User talk:Andvd

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Content management system has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 12:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was my first ever edit and I made a mistake while editing.Andvd (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

Warm Welcome

Thanks for your welcome to Wiki! Emrgmgmtca (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to thank you, too! Thanks for the welcome to wiki, although i know a few things from the german wiki already, which i don't like as much as the englisch version. :D Thanks again! Krempel (talk) 13:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another Warm Welcome

Thanks also for your welcome to Wiki!

Do know how can I edit pages which have being semi/partially locked? No problem I found it here;

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:User_access_levels#Autoconfirmed_users

"4 days old and have made at least 10 edits are considered autoconfirmed" ; so will have to just wait a few more days

Thanks,

Richard

Richardbrucebaxter (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for your help on the Négrette article. :)

Welcome!

Hello, Andvd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:

Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

– Luna Santin (talk) 05:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the encouragement. Andvd (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Erode, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TestEditBot (talk) 08:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Undid the change made by TestBot. Andvd (talk) 09:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

And I undid you. Look at your edit here. You added an example image. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 09:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edited again, but more careful this time. Andvd (talk) 09:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

Hi
Just a quick note, if you help fighting vandalism, please make sure that you undo all the vandals changes. With the two edits [1] and [2] you only caught the latest, but missed one that was made by the same person directly before. If that happens, people who also noticed the vandalism will usually assume that everything has been fixed and move on.
The easiest way is usually to check the page history, compare the current article with old revisions until you find a clean one, then edit that old revision and save it (it will warn you that you are editing an old revision).
Thanks for helping, and Cheers, --Amalthea^Talk 12:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Hi Andvd,

Thank you for the message. I'm really sorry. I reverted all the recent vandalisms but, as that the way the rollback feature works and them were edits in a row by the same IP, I had not the time to read all the article to find the another one that you found; as you can see, it were older than a week and another user seems to reverted oldest vandalisms before the IP that I reverted. Have you another tool to revert older edits? or maybe a way to find older vandalisms in the edits history? I'm interested to do a more profitable work.

Best regards, --Baiji (talk) 08:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

for the welcome. It's so nice to have a formal welcome, otherwise you feel sort lost and overlooked. Captain picard's bald head (talk) 10:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same was done for me. Btw am I addressing you or am I addressing Captain Picard's bald head? ha ha! Andvd (talk) 10:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

Links to MySpace, facebook etc

Hi in updating Evan Davis (actor) I noticed Wikipedia doesn't allow MySpace or Facebook, however there are links to those sites on the Tom Hanks and Kevin Smith page. Is there a way to link MySpace or Facebook appropriatly? Thank you. GoldenMonkey78 (talk) 10:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does allow links to MySpace/ Facebook etc. However these links usually point to information that cannot be verified and/or written by the same person itself. Your links were removed by an automted Bot which probably searches for all new links to certain sites and deletes them. If you carefully read what the Bot has written on your talk page, you will find "If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert". Andvd (talk) 10:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

So if you are sure that the links you are providing enhance the quality of your article then go ahead and re-add them. Remember Bots are not as intelligent as us humans and are used for repetitive tasks. Andvd (talk) 10:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

Deleted Info :(

I am trying to load information regarding Louise Brill from the Fast Show, and someone has taken the information rudely questioning who she is. Louise was on the Fast Show series 2, 3 and 4 she did the 'Live Show' at Hammersmith Apollo, the Christmas Special, and the Fast Show 'Ted and Ralph film. Brill was also in the Holsten Pils commercial featuring the cast of the Fast Show, How am I to add information for this person if it is to be so easily deleted? Please help! (BRODYJ (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

No new user to Wikipedia should be treated rudely. Was any rude message posted to your talk page?

A feature of Wikipedia is that it is so easy to delete information. This is very useful when countering vandals. However, unimportant information will also be deleted. It looks like this has happened to your article since I cannot find it. Was the article deleted entirely or just the content? Was any message posted to your talk page warning you about potential deletion? Andvd (talk) 09:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

I added information on the 'where are they now' section of the Fast Show page. The whole article was deleted. no message was posted on my talk page. I am trying to put together a whole page on the actress to have included on the site - but I am concerned that the whole work will be deleted, which, with all the work it would take - is a little disheartening. I see someone has already requested a page to be written on Louise Brill, would it be possible to add contributions to this page once it is set up?

Thankyou for you help :) BRODYJ (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

. . . for the tip on my talk page. I try to leave a link, but you must have seen one of the times I forgot! Please let me know if you see anything else that will improve my editing. Movingboxes (talk) 07:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

use of the db-nonsense tag

Hey Andvd,

Thanks for the advice, but i'd like to know what difference it makes whether the Speedy Deletion Tag is one of "nonsense" or "vandalism", if the recently created article is clearly just a load of baloney which will be deleted anyway? Cheers! --Fatal!ty ^(T☠LK) 08:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the simple reason that it allows the author of the article to know why the article is nominated for deletion. The author can then respond appropriately on the discussion page after placing a hangon message. If a new user starts an article about a group you have never heard of, you would mark it as db-nonsense, instead of db-club. Any new user would then get confused as to why the article is considered as nonsense when it is written so well. Andvd (talk) 12:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Andvd,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Andvd! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Andvd,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]