own page, which is blank. Therefore, it would be quite quicker in response time.

Pirámide de Mayo

Me da gusto que hayas traducido el artículo sobre la Pirámide de Mayo, del cual soy su principal editor. Soy colaborador de la wiki española y uno de mis temas preferidos son los monumentos y obras arquitectónicas de Buenos Aires.

Cualquier cosa, a tu disposición.--Roberto Fiadone 12:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bashir Ahmad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bashir Ahmad.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prilidiano Pueyrredón

Hi! I wanted to thank you for the great translation of Prilidiano Pueyrredón. I wanted also to remind you of the Argentinenotice board, where you can post the new Argentina-related articles, or leave a comment on any subject. good wiking, --Mariano(t/c) 16:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I suggest you add any new Argentina-related article to the notice board; it will let interested people to know about it, and help it improve it. Thanks again, and take care. --Mariano(t/c) 12:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion

I just thought I'd mention that there is a deletion debate going on about an article you created, Japanocentrism. Please visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanocentrism if you'd like to join in the discussion. Thanks, and happy editing.... Dekimasu よ! 05:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Czech Wikipedian's notice board

You are invited to join Wikipedia:Czech Wikipedian's notice board! The Czech notice board can be used for discussions on Czech-related topics; to plan your Czech-related projects; and ask for, or offer assistance for Czech-related subjects. Editors are encouraged to sign their nickname on the list of active participators. --Thus Spake Anittas 02:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply at language desk

Thought I'd let you know as it's been a couple of days since you asked. Drmaik 06:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uruguay

Hi friend, I just wanna thank you for your concern with my country. It is not common to see American people with your interests towards an almost unknown place for you fellow citizens. Once more, thanks for contributing to spread the available information on Uruguay. Finally, if you would like to see it, you can check out some of my articles in the Spanish wikipedia, just for you to have a more complete source to carry on with your great activity. Kind regards, --Gustave - May I help you? 19:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your help is always welcome! ¡Tu ayuda siempre es bienvenida! We need more volunteers like you. Greetings, --Gustave - May I help you? 01:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vaz Ferreira

Hi! First of all, let me congratulate you once more for your great contributions on Uruguay to this project. You're doing a nice work, here! Anyway, reading your article I only found one minor mistake and that is when you say: "Sobre la propiedad de la tierra", and translate it as "On the Ownership of Earth". Well, the problem is that in Spanish when the word "Tierra" is in capital letters, it would mean "Earth", but when is not, the proper translation is "land". "Tierra" refers to the planet, and "tierra" to the land or a rural property. In this case, the second one is correct. The rest is ok; it seems you really dominate the main structures of Spanish language but avoid speaking in plural, because that is incorrect. I mean, when you say "leáis" or "vosotros" you are talking to me as if I were more than one person. That usage, however, was characteristic of mediaeval Spanish but now it is seemed as an archaism, except in Spain, where "vosotros" is the second person plural (in English, "You")- The second person singular - in English also "you" - is "tú" (or "vos", not vosotros, in Rioplatense Spanish). Well, that's all, keep going! I'm really amused, man. Greetings, --Gustave - May I help you? 12:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to be of any help. I supposed you have learned Mexican Spanish because is the most common one in USA, since the vast Mexican population living in your country. Personally, I speak Rioplatense Spanish because I'm Uruguayan, and that is maybe the reason why most people mistake me for an Argentine, since we both share the same variety of language (with slight differences). However, since I'm currently living in northern Spain, I've been much influenced by the standard Spanish. Well, thank you again for your interest and I expect you to go on, if you like. Here are some suggestions: Horacio Quiroga, prolific writer and man of letters (a featured article on the Spanish wikipedia) - maybe you can expand it; Eduardo Galeano, another important writer, who has been awarded several times, and whose reputation is really high among Spanish and non-Spanish speaking countries (perhaps you'll have to choose information from another source, since the article in Spanish is also poor); and, I've worked on several articles related to Uruguayan history and geography (as you can check it out if you go to my user page in the Spanish wikipedia). The information available here is really poor; and there is nothing about Uruguayan cuisine. With respect to the latter, I've written a quite complete article on the subject. Well, that's all for now. Do the best you can, without hurry :-). Greetings, --Gustave - May I help you? 21:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it seems so. Well, thanks :-). --Gustave - May I help you? 22:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC) (maybe it would be a good idea to move the page to Uruguayan cuisine, since there are articles like Argentine cuisine o Italian cuisine that follow that rule).[reply]

