User talk:Bethbcpr

Welcome

Hello, Bethbcpr, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (talk) 04:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information about our conflict of interest policy

Hello, if the last two letters of your username are a reference to the fact that you work in the field of public relations, please note:

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Active Banana (talk) 04:10, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The Okee Dokee Brothers, Justin Lansing (l) and Joe Mailander (r).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Okee Dokee Brothers, Justin Lansing (l) and Joe Mailander (r).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 02:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamee Ranta (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamee Ranta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamee Ranta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 06:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bethbcpr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 06:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have made several edits to add references and updates to this article. I hope it passes muster now! Bethbcpr (talk) 22:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Muhandes. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Holy (Justin Bieber song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 10:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I know these artists, who have asked me to update their pages. I will disclose this personal connection if you think it's a conflict, but these are just factual updates, and I'm just learning how to add references to factual information on this one. Bethbcpr (talk) 22:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jamee Ranta has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jamee Ranta. Thanks! JSFarman (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, JS.I will seek out and share that reference ASAP. _Beth Bethbcpr (talk) 23:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 23:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated, Jeff!!! I'm trying to learn. Bethbcpr (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bethbcpr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bethbcpr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bethbcpr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Jeff G. ツ 23:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff thank you for the information. I am doing these as favors to the artist, so does that mean a conflict of interest? I'm trying to learn Wikipedia. Bethbcpr (talk) 23:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know the artists? Are you working on behalf of a PR firm? — Jeff G. ツ 09:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff other members of a firm I am working with are working with Colin. I will suggest that his office just send over suggested edits. You can reject the changes I made. Bethbcpr (talk) 20:35, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ 20:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hi Beth, can you please respond to the question first asked above a number of years ago as to whether you have a conflict of interest with any of the articles you have edited, and also whether you are editing in the course of your work? If you are, you need to properly disclose this as required by the terms of use. Thank you Melcous (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) Hi, Melcous: I've resubmitted Colin Tilley's updates. He has asked me to add these updates. I've tried to add only factual informatin about his newer work and awards, along with relevant media references for fact-checking. Bethbcpr (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bethbcpr thanks for your reply, and thanks for using the Template:Edit request which is absolutely the best thing to do when you have a conflict of interest (which yes, if you are editing at the request of the subject of the article, you definitely do). You are also asked to disclose this - easily done on your user page. And again please note that if you are receiving compensation for editing or editing in the course of your job, (e.g. you work in PR for these people as your username implies) then this is a requirement of the terms of use you signed up to when you created your account here). You can read how to do this here: WP:PCD, or you can ask questions here and other editors including myself will try to help you! Thank you, Melcous (talk) 22:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colin Tilley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halsey. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Seabrook (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see the notability guidelines for creative professionals. Sources are largely interviews which do not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ian Seabrook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ian Seabrook, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamee Ranta (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamee Ranta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamee Ranta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 19:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Seabrook has been accepted

Ian Seabrook, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Bethbcpr (talk) 15:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jamee Ranta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamee Ranta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamee Ranta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 11:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the subject of the article is worthy of at least a brief article. Her work with some of the top artists in pop music is noteworthy, as is her GRAMMY nomination. Another contributor added new references from established media outlets. I think the other text has been simplified, and unverified facts were removed. Please reconsider leaving this article up, or please recommend how to edit it so that the information is acceptable. Bethbcpr (talk)BethBC Bethbcpr (talk) 22:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bethbcpr: How goes it. I might be worth commenting on the actual Afd discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamee Ranta. Please follow the WP:AFD instructions. Remember it is not a vote, it is a discussion. scope_creep^Talk 22:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]