User talk:Admiral K
Hello, Admiral K, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Enjoy your stay with Wikipedia!
-- Ian 21:00, January 20, 2006 (UTC)
Prosthetic Hebrew
[edit]Sorry. They're still not notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Their entry has been deleted three times. Don't try re-creating it unless things change for them. DS 15:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on 21 Demands, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Have you had a look at WP:MUSIC? What part of it makes the band notable? If you tell me that I'll remove the tag, Jade Goody has actually gained fame and got multiple non trivial works published about her (e.g. major newspaper headlines and magazine columns) thats why shes allowed a page RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:21 Demands.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:21 Demands.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Create the article here then User:Admiral_K/21_demands, it will not get deleted in the space as it is in your user space, this is where you should prove the band meet WP:MUSIC. Do you want me to see if I can get a previously deleted version to save you from starting from scratch? YOU MUST PROVE NOTABILITY BEFORE MOVING IT INTO MAIN SPACE RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 19:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
You recently put a message on my editor review talk page asking what the point was in me setting up a review page for myself. I should let you know that this is a wikipedia project. Whereby editors can request a review by other editors of all their contributions. It gives constructive critisism so that users can improve the editing. My editor review page is just a subpage of the main page which can be found at wikipedia:Editor review, you will notice that many other editors have requested a review RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)