Jump to content

User talk:Americus55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Category:People of Alsatian-Jewish descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Socomj (talk) 00:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:William Colby.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:William Colby.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improper moves

[edit]

Do not move pages and then make requests for the redirects to be moved (like you did with Tom Mooney). That just makes you look like an ass and will hurt your cause. You also did not follow the steps at WP:RM (see the part about setting up a discussion area). TJ Spyke 21:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop with the images

[edit]

Hey, all those images you just uploaded for PA state reps and senators? ALL copyright violations. Every single one. Not one is OK to use. You need to read this: Wikipedia:Copyrights immediately. Consider this your last and final warning. --A. Gorilla (talk) 21:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, all that work you up in to uploading those images: for nothing. I just nominated them for deletion, because they are copyright violations and cannot ever be on wikipedia. Basically, these are copyrighted by the Pennsylvania government, which means the government owns them. You can't use this tag on these images:{{PD-USGov}}, because the US government is not the same as the Pennsylvania government.
If you want to make a good faith effort to contribute to Wikipedia, I can help you. But, first, you must stop uploading any images. If you do that, I can show you how to upload images that won't run afoul of copyright law. --A. Gorilla (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Andy Dinniman.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andy Dinniman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Don Siegelman.jpg)

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Don Siegelman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --auburnpilot talk 02:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:H. Guy Hunt.jpg

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:H. Guy Hunt.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --auburnpilot talk 02:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Leon Panetta headshot.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Leon Panetta headshot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Leon Panetta headshot.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Leon Panetta headshot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Daugaard.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daugaard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 11:43, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Phil Bryant.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Phil Bryant.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.35.224 (talk) 02:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phil Bryant.jpg again

[edit]

It's obvious from all of the traffic above, that you don't grasp the copyright policy of Wikipedia. Since you can't, I'd suggest you just stop uploading any files to Wikipedia. File:Phil Bryant.jpg is from a State of Mississippi web site, which is copyrighted and owned by the state of Mississippi. You can't just take copyrighted content from other web sites and upload them here. As far as government sites go, only content found at federal government web sites is generally copyright-free and may be uploaded here. As this is like your umpteenth time being told about this, if you upload another copyrighted image to Wikipedia again, I'm almost sure your editing privileges will be revoked via a block or ban. -    allstarecho     05:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ronald Gene Simmons.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Ronald Gene Simmons.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ronald Gene Simmons.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.


Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Gov. John Baldacci - August 18, 2007.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Gov. John Baldacci - August 18, 2007.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Gov. John Baldacci - August 18, 2007.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Fair use rationale for File:Patrick Tracy Burris mug shot.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Patrick Tracy Burris mug shot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 02:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Basket of Puppies 04:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated James Randall (serial killer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Randall (serial killer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Durova319 05:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:RalphRoe.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RalphRoe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KS cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bhall87Four Scoreand Seven 04:33, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Winona Ryder. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg (talk) 03:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What would that "defamatory" content be? The article says she was "convicted of grand theft and vandalism." Do those categories not fit? Don't threaten me with blockage when I haven't done anything wrong. Americus55 (talk) 03:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To begin with, you added the unsourced and potentially defamatory category "Groupies" to the article: [1]. Also, the "Vandals" category is a bizarre one, that appears to be mostly used for people infamous for vandalism; the Ryder article doesn't make it clear what "vandalism" she might have done, even if she was convicted of it. Court rulings can be confusing, and BLP means we don't make judgments about them unless a preponderance of reliable sources do. Convicted of theft? Yes. Vandal? No. Jayjg (talk) 03:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Americus55. You have new messages at Jayjg's talk page.
Message added 01:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jayjg (talk) 01:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Americus55. You have new messages at Jayjg's talk page.
Message added 03:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jayjg (talk) 03:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carl C. Perkins

[edit]

I have removed material from Carl C. Perkins that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 18:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion needed!

