User talk:AdamSawyer

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, AdamSawyer, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Bludgeon Brothers

The article The Bludgeon Brothers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. The majority of this article is taken from The Wyatt Family. Notability not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 12:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Bludgeon Brothers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Bludgeon Brothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bludgeon Brothers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nikki♥311 03:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA	– The article has attained featured article status by passing an official review.
A	– The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
GA	– The article has attained good article status by passing an official review.
B	– The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
C	– The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
Start	– An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources.
Stub	– A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category.