User talk:AlasdairEdits/Archive 2

L. Lin Wood

Hello, I've added four solid references to the mis-titled Lynn Wood, as you requested. The article still needs lots of work, but I hope you will agree that I've demonstrated notability. Let me know what you think. Cullen328 (talk)

thanks

thanks for setting my post right and the advice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetiesthatbind (talk • contribs) 23:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reasons

thanks for sorting that edit out

I saw an image of a chinese woman being "executed" by the death of a thousand cuts and was appalled and felt powerless - although the photo was nearly 100 years old

surely, I felt, there must be something to be gained somewhere

But I do find the wikipedia structure slightly complex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetiesthatbind (talk • contribs) 22:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Some years ago I looked at this type of page after coming up against POV pushers at the Bombing of Dresden who called the Allied bombings a genocide. I took it on myself to try to get this sort of page in line with what the majority of sources (as opposed to fringe views say). One technique is to move the controversial stuff out into another page (Eg Genocide in history) and to write other pages to help define certain other terms eg Genocidal massacre, and to write articles like definitions of genocide and Genocide under municipal laws, to help frame the debate on the talk page and in the process inform readers [I knew I had written a useful article (at least for academics) when two academics added their definitions to the genocide definitions list:-)]. It is interesting that boring pages like definitions of genocide hardly ever attract POV warriors, while Genocide in history where the blame game can be played attract swarms of them.

The Genocide article has also lead to some other stuff, related to genocide. For example I think that these two articles are a POV fork: Armenian Genocide denial and Armenian Genocide recognition, I have been unable to gain a consensus for merging them, but at least by writing articles such as the Whitaker Report, reduced the POV presented from advocate sites on the web which were previously cited as reliable sources, but which in fact cherry picked their primary sources.

Other articles like genocide include Terror bombing now thank goodness a redirect. but that lead to the need for a legal definition of what is and is not legal under the laws of war and that leads to articles like Aerial bombardment and international law and short articles like Military necessity, Non-combatant (funny how even reliable sources write "civilians" when they mean "non-combatants").

Other similar articles that needed lots of work were Historical revisionism, Historical revisionism (negationism), genocide denial (BLP considersation) and Denialism (still needs the POV list removed), terrorism (a basket case -- but at least I got in a section on polemics that seems to have stood the test of time) and Definitions of terrorism (a much better article).

Mercenaries (that was almost just a list of what is now in Mercenaries in popular culture), there are lots of others of a similar type, which I have been involved (eg child soldiers) because nearly all of them did not have a definition section based on international law, but what they are defined as in popular culture. On other area that I have found to be a real problem is articles about almost any subject where people tack on a POV list at the end. Eg Last stand as it was and it took two RfD for to get list of massacres changed to a format which has less POV problems.

I much rather prefer editing more strait forward military history (Eg Battle in Berlin or minor campaigns of 1815) and I have been trying to disengage from all of the above as much as I can, but if you come across such articles and need a hand let me know. -- PBS (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikiproject International Criminal Law

Hi Ajbpearce! Pi and I were looking for some guidance from Wikiprojects to start a task force, but no one ever responded to our task force proposal (see here) so we started our own project. It's entirely possible that it can be incorporated into another project as a task force at some point in the future, though. – Zntrip 19:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's good advice. There's plenty of work to be done everywhere. Hopefully we can coordinate something once the project picks up a bit. – Zntrip 22:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello AlasdairEdits. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 02:26, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I AIN'T DEAD

Ajbp (talk) 18:42, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP Human Rights in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Human Rights for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 17:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday cheer

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt ^talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be a newbie, a good friend, someone you have had disagreements with in the past, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

Cyrus cylinder

I have tried in 2010 to add Cyrus Cylinder as the first ever known political decree to document the attempt to respect human rights, but my writing got removed from the article about human rights. To those who are willing to pay attention to factual historical evidence about Cyrus Cylinder, I add this link http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2013/03/neil-macgregor-cyrus-cylinder. Hope that it would be convincing enough if other historical books are not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majlesi5 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons username

I am requesting a rename on Commons. My current Commons name is Ajbp. AlasdairEdits (talk) 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Tesla Roadster for you!

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AlasdairEdits. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AlasdairEdits. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thorp

Hi. I noticed your Tone tag at Edward O. Thorp. I do see a bit of puffery. Before I work on the article, I want to make sure I'm not missing anything. Can you tell me your concerns? O3000 (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It just sounded all very wrong tone. Guy probably has done some impressive things but the tone is wrong. A lot of the sources are primary sources and the language is very puffy. Compare the claim he "collaborated with Claude Shannon in creating the first wearable computer.@ With the more complex situation and language described in the article it links toAlasdairEdits (talk) 21:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, AlasdairEdits. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Paradoctor (talk) 23:20, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The email address on this account was out of date and no-longer valid. If you still wish to talk with me either leave me a message here or email again to the updated address, thanks AlasdairEdits (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can find the relevant information here: http://effective-altruism.com/ea/12z/concerns_with_intentional_insights/ and a related form in another community here: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/secularvoices/2017/08/02/even-after-apology-pro-truth-pledge-still-shrouded-in-deceit/ or even here where he is still actively hiring "marketing assitants" https://www.upwork.com/job/Marketing-Assistant-Long-Term-Full-Time_~0105671ca8dd18381e/ possibly I could have included it in the AFD discussion, but I was more agreeing with other people in the discussion which in any event closed fairly uncontroversially. AlasdairEdits (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlasdairEdits. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlasdairEdits. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Nick_Hatter

Hey Alasdair,

Hope this finds you well.

I saw someone had removed a notability warning and then you added it back.

I have appeared on national television in the UK on a very popular TV show (Trending Live on 4Music) as a special guest.

I also appeared on Cambridge TV talking about entrepreneurship and video game advertising.

Please see the talk page for Edit Requests (COI) for sources: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Nick_Hatter#Edit_request

Would also be grateful for these Edit Requests to be added.

Also recently did an exclusive interview with a popular online magazine in the UK which will be published soon (citation TBA).

I have quite a lot of press coverage out there about me, as well as giftgaming. I am wondering if you would be so kind to review these Edit Requests and if you agree, to remove the notability warning.

Thanks so much for your contributions to Wikipedia, and I look forward to hearing from you :-)

Kind regards, Nick

--TheNickHatter (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Having had the opportunity to look at the article in more detail I agree that a notability warning was not the best course. I have nominated the article for deletion.AlasdairEdits (talk) 17:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear you have come to this decision, especially given the vast amount of coverage there is out there about myself and giftgaming. I will request Oversight particularly as there has been much vandalism on this page, and I think it requires careful consideration. Thanks again for contributing to Wikipedia!

--TheNickHatter (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for supported my recent, albeit unsuccessful RfA. Your support was greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! AlasdairEdits (talk) 14:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of litigation involving the Electronic Frontier Foundation

The article List of litigation involving the Electronic Frontier Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a list of mostly non-notable court cases. Fails WP:IINFO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]