[edit]

As a frequent editor of American politics, I would appreciate if you put your two cents into the debate over the conservative support for President Obama in Talk:Public image of Barack Obama. Thanks.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to the Babette Josephs page disturbs me. Without it the page is clearly a stub, with minimal information. Thus the page seems to fall within the category Wikipedia:NPF "Wikipedia contains biographical material on people who, while notable enough for an entry, are not generally well known." That is, if she were better known, surely there would be more information about her.

We are thus instructed "In such cases, exercise restraint and include only material relevant to their notability, focusing on high quality secondary sources." She has been a politician for 25 years; there is 25 years of information that is more notable than what you have posted. That the article instead reflects only what is too easily described as an attack, argues strongly that your post is not appropriate under Wikipedia:NPF. Please remove your edits. Quantling (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Carrie Fisher, Joely Fisher, and Tricia Leigh Fisher. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg (talk) 01:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Americus55! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Jim Cawley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deaths in 2010, you may be blocked from editing.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hadden Clark.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hadden Clark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Norman Sisisky, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to John Miller (Washington politician). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 20:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to George J. Mitchell, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 19:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 01:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Durkee–Mower, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 21:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. Thank you for your contributions. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 21:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of House members reprimanded

[edit]

This is just a heads-up that I have removed your entry for Rep. Corinne Brown of Florida from List of United States Representatives expelled, censured, or reprimanded. Please see my comment on the talkpage of the article for my reasoning. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating an entry for Glenn Miller in this list. I had decided to leave it to someone else to do so, as his inclusion may be open to challenge on the basis that he was formally posted as "Missing in action" (so, including him might raise the issue of whether all other notable MIA aviators shouldn't be included in the list as well, which would make it excessively long - I think.) Personally, I am quite happy to accept your judgement that Miller should be included, since he was only a "combattant" in the technical sense and there is no evidence that his death resulted from enemy action (although a type of "friendly fire" incident is a possibility.) I thought I should note here that someone else might challenge his inclusion on the basis of the policy that is stated in the introduction to the list (or look for a change or qualification to that policy.) Thanks again, though, for taking the effort to complete an entry in the list for him. Todowd (talk) 17:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

City mayors by state templates

[edit]

I see you have created Template:Washington cities and mayors of 100,000 population. The first deletion discussion for this type of template is occurring at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_24#Template:New_York_cities_and_mayors_of_100.2C000_population.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you previously created Template:KS cities and mayors of 100,000 population, that seems to have gotten [Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_March_12#Template:KS_cities_and_mayors_of_100.2C000_population|deleted]]. We need to put an end to this. You are the only active creator of these types of templates who has not responded at the current discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
These templates are up for deletion again at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_February_19#Template:Massachusetts_cities_and_mayors_of_100.2C000_population.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Falcon8765 (TALK) 22:48, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

Thanks for the barnstar! --Boycool (talk) 00:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

[edit]
A Barnstar!
A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.0.137 (talk) 13:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edmund Kemper.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edmund Kemper.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:26, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Freed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Newmanoconnor (talk) 20:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ron Barber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lois Frankel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allen West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Americus55

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Brainy J ~~ (talk) 18:44, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John C. Breckinridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Guthrie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Saudi Arabian rapists

[edit]

Category:Saudi Arabian rapists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

United States Congress members who died in office Article

[edit]

Thank you for your recent efforts to expand the United States Congress members who died in office article. I was wondering if you happened to read my comments on the article's Talk page regarding the need to expand the article. --TommyBoy (talk) 22:18, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pat Swindall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adele Khoury Graham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scotch-Irish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:USCongRep/AZ/95, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boy Seeks Girl Tonight (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Providing edit summaries

[edit]

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! SJ Morg (talk) 09:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I see that, despite the above message, you are still not using edit summaries. Please do so. It can at times be difficult to see what an editor is doing if there are no edit summaries, which can lead at best to waste of time for other editors, and sometimes even to misunderstandings which can lead to significant problems. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Americus55!

