User talk:Avraham/Archive 22

This is an archive of past discussions with Avraham. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 21

Archive 22

Archive 23 >

All Pages:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 - 55 - 56 - 57 - 58 - 59 - 60 - ... (up to 100)

Yiddish help requested

I know you have at least some Yiddish. Could you take a look at Talk:Cluj-Napoca#Etymology and possibly weigh in on the Yiddish orthography and transliteration? Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 22:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks

Thanks!

So, yeah, you know how these work... »»»»
Thank you very much for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with a final tally of (75/1/0). Your trust in me is greatly appreciated, and I can assure you it has not been misplaced. I shall use these tools to the best of my ability, and will do my best not to let you down. Thank you once again, and happy editing as always! *Hersfold* ^(t/a/c) 20:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, really

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

They call them croissants

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which I'm very glad to say was successful at 81/7/0. Some of the very best that Wikipedia has to offer came out to support or oppose me and the kind words from all the editors has really given me confidence to be an admin and I can't wait to start. I will take the advice of the opposes and not jump into any content disputes immediately. As well, I will try to add more content myself. Anyways, in thanks for participating in my RfA, I've made you this French pastry. Enjoy! --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 14:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

I have an OTRS ticket in Hebrew [1] for an image licensing release. Would you mind looking at it? Thanks. howcheng {chat} 17:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my RFA

Thank you!

Thank you for your support in my RFA. The passed with a final count of (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta ^Sing 18:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilad Atzmon

I read your messege on the Project Judaism talk page [[2]], but see no antisemitism template on the article. I would be willing to return it to the article, but if there is in support from others, it would probably not last more than a few minutes. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 18:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Apologies - I got overly annoyed at Jay's childish game-playing (as usual, he's being obnoxious). I've reverted my comments. Thanks for adding the AfD to the noticeboards, I hadn't realised that you had a standing practice of doing that. (Why Judaism though? It doesn't seem to have much relevance to that unless you're arguing that anything to do with Israel is automatically relevant to Judaism.) -- ChrisO (talk) 23:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pipes

Avi! Do read the link. Pipes himself says this is a notable misquote, he quotes the places where its reported - originally the Washington Middle East Report, and then CAIR and the like, which I'd prefer not to link to - and then denies it. I'm not sure what your objection is. He quotes the misquote (!) in its entirety. Relata refero (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I agree with you on CAIR/CAMERA, of course. I was talking of your recent reverts on Daniel Pipes and the associated edit comments. Relata refero (talk) 07:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of the current 1535 edits on Daniel Pipes I seem not to have even a single one. Perhaps you are confusing me with User:Avruch (again

) -- Avi (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know that I was on my way here to own up! Relata refero (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't imagine why I go on doing that. Perhaps because I know an Avruch I call Avi... Sigh. Well, mea culpa. Relata refero (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

. Twenty-five lashes with a limp noodle. -- Avi (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, believe me the next one will pass. The number of "Thanks for voting" boxes on this talkpage will see to that! Relata refero (talk) 12:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Range block

Hello Avi! I've just made a range block after using the range block calculator but I just wanted to check with you that I did it correctly ? Thank you! :) Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 23:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again...here I am asking for yet more help :). I've just performed a username block; have I done this correctly? [3] Thank-you :) Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 14:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messianic Jews

It's in the right general section, but what I meant was that it's not in the right part of that section. So I moved the citation (which cited with a website that listed arguments against Jesus as messiah) to the part above that mentions that particular objection. It was a bit disorganized before. Better?Gator (talk) 01:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASardanaphalus&diff=200522398&oldid=200522138

Sardanaphalus (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I really appreciate it! :) [4]. That's about the fifth time I've seen this one this week. Can you think of any way we can prevent that? (blacklisting, etc?) SQL ^{Query me!} 15:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advise

Hi, I notice that you recently made some 'reverts' to the Assemblies_of_God page, and that you are an administrator. I make occassional updates and improvements to the page and have noticed that recently there has been a lot of updates from unsigned and possible SockPuppet authors. Many of the edits are aimed at adding a section on Scandals to the page.

I'm not fully sure what the procedure is, but would it be possible to Semi-Protect this page from unsigned and sock puppet contributions.

As I have mentioned in the discussion section on the page, the information that keeps being added is already available on Wikipedia in a section on such scandals. Personally, it appears that the authors/editors in question seem to have an anti-Assembly of God agenda. Although there is merit in their views, I feel it is not appropriate on the main encyclopedia entry page for the organisation.

Although I am member of an AOG church in the UK, I have no problem in having our faults publicised, however, I would like to see it done in a fair and unbiased manner, such as would be expected for any other organisation from the Scouts to DNC.

I look forward to your input. Regards Paul Paulrach (talk) 17:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A request

Please do not remove my words from discussions, whether they be AfDs, my own talk pages, or whatever. I have reverted your removals in both cases. I welcome you to reuse your words to consolidate the discussion as you feel appropriate but I would appreciate not having my words removed. Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 21:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge-Response

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
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==
=ywm4
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----