User talk:AstuteFlicker

Your thread has been archived

Hello AstuteFlicker! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Doubt, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello AstuteFlicker! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Query, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bhairava7 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need to more references for Verification and please add more information. Thank you

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 07:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AstuteFlicker! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 07:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello AstuteFlicker! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Merging a Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ajay Kumar Jha

Hello, AstuteFlicker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ajay Kumar Jha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AstuteFlicker. Thank you for your work on Pali, Darbhanga. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please add a ref for the population from the official indian census site

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:16, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Makhana Board of Bihar

Hello AstuteFlicker,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Makhana Board of Bihar for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Makhana Board of Bihar to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ROY is WAR Talk! 13:13, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]