Jump to content

User talk:Anagarcia2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana Qeblawi (January 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It is unclear if she is notable or not – the text is unambiguously promotional which makes it look like she is not notable, and several of the sources don't verify the information. However, with a thorough revision of the text, removal of unsourced information and irrelevant/inappropriate sources such as her own cosmetics sales website, and addition of sources that do meet these criteria, it might become a viable article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 11:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Anagarcia2000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 11:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana Qeblawi (January 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Baqi:) (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mike Sy

[edit]

Hi Anagarcia2000, were you hired to create Draft:Mike Sy? I'm asking because you disclosed your paid status with regard to Draft:Diana Qeblawi, so perhaps you simply forgot to disclose it wrt Mike Sy? Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 13:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am hired to, i am not sure shall i just edit his name? into paid section just beside diana? or shall i put a different statement? Anagarcia2000 (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Sy (January 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No claim to notability in the draft, and the Articles for Deletion discussion about Sy concluded that he is not notable – that was the day before yesterday!
bonadea contributions talk 13:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Bonadea,
I have no idea before now i have read in deletion log, can't you see? they have nominate it for deletion when someone has uploaded Arabic version into Wikipedia en, that discussion was useless than, Kindly re-investigate it, all links are notable and from legit sources. It would be highly appreciated if you can check & provide me any suggestion in order to edit and make it more appropriate. Anagarcia2000 (talk) 10:45, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, @Anagarcia2000. I'm not sure what you mean by "all links are notable", but I will observe that being "legit" is not enough. The sources you use to establish notability must each meet all three of the criteria in WP:42: being reliable (which is not necessarily the same as "legit" - see WP:RS), wholly independent of Sy, and containing significant coverage of him. I have not looked at your sources, but the reviewer has concluded that they do not meet these conditions. ColinFine (talk) 14:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually @ColinFine,
Sources are reliable, Containing significant coverage and independent of Sy. previously reviewers had discussion on deletion, Nomination of deletion was imposed when someone has mistakenly uploaded Arabic draft to Wikipedia En, and on behalf of that they discuss and delete the draft, who was working on that draft was having COI issues as well, so everything mixed up. I want reviewers to check it neutrally this time and identify mistakes so i can proceed accordingly. Anagarcia2000 (talk) 08:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]

Stop icon You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

very well noted, Thanks for the update at the moment i have to remove promotional language and have to check thoroughly notable links once again for the same draft. Anagarcia2000 (talk) 08:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anagarcia2000&oldid=1271492999"