User talk:Abyssal/Archive 10

Olenellus vermontanus (Your page on Paleontology in Vermont)

Hi, I noticed you use an image of Olenellus fowleri (that I uploaded), which occurs in Nevada and California on your page, probably to illustrate Olenellus vermontanus. This latter species has been reassigned by Lieberman (1999) to Mesonacis. That page has a photograph (right), (by Sam Gon III), that, although it is already quite extensively used, seems much better applicable on your page. An other file available that you may find usefull is a drawing of Bathynotus holopygus (left) from the publication in 1860 by James Hall, where the genus was first described on the basis of a specimen from Vermont. Hope this is of use. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 07:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infighting in Los Zetas

Hello, Abyssal.

Thanks for your interest in the article. I already did some trimming and went over most of the sources. Feel free make the changes you believe are necessary. Thanks again. ComputerJA (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of eurypterids

Nomination of List of eurypterids for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of eurypterids is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of eurypterids until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OBSIDIAN†SOUL 16:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for templating, heh. AfD told me to! :P Anyway, if you're still around, comments would be appreciated in the discussion. -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 16:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Paleontology in Montana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ash, Buffalo, Creation, Shells, Navajo, Ferns, Thunder birds, Elkhorn, Water lilies, Tongue River, Bridger Range, Glacier National Park, Grasshoppers, Cedar, Jack Horner, Melville, Pondweed, Native Americans, Roses, Bones, Lakota, Pawnee, Crow Reservation, Worms, Smoke tree and Sawtooth

Paleontology in Colorado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Epoch, Scales, Palms, Sequoia, Ferns, Grand Junction, Williston, Peter Robinson, Douglas County, Florissant, Middle Park, Oglala, Early, Limon, Native Americans, Lakota, South Table Mountain and Worms

Paleontology in North Carolina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Epoch, Marine, Scales, Wayne County, Ferns, Confederate, Chatham County, Halifax County, Martin County, Jones County, Hyde County, Cumberland County, Brunswick County, Beaufort County, Belemnites, Camden County and Seals

History of paleontology in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to French, Princeton, Allegany County, National Geographic, Laelaps, Amphibious, Thunderbird, Williston, Petrified forest, Grasshoppers, William Foulke, Jack Horner, San Ysidro, Caspar Wistar, Native American, Native Americans and Crooked River

Paleontology in North Dakota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Marine, Scales, Palms, Sequoia, Plains, Ferns, Thunderbirds, Aquatic, Little Missouri, Carnegie Museum, Woodlands, Native Americans, Reptilian, Bones and Serpents

Paleontology in Kansas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Montgomery County, Franklin County, Washington County, Spine, Ferns, Wallace County, Sumner County, Douglas County, Dickinson County, Anderson County, Glen Elder, Native Americans and Pawnee

Paleontology in Michigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Clinton County, Ferns, Calhoun County, Watervliet, Engadine, Gaylord, Jackson County, Kent County, Huron County, Emmet County, Berrien County, Lincoln Township, Trout Lake and Paris Township

Paleontology in New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Woodbridge, Amphibious, Union, New Jersey, Terrestrial, Middlesex County, Cape May County, Demarest, William Foulke, Hackettstown, Pubis, Caspar Wistar, Native American, Native Americans and Magic

Paleontology in Virginia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Montgomery County, Frederick County, Alleghany County, Washington County, Buchanan County, Scott County, Oak Hill, York County, Wise County, Westmoreland County, Bland County, Gate City, Belemnites and Arthur Campbell

Paleontology in Wisconsin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hemlock, Monroe County, Vernon County, Richland County, Lafayette County, Juneau County, Iowa County, Grant County, Dunn County, Dodge County, Brown County, James Hall, Seals and Worms

Paleontology in Kentucky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Columbus, French, Scales, Spring, Fulton County, Stems, Fayette County, William Clark, Wickliffe, Caspar Wistar, Native American and Bones

Paleontology in New Mexico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Indian, Marine, Shells, Palms, Artifacts, Las Cruces, San Ysidro, Black Lake, Native Americans, Bones, Coyote Creek and Worms

Paleontology in South Dakota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Creation, Navajo, National Geographic, Terrestrial, White River, Gregory County, Native Americans, Hackberry, Magic, Live birth and Mammoth Site

Paleontology in Arizona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ferns, Cast, Petrified forest, Petrified Forest, Graham County, Yuma County, Uplift, Native Americans, Painted Desert, Zuni and San Pedro Valley

