User talk:Article123456
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Article123456, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Aboutmovies (talk) 06:15, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Chevymontecarlo - alt 08:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Akhtaboot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- blatantly self-promotional with no acceptable version to revert to.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kilopi (talk) 02:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- I have responded to your question about this at [1]. DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- I did some further editing. You continue to overuse the name of the company, and to write in a non-encyclopedic manner with short choppy list-style paragraphs. I've improved both aspects, and it's as good as I can make it. I consider notability dubious, but this would need a community decision. No reason not to move it into mainspace and it will take its chances. DGG ( talk ) 00:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help. I moved it to the mainspace.--Article123456 (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akhtaboot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhtaboot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 14:13, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Explanation
[edit]Ido not know whether Akhtaboot will or will not be considered notable by the community. they make the decision, not I. I could only delete it myself if I thought the article was hopelessly promotional or if it made no claim of importance at all. Since I try to see how much I can improve a basically promotional article, I improved it as much as I could. As I have worked on it to this extent, it's up to other people to judge. I said earlier that it would have to take its chances, DGG ( talk ) 19:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation--Article123456 (talk) 05:48, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akhtaboot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhtaboot (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 19:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)