[edit]

20th Knesset

[edit]

Hello Americus55. Just to let you know, the 20th Knesset doesn't come into existence until it's sworn in at the end of the month, so best not to add it to people's bios (there have been cases of people dropping out after elections and not becoming MKs). Cheers, Number 57 18:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speakers in Chairmen boxes

[edit]

It's completely irrelevant who the Speaker or Speakers were in infoboxes detailing committee chairmanships. Tiller54 (talk) 11:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I can see that you did a lot of work adding the Speaker to so many infoboxes, and that you meant it in good faith, but I would request you to go back and remove them. In the future it would be a good idea, before making so many changes in so many articles, to discuss it somewhere and get consensus. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Never mind removing them, I see that someone has already done so. Please don't be offended by this, but please do keep it in mind before doing something like this again. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Cooper (U.S. Senator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bots

[edit]


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buddy Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Watson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ammodramus (talk) 10:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

[edit]

Thanks for the copyediting on Murder of Reyna Marroquin. Geeky Randy (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Political party strength in Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Thank you for noticing and thanking me for my edit! You taking the time to notice and thank me for my small edit really made me feel great and it makes me want to continue to contribute more to wikipedia. Thank you! Vissequ (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]

Although I have already thanked you for some of your individual edits, I wanted to express my appreciation for your assistance in expanding Category:People associated with the assassination of Abraham Lincoln which I recently created.--TommyBoy (talk) 02:36, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per your suggestion, I have formally that Category:Lincoln conspirators should be upmerged into Category:People associated with the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.--TommyBoy (talk) 04:37, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Following up on my earlier comments, I'm beginning to think that the discussion on the nomination has gone off track, and I was wondering if you any further suggestions.--TommyBoy (talk) 23:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African-American people in Alaska politics and Category:African-American state legislators in Alaska

[edit]

Are you going to do anything to actually expand the coverage of the topics covered by these categories, and if so, do you need any help with that? As I've explained any number of times, I have no use for exploiting the WP:SMALLCAT loophole to create an ceaseless number of vanity categories, which is precisely what you get when you create two categories to support only one article. Expand that times the countless number of times this loophole has been exploited over the years and the category structure ceases to become useful to anyone other than categorization geeks when there's no logic, rhyme or reason being employed other than slavish devotion to a particular finer point in policy / guidelines. Efforts like this amount to picking low-hanging fruit and activity for activity's sake, without an appreciable improvement in our coverage of what's notable in the world. This is especially pertinent considering that right this moment in Alaska, we have reliable sources making a big deal out of an African-American politician who is also a presumptive state senator-elect because he's unopposed on the general election ballot. Curiously enough, one such recent story was the top story in the physical edition of the Alaska Dispatch News the other day, which put much focus on his race, but now it appears that they're trying to bury it as much as possible after readers objected to their making such a big deal of his being African-American. The number of notable African-Americans in Alaskan politics could adequately populate one category, but not both. There were African-Americans such as Rosalee Walker and Iola Banks who were active on the local and party levels and may therefore have some claim to notability, but never held particular offices, which some Wikipedians who work on political biographies appear to view as the sole determinant for notability. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 22:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Isaac Trimble Preston) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Isaac Trimble Preston, Americus55!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added some tags on the talk page and added two more citations from Google Books (using the citation generator. Hope that's OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Edits to List of Hispanic and Latino Americans in the United States Congress

[edit]

I wanted to explain the reasons why I undid your edits of this morning; I did it not because they are wrong, but because they are premature. The new members of Congress first elected on November 8 will not commence to serve as Senators or Representatives until noon on January 3, 2017 (except for a few instances in which they won special elections for the remainder of the term that concludes on January 3, but none of such new members of Congress are Hispanic or Latino). For this reason, I undid your edits to the List of Hispanic and Latino Americans in the United States Congress page.

I also undid your edits that stated that the Hispanic Representatives that did not seek reelection will have served until 2017); I certainly hope that is the case, but if they were to resign or die prior to January 1 then their service would have lasted until 2016, and if they resign or die on January 1 or 2 then their reason for departure would not have been "retirement." There is no reason to tempt fate by assuming that they all will serve until they retire on January 3, 2017.