Paleontology in Alaska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sequoia, Laurel, Artifacts, Colville River, Belemnites, Oaks, Nelson Island, St. Paul Island, Native Americans and Snug Harbor

Paleontology in Missouri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jefferson County, Linden, Ferns, Rushes, Reeds, Osage, Pike County, Rocky Ridge, Pomme de Terre River and Worms

Paleontology in Oregon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hemlock, Palms, Terrestrial, John Day, Native American, Native Americans, Crooked River, Modoc, Fig and Bethel, Oregon

Paleontology in Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ferns, Decatur County, Benton County, Hardin County, Rutherford County, Smith County, Henderson County, Chester County, Coon Creek and Worms

Paleontology in California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Marine, Cranes, Butte County, Swamp cypress, Terrestrial, Alligator lizards, Native Americans, Coffee berry and Creator

Paleontology in Minnesota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Marine, Ferns, Logs, Thunderbirds, Thunder birds, Fillmore County, Native Americans and Worms

Paleontology in Nebraska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Springs, Thunder birds, Cass County, Belemnites, Bluffs, Native Americans, Kansan, Delta and Zuni

Paleontology in Nevada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cracks, Sequoia, Logs, Sierra Nevada, Limbs, Giants, Stems, Woodlands and Native Americans

Paleontology in New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Palmyra, New York, Ferns, Giants, Creek, Petrified forest, Adirondack, Seals, New York Mills and Claverack

Paleontology in Ohio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Ferns, Mad River, Mounds, Deltas, Delta, Native, St. Anthony School and Charles Horn

Paleontology in Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Montgomery County, Adams County, Pottsville, New Cumberland, York County, Perry County, Caspar Wistar, Carnegie Museum and European contact

Paleontology in Idaho (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Epoch, Arco, Coeur d'Alene, Weiser, Equus, Native Americans, Worms and Nez Perce

Paleontology in Wyoming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Princeton, Pike, Amphibious, Green River, Native Americans, John Foster and Fred Brown

Paleontology in Arkansas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Clark County, Washington County, Terrestrial, Survey, Jackson County, Sevier County and James Kirkland

Paleontology in Delaware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Marine, Palms, Terrestrial, Oaks, Rays, Pines and Seals

Paleontology in Florida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Polk County, Rays, Uplift, Equus, Seals, Native American and Seas

Paleontology in Maryland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Epoch, Frederick County, Allegany County, Black bear, Fisher, Puma and Reptilian

Paleontology in Illinois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Peoria, Ferns, Roaches, Casts, Grundy County and Braidwood

Paleontology in Indiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Terrestrial, Survey, Devil's Lake, Native Americans, Deltas and Delta

Paleontology in Mississippi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Marine, Clay County, Ferns, Giants, Scott County and Iuka

Paleontology in South Carolina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Congo, English, Laurel, Giants, Belemnites and Worms

Paleontology in Texas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Marine, Native Americans, Diablo Mountains, Van Horn, Moonshiners and Playa

Paleontology in Utah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Epoch, Fremont, Green River, Native Americans, Surveyors and Deseret

Paleontology in Alabama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Marine, Mines, Washington County, Ferns and Fallen angels

Paleontology in Connecticut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ferns, Rushes, Hitchcock, Fairhaven and Well

Paleontology in Iowa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Benton County, Plymouth County, Bluffs and Native American

Paleontology in Oklahoma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ardmore, Lawrence, Comanche County and Native Americans

Prehistory of the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ferns, Hemisphere, Circulated and Worms

Paleontology in Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Floyd County, Deltas and Shorter College

Paleontology in Louisiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Red River and Native Americans

Paleontology in Maine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Marine, Terrestrial and Uplift

Paleontology in Rhode Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Polar, Pawtucket and College Hill

Paleontology in Vermont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Franklin County, Chittenden County and Beluga

Paleontology in Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sequoia, Terrestrial and Casts

Paleontology in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hemisphere, Petrified Forest and Native Americans

Paleontology in Massachusetts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Native American and Tuscarora

Paleontology in New Hampshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Matrix and Littleton

Paleontology in West Virginia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Marine and Weston

Paleontology in Washington, D.C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sewer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while

