User talk:Ambolio

July 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Simpsons Movie has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Simpsons Movie was changed by Ambolio (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870391 on 2018-07-18T15:08:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Sergecross73 msg me 11:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of Yoshi video games, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. TarkusAB^talk 15:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of Yoshi video games. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. TarkusAB^talk 18:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of Yoshi video games, you may be blocked from editing. TarkusAB^talk 19:20, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account is blocked for 3 days.

I'm pretty sure you're responsible for making the anonymous IP edits that got the Yoshi article page protected. If true, that means you're breaking our edit warring policy, and editing under multiple names/IPs, which is not allowed.
Even if you're not any of those IPs, you're making all sorts of inappropriate edits. You need to write Wikipedia according to what sources say. And you need to provide sources. Edits like this are entirely unnaccepable - there's no sources, its filled with errors, and its poorly written - and the fact that you continue to re-add edits like this all over the website is causing a lot of work for other editors to clean up.

If you return after your block, please slow down, put more care into your edits, add sources, and don't edit war. If you are caught editing under other names or IPs during your block, your block length will be extended, as that is against the rules as well. Sergecross73 msg me 19:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Poochy (Yoshi Character)

Hello, Ambolio. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Poochy (Yoshi Character), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 16:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Poochy (Yoshi Character)

Hello, Ambolio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poochy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]