User talk:Aldernodules

Welcome

Hello, Aldernodules, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Monty ₈₄₅ 16:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrollers

New page patrollers, please go easy on me! I seem to have suffered from some over-enthusiastic ones. Quotations from http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol

"Throughout the entire process of new pages patrol, it is important to remember not to bite the newbies." "a pointer or two of feedback about how they can make their contributions even better" "Be hesitant to list articles on Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion if there's a chance they could be improved and made into a meaningful article. Tag them for cleanup instead. Try not to step on people's toes. Users will often start an article as the briefest of stubs, and then expand it over the following hours or days."

Abraham Dawson

Now improved Bashereyre (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything as before

Two on the site instead of one!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waterford Charter Roll (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oo7565 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waterford Charter Roll and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oo7565 (talk) 06:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Oo7565 (talk) 06:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(thankyou, but my name is not Teahouse) Aldernodules (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Waterford Charter Roll has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Waterford Charter Roll. Thanks! Rankersbo (talk) 08:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waterford Charter Roll has been accepted

Waterford Charter Roll, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 20:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Waterford Charter Roll

I've cleaned up the citations per our normal method of using citation templates WP:FURG but you could add page numbers to citations 2 & 3. Interesting topic and nice job but could do with an image if you know of a freely licenced one or can take one yourself. Well done. ww2censor (talk) 10:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]