It's awesome to see you back! Abyssal (talk) 01:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Abyssal! Nice to see you, too! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 02:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, what's with all of the amazing "Paleontology in state X" articles, all of which you created on November 30th? Did you really write them all in one day? Seems unlikely, given the huge number of references added during the articles' creation. Nice work... are you going for a record? ;) Firsfron of Ronchester 05:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really impressive work, Abyssal! Good luck with the record breaking attempt. I recently broke a Wikipedia record (with a non-paleontology article); it's fun and keeps things interesting. Firsfron of Ronchester 14:36, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mine? Most citations on any Wikipedia page/most references in a list. Check out WP:RECORDS and List of former NTA Film Network affiliates in the United States (which isn't quite done yet, but which I hope to eventually get up to FL status). Firsfron of Ronchester 15:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to mention: if you do get the record, be sure to add the item to WP:RECORDS. :) Firsfron of Ronchester 20:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking me, Abyssal. I'd love to work on the review. You've done some great work in the past. I'm pretty busy tomorrow and Wednesday, but I may/will have scads of time after that. Firsfron of Ronchester 05:52, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know

Hi there. I don't believe we've met. I'm Francophonie&Androphilie. I'm relatively new here, but I'm notable for being one of the ten or so users who actually patrols the Article Feedback Tool logs regularly. So congratulations on being one of the only people to ever properly use the "flag as abuse" button! I was going through the list and found two spot-on flags of yours, both of which I hid. Anyways, I noticed that you're one of the many users who got a reviewer flag during the first pending changes trial, so it occurred to me that you might not be aware that that bit also enables you to hide feedback. Clearly you're the more experienced user here, so the only reason I'm telling you any of this is that practically no one knows much about AFTv5, especially when it comes to the monitor bit (which is bundled with rollbacker and reviewer). Or, if you did know all this (in which case I probably sound like a pompous ass), but were just looking for another monitor's input, you might want to take a look at WP:FRG, especially WP:FRG#Hiding and unhiding feedback - the two that I saw you flag were both blatant H3 (disruption) candidates, and since practically no one cares what happens with AFT, if you think it's a borderline case, you can probably just hide anyways. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 18:44, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there's still no way to do that. What I generally do is reply on their talk page with a link to the feedback submission (which you can find in the URL bar), and then, if their question wasn't related to article improvement, mark it as resolved. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 19:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hand-coding

Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyeswikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office ^connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paleontology in Colorado

Thanks for your note; I have checked your additions and have now verified the article. I may review some of the others in the coming days/weeks, as I expect to be submitting some more DYKs of my own. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 20:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Less busy now?

Hey Abyssal,

I just saw your note about working 17 hours on Christmas Day. Hope all's well, and that you've been able to get some rest since then. I'll note that I've also verified your DYK hook using The Dinosauria 2nd edition, which verifies the hook itself. Firsfron of Ronchester 05:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paleobotany stub

I think that it's worth adding your useful {{paleobotany-stub}} template to stub paleobotany articles, even where other stub templates are present (such as {{Silurian-stub}}, which you've been adding). It may encourage people like me who have written fuller paleobotany articles to go through Category:Paleobotany stubs and expand a few, whereas I wouldn't look at e.g. Category:Silurian stubs because I don't normally work on fossil animals.

By the way, there are quite a few stubs which User:Smith609 started which begin "GENUS_NAME was a genus of Silu-Devonian land plant with branching axes." When I have expanded some of these, it turned out that "Silu-Devonian" means "Silurian or Devonian or both" rather than "both", so they may not actually be Silurian. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the AFT5 Request for Comment

Hey Abyssal - this is to notify you that there is a discussion starting on the Article Feedback RfC talkpage that has ramifications for the RfC itself. Your input is much appreciated :). Thanks! and apologies if I've missed anyone Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Paleontology in the United States

Hello! Your submission of Paleontology in the United States at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see review of Paleontology in California in the same DYK template. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:16, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see review of Paleontology in North Dakota in the same DYK template. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only 2 cites are holding up the whole nomination! Thanks for taking care of these at your earliest convenience. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. We REALLY need to finish this nomination. If you can't add the cites, we'll either remove the paragraphs or take those articles out of the nomination. Yoninah (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paleontology in Kansas

Hi, I was wondering if you could find the proper page link for "saber-teeth" under the disambiguation page, Sabretooth. Best, Yoninah (talk) 20:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in the United States

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in the United States, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paleontology in the United States. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Prehistory of the United States

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Prehistory of the United States, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for History of paleontology in the United States

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article History of paleontology in the United States, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Alabama

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in Alabama, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Alaska

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in Alaska, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Arizona

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in Arizona, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Arkansas

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in Arkansas, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in California

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in California, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Colorado

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in Colorado, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Connecticut

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in Connecticut, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Delaware

On 7 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paleontology in Delaware, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that within the United States, dinosaur fossils (example pictured) have been found in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wyoming, but not in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, or Wisconsin? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]