User talk:Amin Beqiri

Welcome!

Hi Amin Beqiri! I noticed [[Special:Contributions/Amin Beqiri| Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. ]] and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:06, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Originally i was editing before i log in which i was the same person that im editing wikipedia, as an ip user, i decided to login to make further edits Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's also nice not having your IP address advertised with each edit... ;) - Adolphus79 (talk)

January 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Temple Run, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 19:21, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Temple Run. Bbb23 (talk) 19:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not get incorrect information, i was correcting the date since in websites it was released on august 4, 2011 Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per the source, the date was August 3, 2011. Do you have another source that contradicts the cited source?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want a yes or a no. Please provide the source here.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:35, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In temople run wiki on released date section, it says august 4, 2011 Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand you correctly, wikis are not considered reliable sources on Wikipedia. In any event, I want the URL of the source, not a description of it.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is: https://templerun.fandom.com/wiki/Temple_Run Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:39, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That page does not exist, but Fandom websites are not a reliable source.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But the release date says august 4 2011 Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are not listening. All material in Wikipedia has to be supported by reliable sources. Your say-so or a claim at some wiki is not good enough. Unless you can find a reliable source, I strong suggest you revert back to August 3, which is supported by a reliable source. You are also way too inexperienced to be putting up this much of a battle. It doesn't bode well for your future here as an editor.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Too much, well why? Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done here for the moment because you're obviously not interested in learning how to edit constructively here. Did you have any sanctions against you when you edited as an IP?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:48, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but many edits were reverted Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think i have edited in november 2024 Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are Special:contributions/92.53.21.0/24 your IPs?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not edit disruptively Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:45, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I count at least 3 reverts in a short period of time at Temple Run which runs afoul of our WP:3RR rule and is disruptive. Please heed the warnings provided here, and use the article's talk page to discuss. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. i have to make test edits in wikipedia sandbox Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This has nothing to do with test edits. This is you actively reverting other editors repeatedly without engaging in discussion to gain concensus. Please read the policies provided. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Amin Beqiri (talk) 19:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amin Beqiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know i got blocked from editing for making disruptive edits, i just want to get unblocked, i was just here to improve wikipedia and not make any disruptive edits, this time im not editing disruptively on wikipedia. I have to get unblocked and welcome to make useful contributions.

Decline reason:

No, this is not why this account was blocked. The reason for the block is clearly stated above. Yamla (talk) 17:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you continue vandalising this page, you will lose talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 18:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]