I think that you had some edits regarding the party affiliation and party color designations for current or past members; please feel free to add those back in, since I did not mean to undo them, but they went out with the bathwater when I undid the premature additions and modifications. And please come back on January 3 to make your additions and modifications to the list; when you do, you also should include Congressman-elect Brian Mast of Florida, who, like Senator-elect Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, has one Mexican-American parent and two Mexican grandparents (albeit on his mother's side instead of on her father's side).

Thank you. AuH2ORepublican (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Americus55. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://leg.mt.gov/css/About-the-Legislature/Facts-and-Statistics/leadership-through-history.asp, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as United States House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Roswell, Idaho) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Roswell, Idaho, Americus55!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've linked from the preexisting Wikimedia Commons category and put a tag on the talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 00:17, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve George A. Williams (Nebraska politician)

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Americus55, thanks for creating George A. Williams (Nebraska politician)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 1 issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

[edit]

Thanks for creating the basic articles about WV Senators, but could you please add talk pages? Thanks! MB298 (talk) 22:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jeff Mullins (politician)

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Americus55, thanks for creating Jeff Mullins (politician)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. All articles on living people are required to have WP:INLINECITED secondary sources. At the moment it has no sources ('External links' are usually friendly suggestions rather than sources, but I've assumed this was an error and they are sources, otherwise it would be tagged for deletion as an unreferenced biography of a living person). Can you please inline cite the sources and put a 'References' header.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 13:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see now this is sorted, which is brilliant. There is the same issue at Mike Romano (politician), could you please fix it? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

All articles need sources or references - not necessarily external links, which are usually just friendly suggestions. For living people (and preferably for all articles), references should be WP:INLINECITED - this is a requirement for biographies of living people. I contacted you above, but Mike Romano (politician) remains without a clear source, and you have created more articles the same, such as Tom Takubo, since. Please stop. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Greg Boso, Glenn Jeffries, Mike Azinger, Mike Maroney, Robert L. Karnes, Ed Gaunch, Chandler Swope. Boleyn (talk) 20:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Americus55. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Could you please take a look at the article about Johannes Brost. I would just like someone else to take a look at my complete re-write.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of Alsatian-Jewish descent has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:People of Alsatian-Jewish descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 22:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Political Party Strength in Mississippi fix

[edit]

Hi Americus55! I have recently attempted to make a fix on the Political Party Strength in Mississippi page but am unable to get what I have added to align properly with the intended column. I was attempting to update the composition of the Mississippi Senate, as I noticed that a 2017 special election changed the balance from 32 Republicans and 20 Democrats to 33 Republicans and 19 Democrats. When I added this on, it created another column beside the presidential results. I noticed you were the last person to edit this page and would really appreciate it if you could correct the page. If you could, that would be great! Thanks! Count Awesome (talk) 21:31, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Americus55. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Americus55. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Commissioners of the International Joint Commission, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:55, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no, I'm not joking

[edit]

Which is exactly why I provided a link to the relevant editing guideline on the subject. Since you apparently couldn't be othered to read it before blindly reverting me I suppose I can reproduce the relvant passage here for you:

"There is usually nothing wrong with linking to redirects in articles. Some editors are tempted, upon finding a link to a redirect page, to bypass the redirect and point the link directly at the target page. However, changing to a piped link is beneficial only in a few cases. Piping links solely to avoid redirects is generally a time-wasting exercise that can actually be detrimental. It is almost never helpful to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]]."

  • emphasis added

I hope that clears it up for you. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:52, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anthony Lawrence (judge) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://courts.ms.gov/appellatecourts/coa/bios/judgeLawrence.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:26, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domenico, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Domenico Pellegrini, Domenico Gnoli and Domenico Rossi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Americus55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Commissioners of the International Joint Commission".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:27, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Presidents of Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Emilytaftdouglas.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Homewood Cemetery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westinghouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Fort Smith, Arkansas, by occupation, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 15:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Raymond P. Shafer.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raymond P. Shafer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suicides by jumping in New York City has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Suicides by jumping in New York City has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Washington cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kansas cities and mayors of 100,000 population has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Louisville Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Louisville Barnstar
Belated thank you for creating List of members of the Louisville Metro Council, which has become a valuable resource in the orbit of Louisville, Kentucky. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 23:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]