User talk:Bgourgeot

Bgourgeot, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bgourgeot! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Sourcing

Hell and than you for your edits. I reverted part of your recent edit here, as you did not provide any sources. Sources are needed for all material on Wikipedia, per WP:VERIFIABLE. I also removed some original research from the Emmer Sewell article. You can't add essay-like personal conclusions, replete with biblical quotes as you did here:

For example, Sewell stacked and arranged cups on her mailbox as a metaphor for Psalm 23:5 "You prepare a feast for me in the presence of my enemies. You honor me by anointing my head with oil. My cup overflows with blessings."(Cite web|url=https://biblehub.com/psalms/23-5.htm%7Ctitle=Psalm 23:5 You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies. You anoint my head with oil; my cup overflows.|website=biblehub.com|access-date=2019-06-11) Thus, she anoints her mailbox and the mail carries that bring her news will optimism and spiritual blessings.

We do not publish the personal opinions or essay-style writing of editors in articles, per WP:OR. Please avoid adding this kind of material in future. Thanks! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:55, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

I just reverted your addition of unsourced biography material to Agatha Bennett. If you would like your contribs to "stick", always provide sources.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Thank you for your excellent edits to the Gee's bend quilters articles. I notice you only using the Souls Grown Deep biographies as a source. It's less than ideal when biography material has a single source. If you can, have a look for further sources that also supports the claims. Thanks!

Welcome!

Hello, Bgourgeot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:18, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello! Now that you have disclosed that you are a paid editor, you need to also disclose on the talk pages of each article and draft you edit or have edited as a paid employee. See the WP:COI page for further info.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A template you can use on talk pages of articles that you edit is as follows.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Bgourgeot (talk · contribs) has been paid by Souls Grown Deep Foundation.

June 2019

Hello, I'm Zachary Schr. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sam Doyle without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FiberTech (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for adding the paid editing templates to the pages you have edited. We might seem officious here at first, but rest assured that your contributions are appreciated. There is a "Wikipedia way" of doing things that can be off-putting at the start. Hang in there, we can always use subject editors like yourself. The many varied policies are what built Wikipedia. Also, feel free to reply on talk pages, as that is what they are for: talking!

RE: Sam Doyle, I located and added many sources. I didn't put back "self-taught" or "outsider", as I tend to agree with you that it's a marginalizing term and not really necessary for someone in so many notable museum collections. I did locate the fact that he dropped out of the Penn school in grade nine, so if someone did add back the "self-taught" term, it would be correct as grades school art education isn't very formative, and he did indeed seem to start his art career very late in life (in his 50s, If I recall the sources correctly). In any case, welcome aboard and do not hesitate to ask for editing help as we all edit collaboratively here. It's coincidental that you came along now, as it was only a few months ago that two other editors and I had an impromptu article creation drive that created many of the recent articles on Gee's Bend quilters! Your assistance in expanding them is most appreciated. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leroy Almon has been accepted

Leroy Almon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:31, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Burnside (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Burnside and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Burnside, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 20:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bgourgeot, I've pushed the article to article space. He is notable by virtue of WP:ARTIST 4)d: in multiple museum or notable gallery collections.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eldren Bailey has been accepted

Eldren Bailey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:17, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph Griffin

Hi! I passed by your contributions page to see what you were working on, as I had not noticed any articles from you recently. Ralph Griffin was a hair away from being ready, so I dropped a few edits in and pushed it to article space. Nice work! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~ Haha thanks!! I appreciate all of your help! I'm also working on articles for Archie Byron, Thornton Dial Jr., Richard Dial, and Arthur Dial. Lots going on.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Dial (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While I am not stating that the subject is not notable, there is no assertion that the topic is notable in the article. All that is stated is that they were a designer and sculptor. The assertion for notability is that they were famous for their metal works and furniture, but there is no reference to support this. Does not meet notability guidelines for creative professionals.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Dial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Dial, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes (talk) 03:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Archie Byron has been accepted

Archie Byron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 01:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

For creating Archie Byron. Keep up the good work! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~ Thanks! I appreciate it! :)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For your great contributions! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leroy Person has been accepted

Leroy Person, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 07:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Louis Light has been accepted

Joe Louis Light, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 04:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thornton Dial Jr. has been accepted

Thornton Dial Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Keep up your excellent work! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:11, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dilmus Hall has been accepted

Dilmus Hall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 23:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bulleted lists

Congrats on another terrific article! You have become a good editor. One tiny note: you should update your template to use bulleted lists (*) instead of numbered ones #. Let me know if you need any help!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC) ~~ Thanks! That's a helpful tip. I'll start doing that.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Dial has been accepted

Arthur Dial, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vernon Burwell concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vernon Burwell, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herbert Singleton has been accepted

Herbert Singleton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 22:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was pointed at your work and am impressed! Did you know that new articles can get extra attention when presented on the Main page in the DYK (Did you know ...?) section?. It's too late for this one, - "new" means a week, but for the next one, let's go for it. I'll watch Draft:Henry Speller and will nominate. Did you know that you could give your articles an infobox, such as Beethoven, to see some things at a glance? Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thank you! I would like to start including infoboxes, but I'm not sure how to upload photos of the artists. The organization that I work for owns the copyright of most of the photos of the artists, but Wikipedia won't allow me to upload them if they aren't mine, specifically. Any ideas?

@Bgourgeot: I think you could do this: ask your organization if they would agree to release medium or low resolution versions of the images you are talking about. I think your goal (and success) so far has been to create awareness of notable African-American artists by writing articles. Uploading images that are (freely licensed) would be a version of that goal. You would have to do some image editing work to reduce the resolution, then get in touch with WP:OTRS with some kind of proof that the images are freely released. AT at that point you could upload them, and the license would be confirmed by a tag indicating OTRS has the proof.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Sweet Brown Snail by Jason Rhoades and Paul McCarthy

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Thank you for all your edits and contributions this year.
Wishing you a happy holiday!
ThatMontrealIP (talk)

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Thank you!! Happy Solstice to y'all!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luster Willis has been accepted

Luster Willis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 05:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Speller has been accepted

Henry Speller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 12:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Lucas has been accepted

Charlie Lucas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leroy Almon, 1995.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leroy Almon, 1995.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eldren M Bailey with his sculptures in his front yard 1986.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eldren M Bailey with his sculptures in his front yard 1986.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Richard Dial concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Richard Dial, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Henry Speller

On 31 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Henry Speller, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the visual style of African-American artist Henry Speller, who was also an accomplished blues musician, was described as "blues aesthetic"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Speller. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Henry Speller), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

African American artists

Thank you for quality articles about African American artists from the North American South, such as Henry Speller, Joe Louis Light, Archie Byron, Eldren Bailey and Leroy Almon, for uploading images for them, for adding substantial "life and work" sections to some such as Mensie Lee Pettway, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2373 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Maxwell L Anderson 2019.jpg

Hello, Bgourgeot. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Maxwell L Anderson 2019.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:32, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Dial

Hello, Bgourgeot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Dial".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgourgeot: I hope you are doing well in these crazy times. I saw this notificaiton and had a look at Richard Dial. I added a few small things and it is now an article. Thank you! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:J.B. Murray has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:J.B. Murray. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 16:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jesse Aaron

Hello, Bgourgeot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jesse Aaron".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgourgeot: I hope you are well! I noticed this article was still in draft and pushed it to article space. Nice work! Possibly (talk) 08:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:JImmy Lee Sudduth.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JImmy Lee Sudduth.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sudduth Dog Painting.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sudduth Dog Painting.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 08:39, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]