Groussac

Hi again, friend. Concerning your message, I just found one little omission. When you say: "Groussac taught me how to write in Spanish", you should have said instead: "Groussac, who was French, taught me how to write in Spanish". If you have a look at the orginal article you'll read exactly what I have written (but in Spanish, of course). That's all, the rest is perfect! Nice work, by the way. Greetings, Gustave - May I help you? 23:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo Cordera

Great job on that article. I wanted to ask you to publicite your new Argentina related articles at the Argentine notice board if you have the time to do it, so other people with interest in the topic can become aware of the new article and perhaps contribute to it. Thank you and good wiking. --Mariano(t/c) 11:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bashir_Ahmad.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bashir_Ahmad.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 11:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama Roll Call

Hello, you are currently listed as a member of Wikiproject Futurama though you may be inactive. This seems to be the case for many members so I am sending this message to help renew interest in working on these articles. If you are still interested in working on Futurama related tasks please visit the wikiproject page to see how you can help. If you have time please also join in the recent discussions on the talk page, in particular I would personally appreciate comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama#A new proposal for episode articles. Thank you for your time, hopefully I didn't annoy you too much. If you would not like to receive messages such as this in the future then consider removing yourself from Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama/List of participants. Happy editing. Star dust 8212 01:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stippled_Borges.PNG

Did you draw this image? Calliopejen1 01:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That's an awesome drawing. We've actually talked at WT:NONFREE about wanting to do stippled portraits for deceased (or even living) people where there's no available free image. If you have the inclination to do this, you should come to WT:NONFREE and volunteer your services... I'm sure there's no shortage of portraits you could illustrate. :) Calliopejen1 14:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IPA templates

Hi,

Just to let you know, we now have IPA templates that link to pronunciation keys that are more accessible than the main IPA article. They are explained at {{IPA}}. kwami 23:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Abkarian.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Abkarian.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytfin 23:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Carmen_Polo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Carmen_Polo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Franco_and_Polo.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Franco_and_Polo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Adolfo_Suarez_2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Adolfo_Suarez_2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lightereul kyeora.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lightereul kyeora.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Gibson

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tony Gibson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Tony Gibson. BPMullins | Talk 13:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Prince Mongo

I have nominated Prince Mongo, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Mongo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 13:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Criminaloid

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Criminaloid, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Lincolnite (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hexidecimal Multiplication Table.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hexidecimal Multiplication Table.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Commonlingua (talk) 09:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Paulskirche Casinofraktion JPG.jpg

Image:Paulskirche Casinofraktion JPG.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Paulskirche Casinofraktion.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Paulskirche Casinofraktion.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lunchmeat

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lunchmeat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 05:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bhumiya! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 178 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

César Vidal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Laurent Gaudé - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Futurama revival

Hello. WikiProject Futurama is being revived. Since you are listed as a participant here, you have received this message to make sure you still are. If you like to help update the WikiProject, please discuss here. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Futurama-related articles. GamerPro64 (talk) delivered by MuZebot 06:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bouchee listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bouchee. Since you had some involvement with the Bouchee redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 02:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What to do with the Persondata article

Hello. I was trying to find information on what "Persondata" was and came across the Persondata article, which has been deleted multiple times. I wrote on the talk page about how there seems to be a problem - the article has been deleted multiple times, but there seems to be a legitimate issue where people can't find information.

I see you created an article there once so I thought I would leave you a message - if you have input on what we could do to solve this please visit the Persondata talk page and leave a note. Thanks! --Culix (talk) 04:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ウ.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:ウ.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:43, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blind Pew for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blind Pew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Pew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Depression storage capacity

The article Depression storage capacity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced dicdef, untouched since 2009

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Depression storage capacity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Depression storage capacity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depression storage capacity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:44, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Russell square.JPG

The file File:Russell square.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Marmol.gif

The file File:Marmol.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Katakana e.PNG

The file File:Katakana e.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Hiragana e.PNG

The file File:Hiragana e.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Wilhelm Eduard Albrecht.JPG

The file File:Wilhelm Eduard Albrecht.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Germanic language countries.JPG

The file File:Germanic language countries.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Germanic languages.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Governor of Montevideo

The article Governor of Montevideo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Presumably unsourced articles were fine 15 years ago, but if I had created this just now I doubt it would last more than a few days without cites

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 12:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]